RE: Jaguar F-Type SVR leaked

RE: Jaguar F-Type SVR leaked

Author
Discussion

F1GTRUeno

6,356 posts

219 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
Needs over 600bhp and to be hitting 200mph IMO.

Completely irrelevant statistics but it's all about penis waving with these cars.

matt-ITR

892 posts

190 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
Pretty sure this was the car I saw (disguised) in South Wales last week. Must be close to production.

Vee12V

1,335 posts

161 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
I should get excited about this car, but strangely I'am not really.

What's wrong (with me)?

smilo996

2,795 posts

171 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
Excellent. Project 7 was just the start then.

Fewer Porschars on the road will hopefully be the consequences of this car. No Turbos either.

Sounds like it will be a handful.

Dafuq

371 posts

171 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
Is it just the couple of glasses of red I have had this evening or does that front shot at the beginning of the article look distinctly Nissan ZX or GTR ish.

Not many of them around over here but saw one in the flesh in a dealership, looked proper. If the Aussie drivers weren't so appalling at staying in their own lanes, or signalling prior to manoeuvring or being able to stop at red lights, I might consider blowing the moths out of my wallet.

As it is, the moths can rest easy.

Oh, and on the 'pops and bangs' issue, cars and motor bikes over here are actually made be to as loud as possible so it should go down a storm. Send them all here please.

richyd

285 posts

228 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
Well I think it looks stunning! - as long as they really have stripped weight out of it. Forged alloys and carbon brakes are options on the current car, so I hope the weight loss goes beyond a Ti exhaust. Surely a carbon bonnet and roof are options, along with carbon front and rear bumpers. This is what I'd expect in a £110k+ Jag


bilobubbly

3 posts

100 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
such a nice and lovely car. But i think the prestige they have for F-Type SVR is well maintain.

Fire99

9,844 posts

230 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
So long as the car delivers what the press 'blurb' promises, I'll be a happy boy.

We do seem to expect an awful lot from Jaguar.. The odd pat on the back wouldn't go a miss. They're doing a pretty decent job in the most part.

unpc

2,837 posts

214 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
F1GTRUeno said:
Needs over 600bhp and to be hitting 200mph IMO.

Completely irrelevant statistics but it's all about penis waving with these cars.
Yeah cause 575bhp is just never enough. rolleyes

so called

9,090 posts

210 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all

Maldini35

2,913 posts

189 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
uremaw said:
Who ever it is at Jaguar SVO who keeps suggesting tacking naff 80s Halfords spoilers on to what are otherwise beautiful cars needs to have a serious word with themselves.
Agreed - it ruins such a pretty car.
Audi did it with the new R8 v10 plus.
So annoying.

9e 28

9,410 posts

202 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
What started out as quite a pretty car is getting uglier, vulgar and more Halfords by the day. vomit

Edited to say someone beat me to it ^^^^^^^^^

rtz62

3,370 posts

156 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
I won't be able to afford one for a few years, but I'd like to throw in my sixpenneth-worth;
I applaud the fact that JLR are going to throw off the shackles and give the car the power it deserves, and the power which customers will no doubt love.
Cheaper than a 911 of compatible performance, more expensive than the dreaded GTR, although both of those offer nominal +2 seating.
I'm a little confused about the weight loss, as on the face of it , it seems to rely on the exhaust and wheels, which are just bolt-one to the chassis.. Plus optional ceramic brakes. But that doesn't address the body, which could perhaps do with enrol on a 'Slimming World' course...
Hmmm. I'm sure I'm not the only one that would hope that the design team would have considered carbon-backed lightweight seats, and carbon fibre bonnet or doors, reducing weight from the front, middle and back of the car.
No doubt I'll be shot down in flames over these views, and be branded a heretic...

jl34

524 posts

238 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
rtz62 said:
I won't be able to afford one for a few years, but I'd like to throw in my sixpenneth-
I'm a little confused about the weight loss, as on the face of it , it seems to rely on the exhaust and wheels, which are just bolt-one to the chassis.. Plus optional ceramic brakes. But that doesn't address the body, which could perhaps do with enrol on a 'Slimming World' course...
Hmmm. I'm sure I'm not the only one that would hope that the design team would have considered carbon-backed lightweight seats, and carbon fibre bonnet or doors, reducing weight from the front, middle and back of the car.
No doubt I'll be shot down in flames over these views, and be branded a heretic...
the cost of tooling up for those components would be horrific when you consider how few of these will be made. As well as all the necessary crash testing, interior trim changes, bonnet panels, it would be hugely uneconomic

rtz62

3,370 posts

156 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
I won't be able to afford one for a few years, but I'd like to throw in my sixpenneth-worth;
I applaud the fact that JLR are going to throw off the shackles and give the car the power it deserves, and the power which customers will no doubt love.
Cheaper than a 911 of compatible performance, more expensive than the dreaded GTR, although both of those offer nominal +2 seating.
I'm a little confused about the weight loss, as on the face of it , it seems to rely on the exhaust and wheels, which are just bolt-one to the chassis.. Plus optional ceramic brakes. But that doesn't address the body, which could perhaps do with enrol on a 'Slimming World' course...
Hmmm. I'm sure I'm not the only one that would hope that the design team would have considered carbon-backed lightweight seats, and carbon fibre bonnet or doors, reducing weight from the front, middle and back of the car.
No doubt I'll be shot down in flames over these views, and be branded a heretic...

unpc

2,837 posts

214 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
The chassis is basically a cut down XK and carries the same panel thicknesses (and therefore weight) as the larger car. If this had been a ground up car, there's no way it would have seen the light of day with the volumes involved.

9e 28

9,410 posts

202 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
unpc said:
The chassis is basically a cut down XK and carries the same panel thicknesses (and therefore weight) as the larger car. If this had been a ground up car, there's no way it would have seen the light of day with the volumes involved.
XK also started off as a beautiful car like the f - type coupe. By the end it was the most awful looking Frankenstein I've ever seen. I can imagine Ian Callum wincing at the go faster spoiler tat but as long as the cheques keeping coming in from the Indians he'll keep his head down lol. Poor man. Er no sorry he's probably v.wealthy but you know what I mean! I expect he feels like the fellow who designed the original 928. Amazing design ruined by spoilers later in its life but this is taking that philosophy to a new level of fugly.

bertie

8,550 posts

285 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
uremaw said:
Who ever it is at Jaguar SVO who keeps suggesting tacking naff 80s Halfords spoilers on to what are otherwise beautiful cars needs to have a serious word with themselves.
Absolutely, that spoiler is horrendously naff!

Vroom101

828 posts

134 months

Wednesday 27th January 2016
quotequote all
MrTappets said:
Great news! Although a part of me would still love a hardcore version based on the V6S manual coupe to be the SVR.
I've said this on here before.

A stripped out, rear-wheel-drive, manual V6 S would be much more fun than this. Dump the sound proofing, fit lightweight bucket seats and wheels, upgrade the engine internals to make it rev more freely and maybe turn the boost up a little. Call it a 'Clubsport' or something like that. Now that would be a real driver's F-Type.

I've not doubt the SVR will be a riot, but its not as if the regular V8 S is slow now, is it? All Jag need to do is look what Porsche did with the GT4. Enthusiasts can't get enough of those, can they?

BaronVonVaderham

2,317 posts

148 months

Thursday 28th January 2016
quotequote all
Awesome. Pops, bangs and flames too please biggrin