RE: Winkelmann's Lamborghini - end of an era? PH Blog
Discussion
RoverP6B said:
The Aventador's engine is just two Audi V6s, really...
I call bullst.There are no V6's currently in production or even at the time the Aventador's engine was designed that have a 60 deg angle - around 2008 (the time the Aventadors engine was designed) the VW Group was either using 90 deg V6s or 10.6/15 deg VR6s.
Just in case anyone wants to try and work out what this joker is on about, here's a helpful chart...
So RoverP6B, oh great one, engine expert, arbiter of taste and font of all knowledge, which one of those VW Group (NOT Audi) V6 engines is the L539 V12 based on?
Don't worry, take your time - we'll all wait.
RoverP6B said:
not a proper Lamborghini engine, unlike the Murcielago's.
Like people who actually buy an Aventador would ever care. Oh and define 'proper' - I'd like to understand better what that means in the context you use it exactly.A10 said:
Really? Anything to back that up?
Just reports I heard on the web from disappointed Lamborghini owners who drove the Aventador and Huracan, felt disappointed, bought rival products instead and told Winkelmann what they thought. Apparently he was totally dismissive of their criticisms - apparently he was wont to call them "fking morons". He also banned journalists who said the same from any future Lamborghini launches. Not really doing the brand's credibility much good.nickfrog said:
Another car you have thoroughly tested I take it, Mr Rover ? I guess you don't really need to.
The point of the matter is that it is based on Audi's modular engine architecture - it's most closely related to the engine in the S4 (although that's supercharged). It is not a wholly bespoke Lamborghini engine, unlike the fabulous old Giotto Bizzarrini V12.RoverP6B said:
The point of the matter is that it is based on Audi's modular engine architecture - it's most closely related to the engine in the S4 (although that's supercharged). It is not a wholly bespoke Lamborghini engine, unlike the fabulous old Giotto Bizzarrini V12.
But it has a different bore, stroke and angle to the S4 engine. How is it so 'closely related'? RoverP6B said:
The point of the matter is that it is based on Audi's modular engine architecture - it's most closely related to the engine in the S4 (although that's supercharged).
"I (sidesauce) personally designed the Aventador." Do you see how stupid that sounds?Your word means nothing, you didn't actually design the engine. Show us the facts to back up what you're saying.
We'll all wait. Again.
RoverP6B said:
A10 said:
Really? Anything to back that up?
Just reports I heard on the web from disappointed Lamborghini owners who drove the Aventador and Huracan, felt disappointed, bought rival products instead and told Winkelmann what they thought. Apparently he was totally dismissive of their criticisms - apparently he was wont to call them "fking morons". He also banned journalists who said the same from any future Lamborghini launches. Not really doing the brand's credibility much good.Evilex said:
Oh well, there's always Pagani, I suppose.
They seem like the true spiritual successors to the barmy Lamborghinis of old.
The new ones are simply too anodyne. Silly colour schemes do not a flamboyant car make.
I think that's right. I still like Lambos, but they don't quite have that loony element now they are being built and overseen in a Tuetonic manner. Pagani does seem to have picked up where the Lamborghini I grew up with left off. They seem like the true spiritual successors to the barmy Lamborghinis of old.
The new ones are simply too anodyne. Silly colour schemes do not a flamboyant car make.
My summary is this. He has produced cars that sell well and probably saved the company in the short term. The new v12 engines lack the noise and character of the old ones that is painfully clear. The cars are safer to drive but more understeery than ever before but that is what sells at the minute. The madness and that true magic lamboness is gone but might come back in the new turbo era that is only a couple of years away. Driving a Lambo for the first time should be extremely intimidating and nervy,crazy doors ,can't see out, crazy maniac of an engine , proper skills neaded on the gearchange and now it just isnt. ..
sidesauce said:
Hitch78 said:
I do not believe they have become any less wild, they've just become less flawed. I think a lot of people get stuck on that. I hope Winkelmann stays.
This.Diablo SV said:
sidesauce said:
Hitch78 said:
I do not believe they have become any less wild, they've just become less flawed. I think a lot of people get stuck on that. I hope Winkelmann stays.
This.You talk with rose tinted spectacles where people like Jay Kay sell his Diablo as the new aspiration in reality is a LaFerrari/P1/Pagani etc. You say that no-one can afford a Sesto Elemento or Veneno when in reality more people in the world today can afford to buy these two cars than could afford any Lamborghini in the 70s/80s!
Lamborghini's of old are just that - old. Unreliable. Uncomfortable. Awkward to live with. People who actually buy them nowadays care that they are reliable, that the electrics work, that they are relatively comfortable to live with and they certainly don't really compare them to the Countach or Diablo and why should they? If someone wants a scary, unreliable and uncomfortable Lamborghini they can simply buy an old one. If the fact that one can use and live with a Gallardo or Huracan as a daily driver means the loss of what you call spirit then personally I think it's the best thing to happen to them. Lamborghini would otherwise have been consigned to the history books decades ago.
Also, anyone driving any car at 180mph without their heart pumping is probably dead.
sidesauce said:
Diablo SV said:
sidesauce said:
Hitch78 said:
I do not believe they have become any less wild, they've just become less flawed. I think a lot of people get stuck on that. I hope Winkelmann stays.
This.You talk with rose tinted spectacles where people like Jay Kay sell his Diablo as the new aspiration in reality is a LaFerrari/P1/Pagani etc. You say that no-one can afford a Sesto Elemento or Veneno when in reality more people in the world today can afford to buy these two cars than could afford any Lamborghini in the 70s/80s!
Lamborghini's of old are just that - old. Unreliable. Uncomfortable. Awkward to live with. People who actually buy them nowadays care that they are reliable, that the electrics work, that they are relatively comfortable to live with and they certainly don't really compare them to the Countach or Diablo and why should they? If someone wants a scary, unreliable and uncomfortable Lamborghini they can simply buy an old one. If the fact that one can use and live with a Gallardo or Huracan as a daily driver means the loss of what you call spirit then personally I think it's the best thing to happen to them. Lamborghini would otherwise have been consigned to the history books decades ago.
Also, anyone driving any car at 180mph without their heart pumping is probably dead.
Diablo SV said:
sidesauce said:
Diablo SV said:
sidesauce said:
Hitch78 said:
I do not believe they have become any less wild, they've just become less flawed. I think a lot of people get stuck on that. I hope Winkelmann stays.
This.You talk with rose tinted spectacles where people like Jay Kay sell his Diablo as the new aspiration in reality is a LaFerrari/P1/Pagani etc. You say that no-one can afford a Sesto Elemento or Veneno when in reality more people in the world today can afford to buy these two cars than could afford any Lamborghini in the 70s/80s!
Lamborghini's of old are just that - old. Unreliable. Uncomfortable. Awkward to live with. People who actually buy them nowadays care that they are reliable, that the electrics work, that they are relatively comfortable to live with and they certainly don't really compare them to the Countach or Diablo and why should they? If someone wants a scary, unreliable and uncomfortable Lamborghini they can simply buy an old one. If the fact that one can use and live with a Gallardo or Huracan as a daily driver means the loss of what you call spirit then personally I think it's the best thing to happen to them. Lamborghini would otherwise have been consigned to the history books decades ago.
Also, anyone driving any car at 180mph without their heart pumping is probably dead.
No-one under the age of 30 really cares about owning new cars, much less old cars - it's a different era. You talk about the price of classic cars but it's funny how the very latest ones like the Laferrari, 918, P1, Paganis and Koenigseggs et al don't seem to lose value either so what's your point?
I couldn't care less about the Apple car but I do know that the winners are those who look forward and don't dwell in the past. Classic cars are analogue and todays world is definitely digital. I accept it, if you don't then that's up to you. It's 2016 now - time to step out of the 70s.
Edited by sidesauce on Sunday 7th February 14:30
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff