No more white lines on main roads! Really?

No more white lines on main roads! Really?

Author
Discussion

V8 Fettler

7,019 posts

132 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
boyse7en said:
This isn't aimed at Motorways, major A roads or even out of town unlit B roads. The idea is to make people pay more attention in urban driving environments.

The element of uncertainty (eg. at a junction, if no one has priority then you have to check and interact with other drivers to establish who gives way) helps to ensure that drivers and other road users think about their driving and drive to the conditions rather than just assuming that they will be alright and steaming through.
The Toryograph article refers to a pilot scheme in North Norfolk, Blakeney perhaps?

Idiotic idea, hesitant motorists = dangerous motorists.

mattlad

261 posts

165 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
B3ALP said:
It's those Chevrons on the motorway that they need to get rid offurious

I nearly killed my self at 165 mph behind a 911 trying to follow the instructions.

I've always wanted to know what we are supposed to do if we find two chevrons together? Call the cops? confused

lostkiwi

4,584 posts

124 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
A daft idea no doubt spawned by an accountant looking to save a few quid and seized on by moronic town councillors with nary a brain cell between them.

fwaggie

1,644 posts

200 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
If they do try this on A roads, imagine trying to overtake dawdling morons who will now be driving slap band in the middle of the whole road.

thecremeegg

1,964 posts

203 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
Has anyone that's moaning actually ever been on a road where this has been done? It actually works really well! People aren't complete morons (despite what the gods on here think!) - they know to keep to the left!
I would wager that in fog if you're going fast enough to need the white line to see where you're going then you probably need to slow down a bit.

Cliftonite

8,408 posts

138 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
SuperPav said:
< Big snip >

My worry would be if it slows lots of people down, but actually creates a higher rate of accidents or near misses due to some people's inability to place their car appropriately on the road without some sort of offside marking.
This is what mini-roundabouts are for, surely?

wobble


SirSquidalot

4,042 posts

165 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
Next week we plan to remove street lights, cats eyes and any other things that make driving in poor conditions easier. How many yoofs will be killed overtaking on a blind road because "The road didnt say i couldnt".

HTP99

22,550 posts

140 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
thecremeegg said:
Has anyone that's moaning actually ever been on a road where this has been done? It actually works really well! People aren't complete morons (despite what the gods on here think!) - they know to keep to the left!
I would wager that in fog if you're going fast enough to need the white line to see where you're going then you probably need to slow down a bit.
When roads have been re-surfaced near me and there is a week or so without lines I have noticed that generally people drive slower and pay more attention, myself included; I think that doing away with the lines gets rid of a type of security blanket and makes you pay more attention.

I am all for it on local roads.

I find people driver better and traffic flows better when traffic lights are out of action too.

Sheepshanks

32,763 posts

119 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
trickywoo said:
Won't be long before the first court case.
Against who?

Sheepshanks

32,763 posts

119 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
veccy208 said:
What about head on insurance claims? Whos at fault if there is no 'side of the road.
There isn't a "side of the road" - it's just a road. Same as "my right of way" - a road is a right of way.

FunkyNige

8,883 posts

275 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
V8 Fettler said:
The Toryograph article refers to a pilot scheme in North Norfolk, Blakeney perhaps?

Idiotic idea, hesitant motorists = dangerous motorists.
Been trying to find out where in North Norfolk that is, but Google just throws up all the copy and paste articles from the original one.
North Norfolk district council (which I guess is what they're talking about rather than the geographical area) covers a few towns so maybe somewhere like Fakenham or Holt will be the lucky town.

Ali_T

3,379 posts

257 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
Have the morons that proposed this ever driven on a country road at night? Absolutely f**king idiotic idea. Who do we vote out to prevent this happening? Or who do we put under the guillotine first when the revolution comes?

Sheepshanks

32,763 posts

119 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
The approaches to Chester station doesn't have road markings. Lots of complaints about it, but apparently it's worked well in reducing accidents.

speedking31

3,556 posts

136 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
boyse7en said:
This isn't aimed at Motorways, major A roads or even out of town unlit B roads.
The Telegraph said:
Recent resurfacing in London saw the central markings on three A roads erased.
So that quote is not part of the story confused

speedking31

3,556 posts

136 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
Personally I hope it is a rip roaring success and is extended to double yellow and double white lines.

Freddy88FM

474 posts

134 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
There isn't a "side of the road" - it's just a road. Same as "my right of way" - a road is a right of way.
Can you clarify what you mean here? Presumably in an accident where two cars are both obeying the speed limit and there are no other factors, a car that enters the 'lane of the other' would surely be to blame in a head-on collision.

Regarding right of way. Same thing. If a car pulls out across another when it is signposted to give way, I'd have thought 'right of way' would be exactly what determines blame.

I think the road being a 'right of way' and the assignment of 'right of way' mean two different things.

Riley Blue

20,955 posts

226 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
Ali_T said:
Have the morons that proposed this ever driven on a country road at night? Absolutely f**king idiotic idea. Who do we vote out to prevent this happening? Or who do we put under the guillotine first when the revolution comes?
'Country road at night'? This is a proposal for urban streets.

drdino

1,150 posts

142 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
What's the speed limit on those stretches they want to test this?

mikey k

13,011 posts

216 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
Some Gump said:
Head of the roads has clearly never left the m6 toll at Rush our. It's carnage, as 50 2l tdi's all race to be "first". We want that for the whole motorway?
hehe so true

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2016
quotequote all
No lines? It won't happen.

It'll be proposed, run through a safety audit, the designers will be told it'll not work, it will create more risks than it solves, and will be recommended that white lines go down. I can't see many local councillors willing to put their neck on the line over something so substantial.