Is Mercedes B Class The Answer ?
Discussion
Zedboy1200 said:
My sister brought her '16' Jazz round Saturday. Much bigger than previous version and apparently sprightly...
OP's Mum has a 10K budget - although an early mk3 might just be coming into range. Old people are not getting on with new Jazz's tech stuff.Wouldn't have said it was bigger though, never mind "much" - seems pretty well the same. IIRC correctly the boot is slightly smaller as they moved the rear seats back a bit.
I spent a while looking up car sizes on Parkers (I have rounded off) and discovered that the camera clearly lies !
Her old A3 is only 4150 Long 1850 Wide and whilst she's happy to have a bigger car, the parking scuffs suggest it's not in everyone else's interests.
The B class is 2040 W which really isn't ideal - the B and C Max are even wider.
The Yeti is 1950 W
The Jazz is simply too slow.
The Note looks huge in pics yet is only 4100 L 1700 W so I've sent her to have a look - I suspect she'll hate the interior.
The Merc A class is wider at 1975 but only 3850 L so I suspect that will be the better compromise.
Thanks
Her old A3 is only 4150 Long 1850 Wide and whilst she's happy to have a bigger car, the parking scuffs suggest it's not in everyone else's interests.
The B class is 2040 W which really isn't ideal - the B and C Max are even wider.
The Yeti is 1950 W
The Jazz is simply too slow.
The Note looks huge in pics yet is only 4100 L 1700 W so I've sent her to have a look - I suspect she'll hate the interior.
The Merc A class is wider at 1975 but only 3850 L so I suspect that will be the better compromise.
Thanks
I think some of those dimensions are with mirrors and some are without - most cars within the same class are remarkably similar widths.
Is the Jazz that slow? OK, it's not a ball of fire, but it's perfectly adequate. The CVT is OK to drive (the iShift from 2009 to 11 is terrible) especially as the engine needs revs, which most owners are reluctant to use in a manual. I can't imagine its performance is much different to an old A3 auto.
Is the Jazz that slow? OK, it's not a ball of fire, but it's perfectly adequate. The CVT is OK to drive (the iShift from 2009 to 11 is terrible) especially as the engine needs revs, which most owners are reluctant to use in a manual. I can't imagine its performance is much different to an old A3 auto.
Sheepshanks said:
I think some of those dimensions are with mirrors and some are without - most cars within the same class are remarkably similar widths.
Is the Jazz that slow? OK, it's not a ball of fire, but it's perfectly adequate. The CVT is OK to drive (the iShift from 2009 to 11 is terrible) especially as the engine needs revs, which most owners are reluctant to use in a manual. I can't imagine its performance is much different to an old A3 auto.
I'll take another look to check - all the info was from Parkers so I'd hope it was consistent.Is the Jazz that slow? OK, it's not a ball of fire, but it's perfectly adequate. The CVT is OK to drive (the iShift from 2009 to 11 is terrible) especially as the engine needs revs, which most owners are reluctant to use in a manual. I can't imagine its performance is much different to an old A3 auto.
Yes - the 130 diesel has a lot of torque low down, I've no doubt a teenager could rev a yaris to death and make progress but it has over 30% less power too.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff