RE: New Audi TT RS revealed

RE: New Audi TT RS revealed

Author
Discussion

Varn

205 posts

202 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
AWD, FI, Auto? Lol - no thanks! It has the 3 major kill-joys to driving enjoyment.

It does look fantastic though.

IndyH

36 posts

104 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
Performance is absolutely bonkers. 3.7 secs is ridiculous!This takes things to the next level, especially for the 50 odd K starting price.

I definitely understand the allure of a stupidly fast, point to point, all weather car, especially with the weather here in the UK.
Heavy rain...no problem.


Having said that, if it
1) wasn't a 2 seater
2) my wife wouldnt give me stick for buying a "girls" car

.....I might have seriously considered it.

The steering is likely to be dead of feeling and lack of driver engagement is exactly why i would rather something rear wheel drive.



kambites

67,588 posts

222 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
Is it a 2-seater? I assumed it was a 2+2 like the rest of the TT range, at least in coupe form.

swimd

350 posts

122 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
This TT-RS topic has 82 replies, the 718 Cayman topic has 60 replies. The Cayman one was posted before the Audi one. Quo vadis Porsche? scratchchin

ORD

18,120 posts

128 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
I cannot get my head around the obsession with AWD for 'all weather' usage. Am I the world's best driver? I drive RWD cars in heavy rain and have never once felt any need to have drive to the front wheels. It always sounds like journalistic nonsense to me.

kambites

67,588 posts

222 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
ORD said:
I cannot get my head around the obsession with AWD for 'all weather' usage. Am I the world's best driver? I drive RWD cars in heavy rain and have never once felt any need to have drive to the front wheels. It always sounds like journalistic nonsense to me.
I think if you actually want to drive fast in conditions where grip is highly erratic it helps a bit; but one could argue that driving fast in conditions where grip is erratic is a bit idiotic anyway.

I'll stick to RWD too. smile

ORD

18,120 posts

128 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
kambites said:
ORD said:
I cannot get my head around the obsession with AWD for 'all weather' usage. Am I the world's best driver? I drive RWD cars in heavy rain and have never once felt any need to have drive to the front wheels. It always sounds like journalistic nonsense to me.
I think if you actually want to drive fast in conditions where grip is highly erratic it helps a bit; but one could argue that driving fast in conditions where grip is erratic is a bit idiotic anyway.

I'll stick to RWD too. smile
Grip or traction? My cars all have All Wheel Grip as standard smile

As for traction, isnt that only a problem at lowish speeds and/or if your engine is in the wrong place for a powerful RWD car (i.e. the front). In seriousness, traction is more the issue, I would agree.

I agree about speeds in bad weather. Stopping distance and visibility should be holding you back a lot more than traction.

kambites

67,588 posts

222 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
ORD said:
Grip or traction? My cars all have All Wheel Grip as standard smile
Both if the car torque vectors (which I assume the TT does?) although obviously you don't get significantly better braking performance.

I tend to find that more grip (and especially more traction) makes cars less fun though. Some people prefer a situation where they never approach the limits of the car.

Edited by kambites on Monday 25th April 18:39

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
Separated at birth?





StottyEvo

6,860 posts

164 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
If it can turn corners, and that's one hell of a big IF

I may be interested

theStick

5 posts

113 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
I look at that yellow convertible and see an angry lego man.

kambites

67,588 posts

222 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
StottyEvo said:
If it can turn corners, and that's one hell of a big IF

I may be interested
I'm sure it will turn corners very quickly, the previous version certainly did. The question for me would be whether it provides any sort of interaction while doing so.

Vocht

1,631 posts

165 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
If the original Mk1 in top spec (3.2, quattro, dsg) was a £32k car back in 1999 (Around £50k in todays money) can be had for a shade over £4,000 today, does that mean in 15ish years these new RS's will be had for the same? I sure do hope so!

Shnozz

27,502 posts

272 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
StottyEvo said:
If it can turn corners, and that's one hell of a big IF

I may be interested
If it turns corners anywhere like the old one it will be immense. And if a simple remap can give it R8 performance with hatchback practicality it will be immense.

The TT-RS must be the most underrated piece of incredible engineering. Yes, it looks little different from the cooking TT (some may see that as a positive), and yes, it might not be massively involving. No different on those fronts to a 911 T. And equally like the 911T, usable daily with staggering performance. It really is a pretty incredible bit of kit for not a lot of outlay. Folk praise the GTR for giving exploitable performance in a usable package and yet the TT-RS somehow seems to be binned off as an understeering average TT. Little tweak with an ARB and a remap and go play.

Timfy

331 posts

120 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
ORD said:
I am not sure I really understand the market for this car.

(1) Utterly pointlessly fast. It wont attract anyone but people who like fast cars.
(2) People who like fast cars would normally like a car that is fun to drive. This is an AWD turbo car with a heavy engine hanging out over the front wheels, numb steering and a tendency to understeer at all speeds (I would expect).
(3) It has a very girly image, so wont attract the kind of poser that normally buys fast but dull cars (i.e. other fast Audis).
It's fast, for those who like to be seen in fast (and expensive looking) cars.

Most people buying one probably wouldn't think the engine belongs anywhere else. If it's fast enough for the TLGP and can catch up to within 3 inches of the back of the car in front they're having fun. Many people seem to think grip=good handling/AWD=grip, turbo=always faster/must be better, light, numb steering=great around town/parking, and understeer=safer than oversteer.

Yes the TT has always appeared a bit girly, but tarty, vaguely sporty looking cars do sell in huge numbers to men and women. It's got enough glitzy LED lights, "get out of my way" bits of styling and a massive German badge. It could utterly rubbish and they'd still sell as many as they can make. Making it stupidly fast is just the icing on the cake.

These cars never seem to have to handle like an Elise to sell big. It's surprising Audi bother to make them as good as they do (and they are very, very good at what they're built for) since they could be utter pups and they'd still sell. I know if I had £50k+ to spend on a brand new "sports" car a TT would be quite far down my list of possible choices, but I can definitely see how they sell so many of them. A lot of what makes a car "fun" is deeply subjective and many won't push past 2/10ths of what a car like this can really do.

They aren't really aimed at enthusiasts who like to get up at 4am on a Sunday to blast along empty, winding B-roads. Some will inevitably be bought by driving enthusiasts and I really don't think they'll be disappointed as it'll no doubt be a brilliant machine, but I don't think it's really marketed at them.



Edited by Timfy on Monday 25th April 19:47

dc2rr07

1,238 posts

232 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
IndyH said:
Performance is absolutely bonkers. 3.7 secs is ridiculous!This takes things to the next level, especially for the 50 odd K starting price.

I definitely understand the allure of a stupidly fast, point to point, all weather car, especially with the weather here in the UK.
Heavy rain...no problem.


Having said that, if it
1) wasn't a 2 seater
2) my wife wouldnt give me stick for buying a "girls" car

.....I might have seriously considered it.

The steering is likely to be dead of feeling and lack of driver engagement is exactly why i would rather something rear wheel drive.
In answer to your point 2 that is why you buy one for the wife laugh the two rear seats are handy for her handbag though.smile

dc2rr07

1,238 posts

232 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
AH33 said:
Those new wheels are bleurgh. Any pics with the 18s?

Overall, decent. Im not a big fan of the new TT anyway, but it wears the RS stuff well. Definitely better looking than the new R8 imo.
Thought the wheels where not to bad, not sure what size they are but it said only 19" or 20" rims available probably about a dozen different options to take a bit more out of your pocket if you do not like the standard fitment.

ZX10R NIN

27,640 posts

126 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
I think that looks good it's very distinctive.

mattwhite709

328 posts

100 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
Stupidly quick, not sold on that 3d front grill though

dc2rr07

1,238 posts

232 months

Monday 25th April 2016
quotequote all
ORD said:
I cannot get my head around the obsession with AWD for 'all weather' usage. Am I the world's best driver? I drive RWD cars in heavy rain and have never once felt any need to have drive to the front wheels. It always sounds like journalistic nonsense to me.
You must be as when it snows I cannot get out of our estate unless I go and grit the top of our road smile