RE: Renault Clio R.S.16 - full story

RE: Renault Clio R.S.16 - full story

Author
Discussion

only1ian

688 posts

194 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
Its not as fast as a polo gti

M1C

1,833 posts

111 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
I'm thinking...

£40k is stilly money. But if they only making...like...very few...they may sell at that price. I think a small number of people would pay that.

If they are making a few thousand..£40k is way too much.

Even £30k sounds like a lot. But £30k seems to be the 'hot hatch' going rate these days....

Really like the car though.

mattyc69

330 posts

152 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
Composite Guru said:
£40k. No thanks. More ludicrous price than a Civic Type R.

I'd rather spend £40k on a proper marque.
The new type r is not cheap but also not expensive. The original ep3 type r with air con and metallic paint was £17500 in 2001, put this into an inflation calculator and that's 27k in today's money. The ep3 was very raw for that price you got a CD player and that's about it. So a new basic non gt type r is £29k with reverse camera and a few other nice touches. So in fact it's not really that expensive after all.


I think this clio will be awesome now it has the power to go with its good looks, liquid yellow for me please!

Spurtboy

15 posts

190 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
Wait - so its rear bench has been removed? So do the rear doors still open?

Guvernator

13,151 posts

165 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
The article seems to suggest the rear seats are gone. My question would be, if this does go into production will it retain the back seats? It's a wonderful idea but without back-seats it will become yet another 2 seater hot hatch irrelevance.

rwindmill

430 posts

158 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
That is exactly how the new Clio RS should have looked from the start. In liquid yellow it is now a worthy continuation of the breed.
I agree with others on here though about the price, £40K is very close to M2 money, and you just know that the M2 is going to be a better drive, and maintain its value.

Renault should make the bodykit available for standard Clio RS's. It would go a long way in addressing the lack-lustre appearance, and make it at least look like you were driving a sporty car, even if it doesnt feel like one

j8bbk

95 posts

96 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
If you want something this small and really fast the Audi S1 is the way to go.. Quicker and not French!

Martin_Hx

3,955 posts

198 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
M1C said:
I'm thinking...

£40k is stilly money. But if they only making...like...very few...they may sell at that price. I think a small number of people would pay that.

If they are making a few thousand..£40k is way too much.

Even £30k sounds like a lot. But £30k seems to be the 'hot hatch' going rate these days....

Really like the car though.
Honda did the same with this, 20 avalaible and sold them all so im sure in small numbers they would shift them @ 40k!

http://www.pistonheads.com/regulars/blog/civic-typ...

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
j8bbk said:
If you want something this small and really fast the Audi S1 is the way to go.. Quicker and not French!
Why would you want your hot hatch to not be French?

D200

514 posts

147 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
This car sounds great but I do agree 40k [if that will be the price- nothing confirmed yet] is just too expensive.

If it was say 32k [a lot for a fwd. Clio] but same as stuff like optioned Civic Type R, Golf Club sport, Focus RS etc it would be more acceptable

Or if it was really bespoke [e.g. RWD or 4WD] then you could see why it could be 40k, but it’s not.

As others said, if they just stuck the body kit, wheels and seats on a Clio Trophy, have option to ditch rear seats and take some sound deadening out [maybe give is a token bhp increase] etc. to lighten it a few kg that would have been suffice for most. And sell it for say 26k [nicely undercutting all the high end hot hatch competition] it would be great.

Saying that, this car will be fantastic and no doubt go down any road or lap any track faster than all the competition.


p1stonhead

25,540 posts

167 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
So without rear seats is this basically just a cup race car but road legal?

ukaskew

10,642 posts

221 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
p1stonhead said:
So without rear seats is this basically just a cup race car but road legal?
Not even close, did you read the article?

glazbagun

14,279 posts

197 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
It's nice but it's too expensive to be a bot hatch and not mental enough to be a Clio V6 instant classic.

vanschpunk

143 posts

212 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
mpit said:
Renault Clio at Cayman money. jester

It looks good, but you'd have to be mad to pay £40k for one.
There is morons paying north of £10k for a rough Sierra Cosworth these days!!

Sadly "Das ist Leiben"

On topic this wee Clio is class

Tickle

4,915 posts

204 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
j8bbk said:
If you want something this small and really fast the Audi S1 is the way to go.. Quicker and not French!
Yes, audi are the benchmark for small hot hatches.

The Dieppe RS factory is well known for churning out bland cars rolleyes

Gandahar

9,600 posts

128 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
Number of Clio EDC turbo 200 thingies seen on the road by me since they launched it

0


Number of Fiesta ST's with some Mountune bits


100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000



Renault fecked up big time with 5 doors and a crap gearshift. Now trying to claw back some kudos.

FAIL



IainR

71 posts

181 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
If they make this - even at £40k - I'm in. Have registered my interest.

The car definition of greater than the sum of its parts. Hopefully.

ZX10R NIN

27,594 posts

125 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
If VW can charge 40k for a Clubsport S then 40k for the extra work to get the Megane engine in seems fair.

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
ZX10R NIN said:
If VW can charge 40k for a Clubsport S then 40k for the extra work to get the Megane engine in seems fair.
Indeed. And Renault is a damn sight more successful at producing cracking hot hatches than VW.

The Vambo

6,643 posts

141 months

Friday 27th May 2016
quotequote all
Gandahar said:
Number of Clio EDC turbo 200 thingies seen on the road by me since they launched it

0


Number of Fiesta ST's with some Mountune bits


100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000



Renault fecked up big time with 5 doors and a crap gearshift. Now trying to claw back some kudos.

FAIL
You must be new the this car enthusiast thing.

Clio 2 172 ph1, released to a very lukewarm reception. Renault iterated and iterated and ended up with the Clio Trophy one of the finest hot hatches ever.

Clio 3, exactly the same process and outcome.

And the Megane 2.

And the Megane 3 except the initial car nailed it, they kept improving it though.

History suggests that the current gigantic Clio will end up as a very good drivers car.