RE: Toyota Hilux across Namibia

RE: Toyota Hilux across Namibia

Author
Discussion

Freegs

96 posts

113 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
I don't understand your comment about the test being like a 'waterproof watch test in the Maldives'. As you acknowledge there are millions of Hiluxs out there!

Had a newish one last year as a hire car for a week out in Namibia. Really wasn't impressed, soooo sluggish that it made overtaking the big lorry land-train type things basically impossible (sounds a bit like your cattle truck story). Also twisted/flexed longitudinally terribly at 70+ making things extremely uncomfortable for the 3 rear passengers over those long 200km stretches.

Probably decent off road but we didn't do anything too extreme and pretty solid but wasn't wholly enamored.

Baked_bean

1,908 posts

192 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
To the people complaining how the Hilux has become less utilitarian, there will be an entry level model without carpets etc for more agricultural use. I assume Toyota didn't want the model in the press shots though.

You can still make order a new Active (entry level) single cab Hilux which is very basic other than air conditioner n & CD player.

skyrover

12,673 posts

204 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
Toyota really lost it with the design on this one... just awful

I'm sure a ZU-23-2 will fit nicely in the bed though

gizlaroc

17,251 posts

224 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
I get the point.

Trucks used to be trucks, not cars. Simple, rugged, utilitarian. Even when new the interiors were simple enough not to worry and easy to clean.
Then buy the utilitarian version, back in 1997 they also did a luxury one too.


300bhp/ton said:
Modern trucks are way too car like inside. Lots of electronics, gadgets and so forth. Sure this appeals to lots, but there are those of us who'd like a simple basic truck still.
As above.

However, 20 years ago we still had new cars on the road from the 80s, I think the one he was talking about was from 1988-1996?
Cars in general were a lot simpler then too.

Things move on, they offer a Hilux for everyone, always have, and probably always will.




300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

190 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
gizlaroc said:
300bhp/ton said:
I get the point.

Trucks used to be trucks, not cars. Simple, rugged, utilitarian. Even when new the interiors were simple enough not to worry and easy to clean.
Then buy the utilitarian version, back in 1997 they also did a luxury one too.


300bhp/ton said:
Modern trucks are way too car like inside. Lots of electronics, gadgets and so forth. Sure this appeals to lots, but there are those of us who'd like a simple basic truck still.
As above.

However, 20 years ago we still had new cars on the road from the 80s, I think the one he was talking about was from 1988-1996?
Cars in general were a lot simpler then too.

Things move on, they offer a Hilux for everyone, always have, and probably always will.
I assume you are deliberately missing the point?

gizlaroc

17,251 posts

224 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
I assume you are deliberately missing the point?
The point being you prefer cars from 20 years ago?

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

190 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
gizlaroc said:
The point being you prefer cars from 20 years ago?
Maybe. But that isn't the point here. You questioned another poster. I agree with them and gave a reason. You don't have to agree with or even like it. But that is the reason. Which should enable you to understand the rational, which was you initial comment, that you didn't get it.

EnglishTony

Original Poster:

2,552 posts

99 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
gizlaroc said:
The point being you prefer cars from 20 years ago?
Maybe. But that isn't the point here. You questioned another poster. I agree with them and gave a reason. You don't have to agree with or even like it. But that is the reason. Which should enable you to understand the rational, which was you initial comment, that you didn't get it.
Have got your head stuck in your bottom again?

dvs_dave

8,630 posts

225 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
Soon to be seen piloted by an orange roid raging gym bunny, or badly parked in the disabled bays at your local LA Fitness.

gizlaroc

17,251 posts

224 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Maybe. But that isn't the point here. You questioned another poster. I agree with them and gave a reason. You don't have to agree with or even like it. But that is the reason. Which should enable you to understand the rational, which was you initial comment, that you didn't get it.
He said it was thirstier and more expensive, it is not.

He said he didn't want one with a flash interior. Buy the basic one.

I was simply pointing out there was a choice.

powerstroke

10,283 posts

160 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
Chainsaw Rebuild said:
Maybe I'm missing the point but why are modern trucks so massive and with posh interiors?

I used to have a 1996 hilux and it was awesome. We did climbing trips in it, moved canoes, moved house. What it didn't need was making bigger and having an interior you couldn't get muddy.

Make them simple and reliable, less thirsty and utilitarian cool. Don't make them huge, fast, thirsty and expensive.
They do also come in a basic model its just toyota eurrope think everyone wants a tart mobile so that what they push
they also take the piss , these have been avalible in Austriala since last year and
with a 2.8 version of the new gd diesel and a v6 petrol ...

leginigel

428 posts

184 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
I love my MK3 but only for short drives ,I had a D4D which I swapped for a TD5 discovery because I wanted more comfort and as for 30 mpg I wish.As for the new HiLux I would like a test drive !

powerstroke

10,283 posts

160 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
rodericb said:
They aren't built in Durban anymore. Are the Euro built ones now built in Argentina or Thailand? They may be doing this stunt to address fears of the not-as-good thai built hilux.

My 2015 hilux is thai built , no problems and more japanese parts than the SA built ones so given the choice id go Thai!!! in fact if the new one isn't built in thailand I will be hanging on to mine for a while until I see what the other builds are like !!!

ben5575

6,281 posts

221 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
dvs_dave said:
Soon to be seen piloted by an orange roid raging gym bunny, or badly parked in the disabled bays at your local LA Fitness.
This sadly. They don't come much more 3.14 Quay than this, as much as I love the TG Polar episode.

powerstroke

10,283 posts

160 months

Thursday 26th May 2016
quotequote all
EnglishTony said:
Great vehicle but is it PH?
No!!! only a TVR is !!! or maybe a lotus ok then an MX5 No an audi isn't that's chav or mumsnet...Hilux well you need something to use when you can't use the TVR because its snowing or broken down thumbup

EnglishTony

Original Poster:

2,552 posts

99 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
Matt Bird said:
fivetenben said:
EnglishTony said:
Great vehicle but is it PH?
Na, a true PHer chooses a nackered old Porsche as their steed in which to cross the Namib Desert... wink





Namibia is such a stunning country, and the article is really making me crave a return visit... I'd recommend it to anyone who likes getting off the beaten track.
Bravo sir, you win. clap
If I was the editor of this site I'd be sending a fresh-faced eager young motoring journalist to interview this man with a view to running an article about knackered Porsches in Namibia.

Matt Bird

1,450 posts

205 months

PH Reportery Lad

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
Freegs said:
I don't understand your comment about the test being like a 'waterproof watch test in the Maldives'. As you acknowledge there are millions of Hiluxs out there!

Had a newish one last year as a hire car for a week out in Namibia. Really wasn't impressed, soooo sluggish that it made overtaking the big lorry land-train type things basically impossible (sounds a bit like your cattle truck story). Also twisted/flexed longitudinally terribly at 70+ making things extremely uncomfortable for the 3 rear passengers over those long 200km stretches.

Probably decent off road but we didn't do anything too extreme and pretty solid but wasn't wholly enamored.
OK, good point. Will make a tweak!

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

190 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
gizlaroc said:
He said he didn't want one with a flash interior. Buy the basic one.

I was simply pointing out there was a choice.
Can you show me where this basic spec one is? I can't see any mention on the Toyota website or in the down loadable brochure. In fact, they seem to labour the point repeatedly that it is equipped like an SUV....


fivetenben

589 posts

170 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
EnglishTony said:
Matt Bird said:
fivetenben said:
EnglishTony said:
Great vehicle but is it PH?
Na, a true PHer chooses a nackered old Porsche as their steed in which to cross the Namib Desert... wink





Namibia is such a stunning country, and the article is really making me crave a return visit... I'd recommend it to anyone who likes getting off the beaten track.
Bravo sir, you win. clap
If I was the editor of this site I'd be sending a fresh-faced eager young motoring journalist to interview this man with a view to running an article about knackered Porsches in Namibia.
Cheers guys... I'm not sure I win though; it certainly didn't feel the case when one of the front wheels fell off in the middle of nowhere with an electrical storm baring down on us. It's at moments like that, that a dependable Hilux makes ALL the sense...

While I'd more than happily provide content for an article, there's more info on the Porsche's trip across Africa here, if anyone's interested: www.bencoombs.net

Right, enough thread hijacking - back to Toyotas...

rodericb

6,748 posts

126 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Can you show me where this basic spec one is? I can't see any mention on the Toyota website or in the down loadable brochure. In fact, they seem to labour the point repeatedly that it is equipped like an SUV....

The website alludes to the range not being finalised yet. There are basic versions of the new Hilux - cab chassis, rear wheel drive, black bumper on the front, steel wheels.... it has aleady been on sale around the world for a few months already.