The only way is (north) up! PH Blog
Battle lines need to be drawn between the direction of travel wanderers and true north fundamentalists!
Think carefully before answering.
I like to think of myself as a generally tolerant chap. And in all other respects my relationship with PHTV co-host James is a good one. But I find one element of his personality a perpetual disappointment.
He's a direction of travel man.
I find this odd. Because he's generally a sound, no-nonsense kind of bloke. And I bet if I gave him a proper map he'd do what real men do, hold it upright and use spatial awareness and a sense of direction to understand north is up and everything else relative to that. Not stand on a street corner turning the map round and round, scratching his head looking like some sort of confused tourist.
And yet every time we swap cars there it is - nav set to direction of travel or, worse, 3D direction of travel. He claims this is because he's 'a modern gentleman' in touch with technology. I say he's directionally confused. Or, as a Surrey boy, just scared of the north and a bit jittery beyond his current home in the midlands.
Practical evidence of the evils of direction of travel navigation was revealed to me the other week travelling from Silverstone to near Telford. In my head I knew roughly I needed to head north-west across country to the M40, north, west a bit on the M42, pick up northbound M5/M6 and then west along the M54. I could picture it in my mind clear as day but had the nav on to get me to my final destination. My downfall was trusting the machine to sort the route out and get me there. But the JLR nav in the Range Rover locks to direction of travel when a route is programmed. And by the time it had me in a circle of despair somewhere around Bridgnorth it was too late to do anything about it.
I'll accept I might, possibly, be displaying some stereotypical northern belligerence here. So let's have it out - north up for the win or move with the times and the direction of travel?
Dan
I find the same true of paper maps as well (and I don't care what anybody thinks) - but I can afford to concentrate a bit harder when I'm reading a paper map, so if north is always up then it's not the end of the world. When I'm using a satnav, on the other hand, which is effectively trying to read a map and drive at the same time, I'd much rather have the map-reading part made as undemanding as possible...
The two religions are "north up" and "track up". "Track up" is intuitively easy for people who want to follow the directions of the machine. "North up" is for old school purists like me, and is better for situational awareness. It means when you report your position you can glance at the display or chart and easily say "Ten miles south-west of Little Piddling-in-the-Rain" without having to do a lot of mental gymnastics about directions.
For car use the subject I'm most usually interested in is "are we nearly there yet" and "who far to the next turn-off", and "track up" , or a 3d type representation of the roadway is easiest for then. But if you want a bigger sense of the area, e.g. because you want to pick your own diversion around something, then I find "north up" on a 2d map better.
North up is preferred in flying instruction with paper charts because the chart is littered with written verbal and numerical information you have to be able to read and assimilate at a glance, and unless you can read a small frequency number with equal facility from any orientation, you're better off keeping it all the right way up to read.
North up is preferred in flying instruction with paper charts because the chart is littered with written verbal and numerical information you have to be able to read and assimilate at a glance, and unless you can read a small frequency number with equal facility from any orientation, you're better off keeping it all the right way up to read.
The advantage of 3D representation is that you see detail of what's nearby, but still see an overview of what's in the distance. And 3D doesn't make sense with 'north up'.
'North up' in a car just seems bizarre. I'd never consider using it.
If I had to use sat nav it'd be a 2D fixed North option, I can see having the map in 3D only makes it harder to process info at a glance because you're trying to process spacial awareness of the little (or not so little) 3D image and where you are on the map.
On satnavs, my £200 tomtom appears to be better than my c.£1000 pro nav in my 3 series. Doh! Still, the latter looks nicer.
The only time direction of travel gets confusing is when heading downhill, that surely has to mean heading down on the map requiring an orientation change!
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff