RE: Secrets of Subaru's IoM TT record car
Discussion
Slippydiff said:
On the contrary, for a near 1200kg "tank" based on a lot of 8 year old components, from a very tightly regulated series (the WRC), running on sub-optimal tyres (both construction and width) with the bare minimum of practice, it's little short of phenomenal how quick it is. That it's based on a production shell with minimal aerodynamic appendages, makes it even more incredible.
Of course, in the grand scheme of things it's not fast per se, I've no doubt a monster 991 Cup car run with 4wd, a tweaked 991 Turbo S engine putting out 850-900hp, adaptive suspension and Walter Rohrl behind the wheel would be monstrously quick, as would Loeb behind the wheel of his Pikes Peak car modified for the TT course etc. But none of that detracts from the fact that this is herculean undertaking by Higgins in a much compromised car with little in the way of practice time.
It certainly is and I'd say is on par to the effort and commitment Tony Pond undertook with that 827i Vitesse. Of course, in the grand scheme of things it's not fast per se, I've no doubt a monster 991 Cup car run with 4wd, a tweaked 991 Turbo S engine putting out 850-900hp, adaptive suspension and Walter Rohrl behind the wheel would be monstrously quick, as would Loeb behind the wheel of his Pikes Peak car modified for the TT course etc. But none of that detracts from the fact that this is herculean undertaking by Higgins in a much compromised car with little in the way of practice time.
991 RSR
Slippydiff said:
London424 said:
In the grand scheme of things this car really isn't very fast.
On the contrary, for a near 1200kg "tank" based on a lot of 8 year old components, from a very tightly regulated series (the WRC), running on sub-optimal tyres (both construction and width) with the bare minimum of practice, it's little short of phenomenal how quick it is. That it's based on a production shell with minimal aerodynamic appendages, makes it even more incredible.Of course, in the grand scheme of things it's not fast per se, I've no doubt a monster 991 Cup car run with 4wd, a tweaked 991 Turbo S engine putting out 850-900hp, adaptive suspension and Walter Rohrl behind the wheel would be monstrously quick, as would Loeb behind the wheel of his Pikes Peak car modified for the TT course etc. But none of that detracts from the fact that this is herculean undertaking by Higgins in a much compromised car with little in the way of practice time.
Put it around a race track or the ring and what sort of lap time extra would you think? 10%, 20%, 30%?
Welshbeef said:
It certainly is and I'd say is on par to the effort and commitment Tony Pond undertook with that 827i Vitesse.
991 RSR
I watched some of the Pond/Vitesse in-car last night. Pond was so laconic about the whole thing (but he appeared that way about his rallying in general, but that easy going exterior belied what was a steely competitor)991 RSR
I can't for one minute think the Vitesse was in any way nice to drive at that speed (the speedo spent plenty of time nudging 150mph indicated (and they were FWD to boot IIRC ?)
Thought the Cup car would be narrower than the RSR, and whilst the RSR suspension is bespoke, it's designed to scrape the Tarmac, hence the Cup car proposition
Rover 827i Vitesse
1427kg
177bhp
So 124bhp per tonne
0-60mph 8 seconds
1/4 mile 16.6 seconds
2.7 Ltr engine
Claimed top speed 220km/h or 137mph
Achieved a IOM TT average lap time 100mph or 73% of its top speed.
2014 Siburu could do 160mph and did a 117mph lap time so 73% of its top speed
The latest Suburu can do 180mph and has done a 128mph lap time so 71% of its top speed
Those numbers are pretty consistent.... Especially as the last one has one more run tomorrow - for it to be 73% of its top speed it would need to do 131.4mph or about 27secobds quicker.
Interesting.
1427kg
177bhp
So 124bhp per tonne
0-60mph 8 seconds
1/4 mile 16.6 seconds
2.7 Ltr engine
Claimed top speed 220km/h or 137mph
Achieved a IOM TT average lap time 100mph or 73% of its top speed.
2014 Siburu could do 160mph and did a 117mph lap time so 73% of its top speed
The latest Suburu can do 180mph and has done a 128mph lap time so 71% of its top speed
Those numbers are pretty consistent.... Especially as the last one has one more run tomorrow - for it to be 73% of its top speed it would need to do 131.4mph or about 27secobds quicker.
Interesting.
ant leigh said:
thegreenhell said:
Definitely FWD. Not sure about the LSD on those old barges though. I be surprised if it had one.
I had the Vitesse 820 Turbo for a few years. Great car btw.That had an LSD so I assumed the 827 did.
Nanook said:
Welshbeef said:
Do you really need LSD in a car with 124bhp per tonne? And N/A too?
What do you think an LSD does?But it's not a cheap option and the Rover 827i Vitesse didn't have one - I fact not many did. For Rover if they did for it then yet another reason why they went down the pan fitting unnecessary costly parts wasting margin when joe public doesn't want it.
ant leigh said:
thegreenhell said:
Definitely FWD. Not sure about the LSD on those old barges though. I be surprised if it had one.
I had the Vitesse 820 Turbo for a few years. Great car btw.That had an LSD so I assumed the 827 did.
Didn't the Cavalier GSI turbo demolish this in every way which in turn was bent over by the Sierra Saphire rwd Cosworth?
PhillipM said:
There's a lot of F1 cars running LSD's and I don't see many in the snow*...
Out of all the production cars made Excl purpose built off road I'd wager you'd be looking sub 1% of all cars made come with it standard. It is an unnecessary additional basic spec fit- Shutup Redbull, that doesn't count
Welshbeef said:
Sorry your talking about the ultimate in race technology vs say a Citroen C1. Really? Are you going to try to have that debate? Nope.
You're talking about racing it with access to the parts bin - of which an LSD was available off the shelf to fit.You'd fit an LSD to a C1 too if you were racing it.
Welshbeef said:
ant leigh said:
thegreenhell said:
Definitely FWD. Not sure about the LSD on those old barges though. I be surprised if it had one.
I had the Vitesse 820 Turbo for a few years. Great car btw.That had an LSD so I assumed the 827 did.
Didn't the Cavalier GSI turbo demolish this in every way which in turn was bent over by the Sierra Saphire rwd Cosworth?
PhillipM said:
Welshbeef said:
Sorry your talking about the ultimate in race technology vs say a Citroen C1. Really? Are you going to try to have that debate? Nope.
You're talking about racing it with access to the parts bin - of which an LSD was available off the shelf to fit.You'd fit an LSD to a C1 too if you were racing it.
Not sure the point your trying to make.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff