Shall we have a PH Top 100 - Best 4wd performance cars
Discussion
MrBarry123 said:
Pedant.
I accept it won't be AWD all of the time however the requirements list "Must be AWD of some kind" not "Must have permanent AWD". The Haldex system can shift power so that all wheels are powering the car - the car therefore does have an AWD system of some kind.
My mistake. Missed the some kind part. Was going to post G60 based Golfs but didnt as were not AWD ! Now where are my pics ?I accept it won't be AWD all of the time however the requirements list "Must be AWD of some kind" not "Must have permanent AWD". The Haldex system can shift power so that all wheels are powering the car - the car therefore does have an AWD system of some kind.
G60 limited
Edited by MDMA . on Thursday 28th April 21:21
MDMA . said:
That would look great in my garage 
Thanks. Find you own! 
Caddyshack said:
I thought the r32 and r33 had identical gearboxes and attesta pump. My 205 4x4 pug has r33 gtr box and I am certain it is identical to r32 albeit with cooling as mine is an r.
The R33 and R32 gearboxes are interchangeable, it's the transfer boxes that have a pre-loading on both the R33 and R34s. If you pull the 4WD fuse in an R32 it will be completely RWD. If you do the same thing in an R33 or R34 you'll knacker the clutch pack in the transfer box unless you take out the front drive shafts.
Twini Mini
Twice the power, Twice the driven wheels.
History:
http://www.classicandsportscar.com/news/csc-featur...
Twice the power, Twice the driven wheels.
History:
http://www.classicandsportscar.com/news/csc-featur...
Edited by k-ink on Thursday 28th April 22:02
There seem to be plenty of images of Group B cars in this thread, I don't recall 205 T16 E2's being being "production cars/freely available to the public", nor indeed a Quattro S1/2 ....
But on the basis the OP hasn't thrown his toys out of his pram for these blatant transgressions, I propose this :
Some would contend they looked better in WRC blue with 555 plastered all over them and a Scots bloke behind the wheel, strangely I didn't ....
Available to the public ? Yes (if your pockets were deep enough)
Production car ? Prodrive had quite a production line going back in 1997/8/9, they churned out a good few (34) of them in the process (though the aforementioned Scottish bloke did his best to keep the number of intact cars, low)
Road usable ? H*ll yeh, I drove it on the road on slicks with a handbrake arrangement that was distinctly illegal.
But on the basis the OP hasn't thrown his toys out of his pram for these blatant transgressions, I propose this :
Some would contend they looked better in WRC blue with 555 plastered all over them and a Scots bloke behind the wheel, strangely I didn't ....
Available to the public ? Yes (if your pockets were deep enough)
Production car ? Prodrive had quite a production line going back in 1997/8/9, they churned out a good few (34) of them in the process (though the aforementioned Scottish bloke did his best to keep the number of intact cars, low)
Road usable ? H*ll yeh, I drove it on the road on slicks with a handbrake arrangement that was distinctly illegal.
ks, it is a monumental carcptsideways said:
These are most definately bottom of the pile. dreadful in every respect, not that fast awful in anything other than a straight line, overweight, overcomplicated.
0-60 in 5.2 seconds not that fast?? The later models were much lighter and handled better (especially the mr versions). Plus they still look epic!
leexj220 said:
cptsideways said:
These are most definately bottom of the pile. dreadful in every respect, not that fast awful in anything other than a straight line, overweight, overcomplicated.
0-60 in 5.2 seconds not that fast?? The later models were much lighter and handled better (especially the mr versions). Plus they still look epic!Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff