RE: Is there hope for the 718 Boxster? PH Blog

RE: Is there hope for the 718 Boxster? PH Blog

Author
Discussion

SlimJim16v

5,661 posts

143 months

Monday 1st February 2016
quotequote all
ORD said:
If someone can identify for me anything that comes close to making up for losing the following, I'll change my view that a 4 cyl turbo has no place in a Cayman / Boxster:-

(1) Gorgeous flat 6 engine note.
(2) Proper throttle response.
(3) Crescendo torque and power delivery.

There's nothing that comes close to making up for even one of those things, let alone all 3. MPGs? Who cares?! Torque? The 981 has loads of torque.

That's why I don't need to drive the car to know it's a massive step down the list of 'cars that I want to drive'. Below any modern Lotus, for a start.
I think you've summed it up for all enthusiasts, especially Porsche lovers.
Badge lovers/posers however, that's a different matter.

shoestring7

6,138 posts

246 months

Monday 1st February 2016
quotequote all
SlimJim16v said:
ORD said:
If someone can identify for me anything that comes close to making up for losing the following, I'll change my view that a 4 cyl turbo has no place in a Cayman / Boxster:-

(1) Gorgeous flat 6 engine note.
(2) Proper throttle response.
(3) Crescendo torque and power delivery.

There's nothing that comes close to making up for even one of those things, let alone all 3. MPGs? Who cares?! Torque? The 981 has loads of torque.

That's why I don't need to drive the car to know it's a massive step down the list of 'cars that I want to drive'. Below any modern Lotus, for a start.
I think you've summed it up for all enthusiasts, especially Porsche lovers.
Badge lovers/posers however, that's a different matter.
No he hasn't.

HTH

SS7

ORD

18,120 posts

127 months

Monday 1st February 2016
quotequote all
Some people don't care about engines. That includes some car enthusiasts. But then why buy a Porsche over a Lotus? For my money, Porsche's trump card has been the engine for many years. No longer true for the Boxster/Cayman.

av185

18,514 posts

127 months

Monday 1st February 2016
quotequote all
ORD said:
Some people don't care about engines. For my money, Porsche's trump card has been the engine for many years. No longer true for the Boxster/Cayman.
Same as the M3 M4.

Trouble is, this line of thought is wasted on many, including an increasing number of PHers who are MEANT to be enthusiasts but clearly aren't.

Perhaps they should try Mumsnet instead...hehe

Guvernator

13,156 posts

165 months

Monday 1st February 2016
quotequote all
ORD said:
Some people don't care about engines. That includes some car enthusiasts. But then why buy a Porsche over a Lotus? For my money, Porsche's trump card has been the engine for many years. No longer true for the Boxster/Cayman.
Again I agree, IMO Lotus have always been better at handling but have been hugely outclassed by Porsche in the engine and cabin refinement areas. Now they've lost the big exciting engine, the new Exige has a V6 in it and has a cabin which is actually pretty usable day to day. At this point I have no idea what the Boxster\Cayman's USP is over the Lotus besides the badge and possibly slightly better build quality.

aka_kerrly

12,418 posts

210 months

Monday 1st February 2016
quotequote all
av185 said:
Same as the M3 M4.

Trouble is, this line of thought is wasted on many, including an increasing number of PHers who are MEANT to be enthusiasts but clearly aren't.

Perhaps they should try Mumsnet instead...hehe
Pathetic, if a 6 cylinder means that much to you save more an buy a 911.

I hope Porsche sell bucket loads of Boxsters.

Also, what are the odds that the next Evora won't be a 6 cylinder!?

av185

18,514 posts

127 months

Monday 1st February 2016
quotequote all
aka_kerrly said:
Pathetic
Good description of the new M3 M4 turbo engine after driving the V8.

av185

18,514 posts

127 months

Monday 1st February 2016
quotequote all
aka_kerrly said:
if a 6 cylinder means that much to you save more an buy a 911
Thanks for that great advice.......but I already own a few. biggrin:

driving

Edited by av185 on Monday 1st February 21:05

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Monday 1st February 2016
quotequote all
av185 said:
ORD said:
Some people don't care about engines. For my money, Porsche's trump card has been the engine for many years. No longer true for the Boxster/Cayman.
Same as the M3 M4.

Trouble is, this line of thought is wasted on many, including an increasing number of PHers who are MEANT to be enthusiasts but clearly aren't.

Perhaps they should try Mumsnet instead...hehe
A great engine on its own does not make a great car. I am as much a car enthusiast as anyone but I wouldn't pick a fun car if it didn't have stunning steering and handling. For me, engine character is secondary.

otolith

56,135 posts

204 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
SidewaysSi said:
A great engine on its own does not make a great car. I am as much a car enthusiast as anyone but I wouldn't pick a fun car if it didn't have stunning steering and handling. For me, engine character is secondary.
I can (and do) tolerate a peasant engine in a fun car if there are tangible benefits I care about. Lightness, for example.

DonkeyApple

55,299 posts

169 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
otolith said:
I can (and do) tolerate a peasant engine in a fun car if there are tangible benefits I care about. Lightness, for example.
The Coventry climax and lotus twin cam are two iconic examples.

av185

18,514 posts

127 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
SidewaysSi said:
A great engine on its own does not make a great car. I am as much a car enthusiast as anyone but I wouldn't pick a fun car if it didn't have stunning steering and handling. For me, engine character is secondary.
Depends what you mean by stunning steering and handling. Guess it is all relative.

The last of the hydraulic steering cars e.g 997 911 and E9x M3 were perfect examples of steering setup lost on the epas of the immediate replacement models. Whilst later models of the 911 show improvements to the epas, they are unlikely ever to provide the quality of feedback of the hydraulic systems.

In terms of engines however, I would much prefer an up to the minute tech fest characterful perfect linear high revving na as in the 991 GT3 even if the epas steering has compromises over the old cars hydraulic setup.

Thankfully it appears Porsche GT cars will remain na for some time yet.

driving

aka_kerrly

12,418 posts

210 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
av185 said:
aka_kerrly said:
if a 6 cylinder means that much to you save more an buy a 911
Thanks for that great advice.......but I already own a few. biggrin:

driving

Edited by av185 on Monday 1st February 21:05
beer

Good man. Which begs the question, would a Boxster be on your radar if you were seeking to update your garage a bit?

I suspect much like the original Boxster a significant number of buyers will have never owned a Porsche before so to them if it has 4 cylinders or 6 is likely to be less relevant to them so long as the 0-60 time is worth bragging about.

nickfrog

21,162 posts

217 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
Possibly if one worries about the reasons why other people buy a car.

av185

18,514 posts

127 months

Tuesday 2nd February 2016
quotequote all
aka_kerrly said:
beer

Good man. Which begs the question, would a Boxster be on your radar if you were seeking to update your garage a bit?

.
I have a na six cylinder Spyder and would never consider buying a four cylinder 'turbine' Boxster no more than I would consider buying a 'new wave' turbine non GT 911. thumbup

driving