RE: Golf GTI Clubsport S 'ring record

RE: Golf GTI Clubsport S 'ring record

Author
Discussion

darrenw

346 posts

283 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
I had a good look around a couple of them here at Woerthersee today smile

IMG_8213 by Retro-Motoring and WoertherseePics.com, on Flickr

Derek Chevalier

3,942 posts

173 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
rb5er said:
Derek Chevalier said:
rb5er said:
and would get spanked by a proper 2 seater.
Spanked in what respect?
Around the track and likely in terms of fun.

Anything under or around 8mins on the Nurburgring is very fast indeed but this is not a production vehicle, its a modified track car.
I'm pretty sure the production car won't be too much slower. What proper 2 seater for £35k can you get that will lap as quickly, and be as much fun on track?

JockySteer

1,407 posts

116 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
fathomfive said:
pep87 said:
Megan was only 5 seconds short!!!!! but with 125 BHP less and it was two years ago.
Top lurking.
Top lurking mixed with a comment that makes no sense.. What Megane has 125bhp less than 310 and did a 7.54 ring time?

vz-r_dave

3,469 posts

218 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
So VW shorten the goal posts (track) and claim a record.... hmmm, why 40k? Why not price it according to it's competition?


DoubleD

22,154 posts

108 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
pep87 said:
Megan was only 5 seconds short!!!!! but with 125 BHP less and it was two years ago.
Who's Megan? Was she the driver of the Golf?

rb5er

11,657 posts

172 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
Derek Chevalier said:
I'm pretty sure the production car won't be too much slower. What proper 2 seater for £35k can you get that will lap as quickly, and be as much fun on track?
370z, Caterham, Lotus Elise S.

Then theres the proper usable 4 and 5 seaters and all the other usable hot hatches with various layouts etc etc.

Glasgowrob

3,245 posts

121 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
have to admit I love all the nurburg battles between the manufacturers, but if its the case and VW have used a car that wont be as sold (spec wise) then poor show.

cant wait to see what renaultsport comes out with next smile

BeirutTaxi

6,631 posts

214 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
Is it engaging though? Some of the most fun cars I've driven have been the Ford Puma and a 80bhp (current shape) Fiesta. Speed and power doesn't mean a drivers car.

Derek Chevalier

3,942 posts

173 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
rb5er said:
Derek Chevalier said:
I'm pretty sure the production car won't be too much slower. What proper 2 seater for £35k can you get that will lap as quickly, and be as much fun on track?
370z, Caterham, Lotus Elise S.

Then theres the proper usable 4 and 5 seaters and all the other usable hot hatches with various layouts etc etc.
Elise S: For some reason Elises tend to be slow round track for their given power/weight - these would be way off the pace of the top hatches if both were driven by a good driver, let along average
370z: Nowhere near the focus of R26.R etc. Don't they tend to overheat with hard track use? Off the pace of the fastest hatches
Caterham: Woudn't fancy driving one of these down to a European track weekend

As for all the other 4/5 seater - how many of them would put up with sustained track use?




rb5er

11,657 posts

172 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
Derek Chevalier said:
Elise S: For some reason Elises tend to be slow round track for their given power/weight - these would be way off the pace of the top hatches if both were driven by a good driver, let along average
370z: Nowhere near the focus of R26.R etc. Don't they tend to overheat with hard track use? Off the pace of the fastest hatches
Caterham: Woudn't fancy driving one of these down to a European track weekend

As for all the other 4/5 seater - how many of them would put up with sustained track use?
Your top point, yes much less power but it would be faster on a tighter circuit. We won't know either way as this Golf is not the production car.

370z: the closest related 'ring time is for a 350z with 286bhp. It came in at 8:26 in 2002 (14 years ago). A 370z has 344bhp. Certainly not off the pace of the fast hatchbacks. I have not heard of them overheating on track. Source? Do you know the production Golf won't have any issues? Nope because this is not a production car being recorded.

Caterham: Your point is pretty much irrelevant. Depends on conditions. Some oeople might prefer it. Subjective. Also how do you know the production Golf is not very stiff and uncomfortable as this is not the production car being tested.


Your last point...well guess what.....we don't know how this car will hold up on track because...........this is not the production car being tested/recorded.

Do you get the common theme occurring here?

GrumpyTwig

3,354 posts

157 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
rb5er said:
Panjy said:
They've built a reputation on being honest and open to their customers

That's funny biggrin
I'm pretty sure he was joking with that comment.

ash reynolds

469 posts

191 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
TazLondon said:
0-62 in 5.8 seconds? Why so slowwwwwww?
Gear ratios I'd wager.


anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
Just to be clear, 1 second in 7:49 is 0.21%.

So this Golf is 0.21% "faster" than a Civic. Statistically irrelevant tbh.

JoeMarano

1,042 posts

100 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
ash reynolds said:
Gear ratios I'd wager.
I'd go with fwd. I think high 5's is the fastest they are going to go in road trim realistically.

J4CKO

41,560 posts

200 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
Derek Chevalier said:
rb5er said:
Derek Chevalier said:
I'm pretty sure the production car won't be too much slower. What proper 2 seater for £35k can you get that will lap as quickly, and be as much fun on track?
370z, Caterham, Lotus Elise S.

Then theres the proper usable 4 and 5 seaters and all the other usable hot hatches with various layouts etc etc.
Elise S: For some reason Elises tend to be slow round track for their given power/weight - these would be way off the pace of the top hatches if both were driven by a good driver, let along average
370z: Nowhere near the focus of R26.R etc. Don't they tend to overheat with hard track use? Off the pace of the fastest hatches
Caterham: Woudn't fancy driving one of these down to a European track weekend

As for all the other 4/5 seater - how many of them would put up with sustained track use?
The Nissans should be really fast as they dont have back seats biggrin

I am sure with the same type of fettling any car could be set up to do a time round the Nurburgring far better than the standard model, the 370Z would be faster than the 350Z as it has another 50 bhp or more, remove some weight, stiffen it up, put some super sporty tyres on and there wouldnt be a lot in it either way.







anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
Derek Chevalier said:
Elise S: For some reason Elises tend to be slow round track for their given power/weight - these would be way off the pace of the top hatches if both were driven by a good driver, let along average
370z: Nowhere near the focus of R26.R etc. Don't they tend to overheat with hard track use? Off the pace of the fastest hatches
Caterham: Woudn't fancy driving one of these down to a European track weekend

As for all the other 4/5 seater - how many of them would put up with sustained track use?
Put a Megane on 'super' tyres and up the boost and the result will be similar. Put a Focus on 'super' tyres.....

You might not be able to drive to the ring yourself in a Caterham but it's not that difficult. But you're missing the point. And, i'm sure the Golf would start waving the white flag after a few sessions, the Caterham wouldn't, it's not carrying all that fat.

In summary. Another Golf that people are going to buy and talk about in the pub. For everyone else slightly tweaking one of the current crop would give you the same, cheaper.

Wills2

22,822 posts

175 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
MrBarry123 said:
Love it. Love it. Love it.

1 second off the M3 GTS!

Very impressive.
The new one? That's something like 7min 28sec so 21 seconds quicker.


funkyrobot

18,789 posts

228 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
Mind numbingly boring st, again.

Ooh, VW are at the ring again. Let's all stand at the side of track having a wk, trying to get our hot sauce on the car.

I do wonder why PH love VAG so much.

HorneyMX5

5,309 posts

150 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
rb5er said:
Derek Chevalier said:
Elise S: For some reason Elises tend to be slow round track for their given power/weight - these would be way off the pace of the top hatches if both were driven by a good driver, let along average
370z: Nowhere near the focus of R26.R etc. Don't they tend to overheat with hard track use? Off the pace of the fastest hatches
Caterham: Woudn't fancy driving one of these down to a European track weekend

As for all the other 4/5 seater - how many of them would put up with sustained track use?
Your top point, yes much less power but it would be faster on a tighter circuit. We won't know either way as this Golf is not the production car.

370z: the closest related 'ring time is for a 350z with 286bhp. It came in at 8:26 in 2002 (14 years ago). A 370z has 344bhp. Certainly not off the pace of the fast hatchbacks. I have not heard of them overheating on track. Source? Do you know the production Golf won't have any issues? Nope because this is not a production car being recorded.

Caterham: Your point is pretty much irrelevant. Depends on conditions. Some oeople might prefer it. Subjective. Also how do you know the production Golf is not very stiff and uncomfortable as this is not the production car being tested.


Your last point...well guess what.....we don't know how this car will hold up on track because...........this is not the production car being tested/recorded.

Do you get the common theme occurring here?
You keep banging on about it not being the production car but the only difference is the roll cage and harnesses. The roll cage will have been fitted for safety first, yes it probably adds a small amount of increased body stiffness but these modern shells are far from the floppy hatches of the 80s and 90s. It also adds a weight penalty although I suspect VW countered that with some extra weight removal from the test car. The harnesses add sweet FA technically but anyone who has driven a car with them knows it's easier to feel a cars movement underneath you when your properly strapped in, again fitted for safety of the test driver.

I reckon if you bought the car, knew the circuit like a pro and drove it balls out you get that lap time.

rtz62

3,369 posts

155 months

Wednesday 4th May 2016
quotequote all
I know they've been out of production for a good few years, but I wonder how a TVR Sagaris with the 4.0 engine, 380 bhp (unless you could get the 420bhp Super Sport engine) and weighing just over a metric tonne would fair, after all it is a 2 seater..
Mind you, after owning one if ant vouch for whether the brakes etc would last a scorching lap of the 'Ring.....