The worst car you've ever driven...

The worst car you've ever driven...

Author
Discussion

lowdrag

12,873 posts

213 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
As Trabi said earlier in the thread, you have to be old to have driven some really rough cars. The MOT was originally the 10 yr test so applied to cars over that age and was so basic it was quite funny really. If it drove and stopped it passed. Any of today's cars is a miracle compared to those days, but of cars of their time one of the worst had to be the Renault 19 I had as a hire car and if anyone has driven a Clio diesel non-turbo then on any hill it was down to third gear. My company Marina had wipers set up for LHD (cost-cutting for export), drum brakes and no servo. It was delivered with a gearbox jammed in second. Try driving a 1500 Maxi and see if you can find the gears and go on a Charles Atlas course to turn the steering. My SL Mercedes turned heads but was a ponderous barge with planks for seats. Over-engineered though. My very first car though was an E-type in 1961. Well, it was a Morris 8 series E actually. about 25 bhp, but immeasurably better than the equivalent Ford of it's day which had vacuum wipers driven off the inlet manifold. Accelerator to the floor, wipers stopped; going down hill foot off the pedal and wipers went like the clappers. 3-speed gearbox, cable brakes, drums of course, and a top speed of 45 mph. Frankly, you youngsters have no idea just how bad cars really were in those days. But coming up to date I had a hire Corsa when I flew in last year. It had that horrible dashboard light telling me to change gear, but changing gear still never got the ruddy thing over 80 mph on the motorway. It was truly terrible for a car of today. But I still miss the wind-out windscreen which was as close as we got to air-conditioning in those days.

RammyMP

6,752 posts

153 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Got a Fiat Punto hire car at the moment, it's woeful. The boot release is a tt, build quality is ste and the further you push the accelerator the louder it gets, doesn't go any quicker though!

Why do people buy these cars when you can get something like a Seat Ibiza for similar money?

kiethton

13,890 posts

180 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Dacia Sandero

I had one of the 0.9 turbo things in South Africa as a hire car (badged a Renault) for 8k km, awfully slow and crap on fuel as you had to absolutely rag it everywhere to even move!- 35mpg! - even when I crashed it the damage was awful for such a small impact!



Chris1255

203 posts

111 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Nomination for the Fiat cinquecento. I'd just bought a one year old (original) mini cooper then had to drive a friend's Fiat the same age. I'm fairly sure the brake pedal was ornamental and going round even wide sweeping bends was terrifying because it felt like it wanted to flip over.

Every single aspect of driving the mini was superior despite it being based on a design which was 32 years older. Quite an achievement on Fiat's part.

Byker28i

59,434 posts

217 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
veccy208 said:
I find these threads about awful cars a bit over exaggerated to say the least.
Someone mentions a p12 Primera! My dad has owned one of these for years, great firm cornering car. Most certainly doesn't wallow. the 1.8 engine is a great engine (not a power house but perky enough for the type of car.) He has driven it for 13yrs or so and put 160k on it and all its needed is a couple of link arms and an exhaust. Definitely the no1 most reliable car I have ever come across.
We had a 2litre petrol one, bought it at 3 years old from a main dealer, never did more than 24mpg yet had no performance. Big, comfy, well spec'd, but if it had been either more frugal or had some performance I could have forgiven it.

We had it 9 years, it had 155K miles on it when we traded it in, although it did have a new engine at 60K miles, as at the first service they forgot to put oil in it when they took it for a test drive.

zarjaz1991

3,479 posts

123 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Chris1255 said:
Nomination for the Fiat cinquecento. I'd just bought a one year old (original) mini cooper then had to drive a friend's Fiat the same age. I'm fairly sure the brake pedal was ornamental and going round even wide sweeping bends was terrifying because it felt like it wanted to flip over.

Every single aspect of driving the mini was superior despite it being based on a design which was 32 years older. Quite an achievement on Fiat's part.
I've driven a cinquecento, when I was 19. A pink one.

The pinkness I could handle, but in all other respects it was utterly awful.

Dr Interceptor

7,766 posts

196 months

Tuesday 31st May 2016
quotequote all
Trabi601 said:
JimbobVFR said:
Back at the end of the 90s I went to Romania a few times, the first time we went our BT liveried transit got as much attention as a Ferrari would here. Hardly surprising when just about every car was one of these turgid piles of ste.



A Corsa, Serena or even a Yugo just don't compare with how appalling they are to drive.
Good. Someone else who has driven a truly awful car!
The original Renault version of that is what my Mum drove when I was first old enough to remember a car - so probably about 18 months old.

veccy208

1,320 posts

101 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
Byker28i said:
veccy208 said:
I find these threads about awful cars a bit over exaggerated to say the least.
Someone mentions a p12 Primera! My dad has owned one of these for years, great firm cornering car. Most certainly doesn't wallow. the 1.8 engine is a great engine (not a power house but perky enough for the type of car.) He has driven it for 13yrs or so and put 160k on it and all its needed is a couple of link arms and an exhaust. Definitely the no1 most reliable car I have ever come across.
We had a 2litre petrol one, bought it at 3 years old from a main dealer, never did more than 24mpg yet had no performance. Big, comfy, well spec'd, but if it had been either more frugal or had some performance I could have forgiven it.

We had it 9 years, it had 155K miles on it when we traded it in, although it did have a new engine at 60K miles, as at the first service they forgot to put oil in it when they took it for a test drive.
Yea the 1.8 was the one to go for, dad is still getting around 40mpg out of it. I remember the 2.0 didn't get as good a write up and the diesels were Renault so inclined to be a bit problematic with turbos and such like.

DJP

1,198 posts

179 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
I nominate the Suzuki SJ410.

Didn't go, didn't stop and the handling was positively dangerous.

Awful, simply awful.

veccy208

1,320 posts

101 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
ch108 said:
Trabi601 said:
I'm intrigued by the 'dangerously slow' posts. Nothing available in the last 20 years or so could be described as 'dangerously slow'.

If you want dangerously slow, you really need to try driving a car with 26bhp.
Dangerously slow probably translates to "didn't adapt driving style for something slower than I'm used to driving".

Even hire/courtesy cars I've had including a Matiz and a Ford Ka couldn't be described as dangerous provided they were driven in the manner they were designed for.
Hit the nail on the head with that! People must jump out of their Mercedes or BMW and expect a 1l corsa to handle the same way. Intelligent, forward thinking gear changes can greatly improve how a small engine pulls up a hill/accelerates etc.
If it feels wobbly or crashy that's probably a good indication your driving too fast.
If the gears are notchy, give the gear change time and stop treating it like a crash box.
I've driven vintage tractors on the roads without feeling 'dangerously slow' so I highly doubt any car is.

lta95

6 posts

107 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
1.0 6N2 Polo. Absolutely mundane, extremely uncomfortable and a woeful engine which gave up the ghost at 80k.

Terzo123

4,311 posts

208 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
Theophany said:
Same answer as the courtesy car thread. Matiz!
Ha! This was my first thought. Hired one in Lanzarote as a cheap run about for a few days. Horrible, horrible POS.

The Nissan Cash dodge we leased for three years comes a close second. Crap asthmatic 1.6 petrol engine. Uninspiring white goods motoring.

sparks_E39

12,738 posts

213 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
spyker138 said:
612 Scaglietti. Too big, too heavy, horrid horrid F1 gear change and ugly.
The worst car you have driven is a modern Ferrari!

Probably my old H reg 1.1 Fiesta, although it wasn't terrible.. it's probably the worst I've driven. I don't think I've driven a truly awful car.

RammyMP

6,752 posts

153 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
RammyMP said:
Got a Fiat Punto hire car at the moment, it's woeful. The boot release is a tt, build quality is ste and the further you push the accelerator the louder it gets, doesn't go any quicker though!

Why do people buy these cars when you can get something like a Seat Ibiza for similar money?
And the air con is ste

G321

575 posts

204 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
Byker28i said:
veccy208 said:
I find these threads about awful cars a bit over exaggerated to say the least.
Someone mentions a p12 Primera! My dad has owned one of these for years, great firm cornering car. Most certainly doesn't wallow. the 1.8 engine is a great engine (not a power house but perky enough for the type of car.) He has driven it for 13yrs or so and put 160k on it and all its needed is a couple of link arms and an exhaust. Definitely the no1 most reliable car I have ever come across.
We had a 2litre petrol one, bought it at 3 years old from a main dealer, never did more than 24mpg yet had no performance. Big, comfy, well spec'd, but if it had been either more frugal or had some performance I could have forgiven it.

We had it 9 years, it had 155K miles on it when we traded it in, although it did have a new engine at 60K miles, as at the first service they forgot to put oil in it when they took it for a test drive.
I had a 2 litre auto Primera which I bought off a mate for £300 and sold a year later for £300. Not the most economic of motors but it was so comfy. The only downside was that it was white so if I ever drove round town centres at night people would try and hail me...

Drummond Baize

200 posts

95 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
2 cars immediately spring to mind. Both British and both BL/Rover.

The first was a Mini. 998cc's of power mated to an automatic box which sucked all the fun out of driving a Mini.

Second was a Maestro. Your classic "I need a car sharpish and a mate is selling a cheap one" scenario. Woeful. A plastic gear linkage broke which meant I effectively lost a couple of gears (invluding reverse) which actually made it more interesting to drive.

Josho

748 posts

97 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
Peugeot 1007 with the S-Tronic box.

Love the sliding doors when parking, the 1.6 has a reasonable amount of power but the gearbox is so bad it makes it the worse thing in the world. The delay in changing gear and finding the clutch biting point is horrendous.

My mates find it hilarious in the sense that it looks like a granny doing lift off oversteer when I drive it.

Dannbodge

2,163 posts

121 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
A 16 plate Skoda Octavia with the 1.2 TSI lump.

Made some interesting noises (Dump Valve and lots of turbo chatter) but as it had the most uncomfortable and depressing interior ever. Was as dull to drive too. Was such poverty spec that it had black plastic mirrors and door handles, the only thing it seemed to have is DAB radio and wheels.

Luckily it was a hire car and I managed to swap it for a high spec'd passat instead.

Ian_UK1

1,514 posts

194 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
Vauxhall Vectra - I had one of these forced on me as a company car in 1997. Absolutely hateful PoS with no redeeming features whatsoever:

Gutless, thirsty, droning, 4-pot dog of an engine.
Lousy, obstructive gear-change. Over damped action with too much mass in the linkage.
Completely dead steering. No chatter and no feedback (change in weight) to let you know what the front wheels were doing.
Appalling bouncy chassis. Over-sprung and under-damped (or maybe the other way round; it was too bad to tell)!
Terminal understeer even if you trail-braked into a corner to keep more weight on the nose.
Possibly the most boringly-styled car ever.
Dire interior, poor driving position and instant backache from the improperly-contoured seats.
'Repmobile' image. The only car people ever took the piss out of me for driving!

I always wished I'd wake-up to find it had caught fire and died!



coppice

8,593 posts

144 months

Wednesday 1st June 2016
quotequote all
You lads are spoiled youngsters; you missed the delights of a 1970 something Skoda 110L(unbelievably bad steering and engine which would be defeated by rice pudding skin ) Viva HA (snappy gearchange but engine a thrashy horror producing about 30bhp on a good day ) SC 100 Suzuki (directional stability of a helium balloon yet unaccountably popular with some anoraks) Marina TC (there aren't the words )and , of course , the mighty Allegro and Maxi. The latter's gearchange was operable entirely, and solely by prayer and its engine mounts were made from pre chewed liquorice .