RE: Ferrari California T Handling Speciale pack
Discussion
RoverP6B said:
I'm not trying to argue that at all, although I'd much rather have an E39 M5 as a weekend GT than this. What I am actually saying is that all of the factors which should make one want an expensive sports car/GT - pretty, good noise etc - are missing from the Cali.
So one can't find the California pretty ? Nor like its noise ? I think those things are quite subjective. It would seem that someone with a choice between one and a E39 M5 has actually chosen the Fezza. Are they wrong ?RoverP6B said:
I'm not trying to argue that at all, although I'd much rather have an E39 M5 as a weekend GT than this. What I am actually saying is that all of the factors which should make one want an expensive sports car/GT - pretty, good noise etc - are missing from the Cali.
It's totally subjective, you utter clown. Why are you citing your own very subjective opinion as if it's a measurable, provable fact? Just stop.RoverP6B said:
Well, maybe it is subjective, but over 50 years we've come to know what a Ferrari is and does. The California isn't. It's much closer to a Maserati, and not a particularly desirable one at that.
Do you include yourself in the "we" ? Do you also include Ferrari owners ? Are they bound to be a better judge than someone who has never even driven one yet sounds like an absolute authority on the topic ? It's all subjective and if someone's subjective opinion is utterly irrelevant and baseless, any reasonable person would say it's yours I'm afraid. Maybe you should get a test drive and report back ?Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff