Electric cars - finally a counter arguement...

Electric cars - finally a counter arguement...

Author
Discussion

cuda

Original Poster:

464 posts

240 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
This was in The Week newspaper this week:



And this doesn't take into account the emmissions (not just CO2 but Nox and Sox) that are emitted shipping the nickel ore to the battery manufacturers and shipping the cars back around the world...

Electric cars - yet another con from our 'leaders'.

Cuda

carreauchompeur

17,846 posts

204 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
Sorry, but that's utter tripe. Really, think about it.

cuda

Original Poster:

464 posts

240 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
carreauchompeur said:
Sorry, but that's utter tripe. Really, think about it.
Back it up then...

pherlopolus

2,088 posts

158 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
the only reasons the toxins are on the road is due to the dirty diesels etc....

and of course the only reason for the surge in fuel cell research is that the Petroleum companies make hydrogen from the cracking of crude oil while they make diesel/petrol etc

That article is not unbiased, and is pure BS

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

170 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
It's not utter tripe, I pointed out years ago that vehicle emissions were becoming so low that the biggest contributor to PMs would soon be brake/tyre dust.

The London Underground is electric but the metal/brake dust is a health 'risk'.

What is tripe is that any of this, including the worst diesel emissions from modern cars, is in anyway a significant health risk.

carreauchompeur

17,846 posts

204 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
"Electric cars are a bit heavier than other cars so they kick up more brake dust". Seriously?

Roo

11,503 posts

207 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
Most hybrids use the electric motors to act as brakes which is why brake pads last 100,000 miles. Not much brake dust off of them.

Wouldn't say they're overly heavy either.

Milemuncher

514 posts

115 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
Sounds like a 'think tank' has been briefed to find ways to justify high taxation of electrics for a couple of years time when we're all driving them. The Exchequer can't afford the reduction in tax revenues.

George111

6,930 posts

251 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
cuda said:
carreauchompeur said:
Sorry, but that's utter tripe. Really, think about it.
Back it up then...
No, you prove the snippet is saying something true !

I'm not an advocate of EVs at the moment, for various reasons, but this sort of reporting (I refuse to call it journalism) is just gutter nonsense.

You only have to think about it to understand that it's nonsense. Just use your common sense.


Phunk

1,976 posts

171 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
Yes they are slightly heavier than the equivalent ICE car but nothing in comparison to a SUV!

The brake pad thing is utter rubbish, electric cars use the regen to slow down 90% of the time, most pads and discs last over 100k!

98elise

26,537 posts

161 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
cuda said:
carreauchompeur said:
Sorry, but that's utter tripe. Really, think about it.
Back it up then...
Ok how about this. Much more brake dust is produced by an ICE than an EV. EV's hardly use their brakes as the majorty use regen. Even if it were true that EV's kick more of it up from the surface, its a bit like claiming EV's cause a bigger wake when they pass through diesel truck exhaust emissions.

Also you mention shipping batteries. i assume you think petrol just appears in petrol stations. Pound for pound how much weight is shifted around the world for an ICE car vs a Petrol car? Then factor in that you still have the battery at the end which is recyclable.



Edited by 98elise on Wednesday 25th May 18:52

98elise

26,537 posts

161 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
Mr GrimNasty said:
It's not utter tripe, I pointed out years ago that vehicle emissions were becoming so low that the biggest contributor to PMs would soon be brake/tyre dust.

The London Underground is electric but the metal/brake dust is a health 'risk'.

What is tripe is that any of this, including the worst diesel emissions from modern cars, is in anyway a significant health risk.
You know that most braking in EV'is regen don't you.

LU Trains don't use regen they use traditional brakes.


Edited by 98elise on Wednesday 25th May 18:51


Edited by 98elise on Wednesday 25th May 19:39

chasingracecars

1,696 posts

97 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
Toyota Prius 2010 1325Kg
BMW 320d 1495Kg

Utter horse twiddle!!!!

However I do think if you consider the production of the cars there may be a small case.


To Add ..

However how many people can afford a Tesla S it got to be nearly a £30k on top of the 5 series,

Model S Tesla 1,961 kg
BMW 5 Series 520d 1690 Kg in Sport Trim

Edited by chasingracecars on Wednesday 25th May 18:52

krisdelta

4,566 posts

201 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
Phunk said:
Yes they are slightly heavier than the equivalent ICE car but nothing in comparison to a SUV!

The brake pad thing is utter rubbish, electric cars use the regen to slow down 90% of the time, most pads and discs last over 100k!
Exactly this. Spurious nonsense. 1.5 tons of EV is no heavier than 1.5 tons of anything else.

steviejasp

1,646 posts

165 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
What a load of st. The alloys on our Leaf never even get dirty.

rxe

6,700 posts

103 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
Tesla S - 2239Kg (Model S P90)

Range Rover Sport 2140 Kg

So, a decent electric car is about the same weight as a lardy SUV. But regen takes the edge off the brake pads. Tyre wear and dust will be similar.

Edit - and looking at the various weights of the cars, the 60 is 250Kg lighter than the 90. So 30kW of batteries is 250kg. A battery pack that will take you 300 miles will weigh 750kg, whatever happens. Electric cars with short range will be light, but until batteries are a lot lighter per kW, long range electrics will be heavy.

Edited by rxe on Wednesday 25th May 19:03


Edited by rxe on Wednesday 25th May 19:03

CoolHands

18,618 posts

195 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
What total bks.

Can't believe someone would actually put that together and 'publish' it. Might as well write about aliens living among us.

98elise

26,537 posts

161 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
chasingracecars said:
Toyota Prius 2010 1325Kg
BMW 320d 1495Kg

Utter horse twiddle!!!!

However I do think if you consider the production of the cars there may be a small case.


To Add ..

However how many people can afford a Tesla S it got to be nearly a £30k on top of the 5 series,

Model S Tesla 1,961 kg
BMW 5 Series 520d 1690 Kg in Sport Trim

Edited by chasingracecars on Wednesday 25th May 18:52
Compare the model S to an Audi A8 or a Mec S Class and its about even (all around the 2000kg mark). The AMG mercs are about 2300kg!

98elise

26,537 posts

161 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
rxe said:
Tesla S - 2239Kg (Model S P90)

Range Rover Sport 2140 Kg

So, a decent electric car is about the same weight as a lardy SUV. But regen takes the edge off the brake pads. Tyre wear and dust will be similar.

Edit - and looking at the various weights of the cars, the 60 is 250Kg lighter than the 90. So 30kW of batteries is 250kg. A battery pack that will take you 300 miles will weigh 750kg, whatever happens. Electric cars with short range will be light, but until batteries are a lot lighter per kW, long range electrics will be heavy.

Edited by rxe on Wednesday 25th May 19:03


Edited by rxe on Wednesday 25th May 19:03
The same weight as an SUV as you've chosen the 4 wheel drive dual motor version with the biggest battery! The ones with a single motor weigh about the same as a big ICE car, ie about 2000kg.

The model S is huge, so its going to be a heavy as any big car.

Mercky

642 posts

135 months

Wednesday 25th May 2016
quotequote all
98elise said:
You know that most braking in ICE's is regen don't you.

LU Trains don't use regen they use traditional brakes.


Edited by 98elise on Wednesday 25th May 18:51
An ICE isn't what I thought it was if it uses regen braking.