Petition to stop practice of "surface dressing" on roads

Petition to stop practice of "surface dressing" on roads

Author
Discussion

Belge

Original Poster:

6 posts

156 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
As someone who is constantly infuriated by the practice of "surface dressing" (application of bitumen and small stones to resurface roads), and the mess it causes to paintwork, chipped windscreens and the other dangers to bikers, I came across this petition to put a stop to this ineffective and wasteful method.
Having pestered my local council numerous times with nonsense responses in return and no action, I decided it would be great to get fellow motorists supporting the cause and adding pressure via the relevant minister.
Please, if you care about your pride and joy and fellow road users' safety (not to mention our tax money!), then please click on the following link to sign this petition:
https://www.change.org/p/highways-agency-let-s-sto...


Edited by Belge on Friday 24th June 16:19

mp3manager

4,254 posts

196 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
Epic lurking!

Willy Nilly

12,511 posts

167 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
I'm not sure about everyone else, but I suspect a few pock marks in the front of most peoples car is somewhere toward the bottom of the list of peoples concerns right now.

bigandclever

13,775 posts

238 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
That petition is going to the wrong people. The Highways Agency (which has been called Highways England since last year) has nothing to do with how a council fixes their roads.

Belge

Original Poster:

6 posts

156 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
Good to know, so who should it go to?

TheJimi

24,950 posts

243 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
Willy Nilly said:
I'm not sure about everyone else, but I suspect a few pock marks in the front of most peoples car is somewhere toward the bottom of the list of peoples concerns right now.
Does that mean that because it's not a the top of our collective list of concerns, that the issue doesn't warrant attention?

What a ridiculous concept.

Further, if you're alluding to Brexit, what do you expect everyone to be doing, such that they are too pressed to sign a petition that may strike a chord with them?

Monkeylegend

26,326 posts

231 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
If the danger to cyclists reference was removed from the title you might get more support on here, that's like red rag hehe

swisstoni

16,949 posts

279 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
Just get a great big front number plate.

ikarl

3,730 posts

199 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
Just get a great big front number plate.
clap

bigandclever

13,775 posts

238 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
I suppose the person is right (Patrick McLoughlin MP) but it should be higher up to the Department for Transport. I think the problem though is that individual councils decide how they spend their money on road repairs.

GreatGranny

9,124 posts

226 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
Local Highway Authorities are responsible and you have no chance getting all or any of them to stop the practice.
There's a problems because drivers travel too fast after application thus throwing up stones and affecting visibility.
Its only a problem for about 24-48 hours until the chippings are either pressed in to the bitumen or brushed up with a road sweeper.
It improves skid resistance and the life of the carriageway surfacing thus saving the LHA money. They are financially stretched as it is.

Belge

Original Poster:

6 posts

156 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
I'll drive at a snail's pace after the dressing has been applied and still get paint chips and tar on the car. Councils often use contractors who are not checked as to whether they have swept sufficiently, which means you are left with debris for weeks after application. Councils may be cash-strapped, but if they laid and repaired roads properly in the first place then they wouldn't waste money on an annual basis for such a temporary improvement (not to mention what they pay in compensation for damaged cars). Typical short-sightedness...

saaby93

32,038 posts

178 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
GreatGranny said:
Local Highway Authorities are responsible and you have no chance getting all or any of them to stop the practice.
There's a problems because drivers travel too fast after application thus throwing up stones and affecting visibility.
Its only a problem for about 24-48 hours until the chippings are either pressed in to the bitumen or brushed up with a road sweeper.
It improves skid resistance and the life of the carriageway surfacing
Only if the chippings manage to get pressed into the surface before theyre swept away hehe

Riley Blue

20,949 posts

226 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
Is there a cost effective alternative?

theshrew

6,008 posts

184 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
I look after my belongings especially my cars and bike. This re surfacing is a pet hate of mine.

However has a petition ever actually achieved anything.

Lordglenmorangie

3,053 posts

205 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
To the comments of drivers going to fast. Our village high street was surface dressed today I drove 30 miles parked up to find my tyres had these chippings still into treads. Mind you it has covered up the sunk man holes and covered the sorry state of the road surface. Dressing is the correct term for this practice!

Higgs boson

1,094 posts

153 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
It is, if carried out correctly, a cost-effective way of prolonging the life of the carriageway.
The practice is unlikely to abandoned.

saaby93

32,038 posts

178 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
Riley Blue said:
Is there a cost effective alternative?
Use one of those machines that lays road surface properly with a truck stuck to the front pouring in the gravel
Takes about the same length of time ( but no weeks either side with slow chippings) same materials better job
Surely its more cost effective?

Riley Blue

20,949 posts

226 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
Riley Blue said:
Is there a cost effective alternative?
Use one of those machines that lays road surface properly with a truck stuck to the front pouring in the gravel
Takes about the same length of time ( but no weeks either side with slow chippings) same materials better job
Surely its more cost effective?
Don't you have to remove the old surface first to do that? I must pay more attention to road mending...

smithyithy

7,223 posts

118 months

Friday 24th June 2016
quotequote all
This is becoming less common anyway.

In our strategic network contract with HE, we're using a newer product that is 20mm thick and applied as a sort of slurry, so the chippings are already mixed in the bitumen, meaning no loose stones.

Local authorities are catching up too, in our area at least they've moved from simply laying the stones and having it rolled by traffic and periodically swept,, to actually sealing them ~24 hours after application with a sort of emulsion, so the period of loose stones is very short and the resulting surface looks and feels much more like an asphalt.

The old system is crap, I agree, but it's improving and the thin overlay system we're using especially is pretty good.