RE: Lotus Evora 400: even lighter, even dearer

RE: Lotus Evora 400: even lighter, even dearer

Friday 19th August 2016

Lotus Evora 400: even lighter, even dearer

Just add lightness, says Lotus, if you can afford it



Because it weighs less than 1,400kg, Lotus insists the Evora 400 is a radically lightweight 2+2 sportscar. Well, 1,395kg is admirable for a 400hp machine, but a Porsche 911 Carrera S is only 45kg heavier and that has 420hp. As Jean-Marc Gales seems to have inherited Colin Chapman's mantra about light being right, this minuscule weight advantage clearly isn't good enough. So you can now optionally take out yet more mass from your Evora 400. If you can afford it.


The fanciest weight-saving feature is a new carbon pack, which at least gives Evora 400 owners a bit of visual differentiation for their £6,500 spend. Admittedly hand-made, it includes a carbon fibre front splitter and access panel, roof panel, rear wing centre, rear diffuser and door mirror caps. Presumably the carbon roof lowers the centre of mass a teeny bit; carbon door mirrors could see suburban roads littered with carbon shards, F1-like, when you thwack them against a parked car.

Total weight saving: 5kg. That's £1,300 per kg saved. Ouch. A far better return for your money comes from optioning the titanium sports exhaust system (£5,500) and the lithium ion battery (£1,350. We repeat, £1,350). They in total each save 10kg, which works out at a far better value £550 per kg for the exhaust and a bargain £135 per kg for the battery (it's a £1,350 bargain. We repeat, a £1,350 bargain).


"We are now giving customers an opportunity to drive an even lighter and more responsive car," says Gales: and if you want the ultimate in lightness and responsiveness, Lotus will allow you to delete the air conditioning and 2+2 rear seats. Generously, it'll even allow you to do this for free. In ultimate skinny guise, the Evora kerbwight drops to just 1,353kg, pretty skinny indeed for such a potent car.

Best not spoil it at the coffee shop, then: because Lotus engineers have even crafted a neat ultra-lightweight optional cupholder and oddments tray to sit between the front seats. Yes, it's been weighed: just 120g, "and demonstrates perfectly how Lotus will bend to market demands whilst at the same time ensuring it core values of lightweight and purity are maintained". Skinny lattes all round!

 

 

Author
Discussion

Soupr

Original Poster:

21 posts

112 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
120kg for a cupholder?! Get the screwdriver out and that's a huge amount of weight saved for free!

tankplanker

2,479 posts

279 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
120kg for a cup holder? Is that meant to be 120g?

WCZ

10,513 posts

194 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
ferrari option prices @ lotus, they've lost the plot.

also last time I bought a racing battery it was £150 and weighed fk all. how can they justify £1,350?

bluerainer101

38 posts

145 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
120kg for a cupholder??? I think Lotus may have mised a trick with this!

johnwilliams77

8,308 posts

103 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
tankplanker said:
120kg for a cup holder? Is that meant to be 120g?
No
They definitely have a 120kg cup holder

Ikobo

511 posts

149 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
This reads to me as if the writer is giving the information in quite a sneering tone, which I don't think other manufacturers are on the end of when offering expensive carbon tat options to their cars. Personally I wouldn't want any of it on my own 400, but I doubt these trinkets would be receiving such derision on a certain other marque.

kdfisher

6 posts

218 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
I can't help but thinking Lotus have lost their way.....I've had two Exiges, wonderful looking things alongside the usual Lotus dynamics. But the Evora still has the ugly bluff front nose. They should have taken a leaf from McLaren's book on the MP12....the first bland version gave way something far more purposeful and easy on the eye.

tankplanker

2,479 posts

279 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
johnwilliams77 said:
No
They definitely have a 120kg cup holder
Oh awesome, I hope it adds to the torsional rigidity of the chassis.

Impasse

15,099 posts

241 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
Of course, you are forced to buy these options. Forced to.

richardaucock

204 posts

163 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
Ikobo said:
This reads to me as if the writer is giving the information in quite a sneering tone, which I don't think other manufacturers are on the end of when offering expensive carbon tat options to their cars. Personally I wouldn't want any of it on my own 400, but I doubt these trinkets would be receiving such derision on a certain other marque.
I'm all for adding lightness but the prices do seem a bit steep! Certainly not deriding the opportunity to make a great car even lighter and thus even better, but it seems an expensive way of doing it for a car that already costs £73k...

over steer

121 posts

206 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
Can't see what the fuss is about, it's more or less the same price point as Reverie components would cost. As for the price of the battery, funny that no-one bats an eye when Porsche charge that much for theirs... http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=110...whistle

AH33

2,066 posts

135 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
Still looks horrible!

Lotus, get your mojo back

over steer

121 posts

206 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
richardaucock said:
Ikobo said:
This reads to me as if the writer is giving the information in quite a sneering tone, which I don't think other manufacturers are on the end of when offering expensive carbon tat options to their cars. Personally I wouldn't want any of it on my own 400, but I doubt these trinkets would be receiving such derision on a certain other marque.
I'm all for adding lightness but the prices do seem a bit steep! Certainly not deriding the opportunity to make a great car even lighter and thus even better, but it seems an expensive way of doing it for a car that already costs £73k...
Pricing is subjective, and Options are by their own nature Optional. No one is compelled to buy them. The tone of the article is, however, out of line.

richardaucock

204 posts

163 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
tankplanker said:
johnwilliams77 said:
No
They definitely have a 120kg cup holder
Oh awesome, I hope it adds to the torsional rigidity of the chassis.
Corrected! Although if you're going to add in a 120kg cupholder, adding it so centrally and so low within the chassis can only be a good thing...

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
AH33 said:
Still looks horrible!

Lotus, get your mojo back
What? Are you kidding?


AH33

2,066 posts

135 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
yonex said:
What? Are you kidding?

Nope, the proportions are all wrong. It looks bad from every angle to me. The headlights are particularly horrible.

The S2 Exige, now there is one they did right.


Hungrymc

6,649 posts

137 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
Slightly strange article. It's not unheard of for a sports car manufacturer to price weight saving options very strongly.

It's a bit strongly priced for me, but undoubtedly makes a very nice car even nicer.... What's not to like?

Dave Hedgehog

14,545 posts

204 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
Take off your coat and shoes and have a poo, that would be 5kgs saved for free smile

Car looks stunning IMO so much nicer than the Elise (MEH) and exige

peter450

1,650 posts

233 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
richardaucock said:
Ikobo said:
This reads to me as if the writer is giving the information in quite a sneering tone, which I don't think other manufacturers are on the end of when offering expensive carbon tat options to their cars. Personally I wouldn't want any of it on my own 400, but I doubt these trinkets would be receiving such derision on a certain other marque.
I'm all for adding lightness but the prices do seem a bit steep! Certainly not deriding the opportunity to make a great car even lighter and thus even better, but it seems an expensive way of doing it for a car that already costs £73k...
It is steep, but no worse than anyone else is charging for this stuff

It's funny this article pops up now I was just thinking about my old Lotus Excel this morning.

Build quality was so so, I did not find it that comfortable on long trips and when a time came that I had to use it as my sole vehicle it did not exactly slip into that role with aplomb but when all was said and done I enjoyed driving it (just not for long periods) and for all its faults I liked it and was feeling super nostalgic just a couple of hours ago

This is clearly a sign I need another Lotus !!!

They might be expensive for what they are, but them their also cheap for what they are if that makes sense !!!

kambites

67,543 posts

221 months

Friday 19th August 2016
quotequote all
AH33 said:
The S2 Exige, now there is one they did right.
Hmm, I think the S2 Exige/Elise is a rather ugly car. I rather like the Evora's styling, or at least I did before the facelift.