RE: Mercedes-Benz SL500: Review

RE: Mercedes-Benz SL500: Review

Author
Discussion

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

219 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Any car that needs a cosmetic job so soon should pretty obviously not have been released looking like it did in the first place.

kambites

67,593 posts

222 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Oddball RS said:
Any car that needs a cosmetic job so soon should pretty obviously not have been released looking like it did in the first place.
The R231 was released four years ago. That's about normal for a mid-life facelift isn't it?

Ed Straker

221 posts

144 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
I guess I would say this, but I prefer the pre-facelift (which I own)
And I prefer my 500 to the SL55 I had before that.
It's quite simply an epic bit of kit.

only1ian

689 posts

195 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Hill Hunter said:
What SL driver weighs 75kg!
This one

powerstroke

10,283 posts

161 months

Monday 29th February 2016
quotequote all
Will it fit a set of golf clubs and will the bridge club and rotarians like it ??? could be a winner !!!!

TOOMANYMS

43 posts

163 months

Tuesday 1st March 2016
quotequote all
Hill Hunter said:
What SL driver weighs 75kg!
Most women?

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2016
quotequote all
Completely forgetting this model, it will be interesting to see what the next SL will look like. The ingredients are simple - a front engined, RWD, folding hard-top convertible with a big engine. It also has to 'fit' the bloodline. You wouldn't thought it was easy to muck that up, but as cars become more jammed-packed (even by M-B standards) full of electronics and devices, I can't help thinking the days of the Pagoda and R107 are over.

R230 was nice though.