RE: Lotus Evora 400: even lighter, even dearer
Discussion
Lotuslover669 said:
again with the insults, no i recognized a pattern of behaviour that i witnessed first hand on the lotus forums targeting this article and its writer, and decided enough is enough, you are not gonna harass a writer on a 3rd party website just because you dont like his opinion.
and quit it with the insults this is really getting out of hand....control your emotions plz.
Seems I was right, but do stop crying. You don't appear to have brought anything of value with you either to here or to the Lotus Forum. I wonder why you felt your voice was so important that it needed to be heard.and quit it with the insults this is really getting out of hand....control your emotions plz.
Impasse said:
Seems I was right, but do stop crying. You don't appear to have brought anything of value with you either to here or to the Lotus Forum. I wonder why you felt your voice was so important that it needed to be heard.
how would you know what I brought into the Lotus forum unless you as well are a TLF member, your previous comments clearly indicate that you are, and sorry for ruining your plans of spamming an article writers opinion with statements of bias, unprofessionalism. just breath no one is crying, just the insult spam is getting abit immaturish , you are supposed to be a married man with kids, act like one please.Lotuslover669 said:
how would you know what I brought into the Lotus forum unless you as well are a TLF member, your previous comments clearly indicate that you are, and sorry for ruining your plans of spamming an article writers opinion with statements of bias, unprofessionalism. just breath no one is crying, just the insult spam is getting abit immaturish , you are supposed to be a married man with kids, act like one please.
I've just read the links you doofus. They appear to have now had your input removed, so I can only presume they got fed up with your constant crying. It's notable that you don't refute your contributions to PH being utterly worthless. At least we can agree on that point.Impasse said:
I've just read the links you doofus. They appear to have now had your input removed, so I can only presume they got fed up with your constant crying. It's notable that you don't refute your contributions to PH being utterly worthless. At least we can agree on that point.
It was not worthy of response, my statements stand on their own legs and can be judged accordingly on PH , other than the edited and deleted comments on TLF which is the definition of bias, and the fakery of accounts by havoc is utterly unacceptable , but then again you TLF fanboys really love to sidetrack when it suits you.topic "Price point of options for evora 400 " <<---
Impasse said:
Oh don't worry your crying eyes about that.
cool, so whats the next plan of action on the next evora 400 review you boys wont like, so i can register from now ?first it was chris, then richard..who is next? matt? or maybe the boys at motortrend? 5th gear? topgear? anygear?
the arguments are usually the same, we are a small company, we are a custom car maker, we dont have the budget, we need a cushion etc etc..
Edited by Lotuslover669 on Saturday 20th August 00:51
Lotuslover669 said:
topic "Price point of options for evora 400 " <<---
And your first post was .... garbage company, something about quality and being banned from other forums.Right oh.
I have tried to respond to some of your points and explain where the different perspectives may come from. But it's clearly wasted time.
Hungrymc said:
And your first post was .... garbage company, something about quality and being banned from other forums.
Right oh.
I have tried to respond to some of your points and explain where the different perspectives may come from. But it's clearly wasted time.
and your first point is about how strange the article is, why is it strange? is it because you disagree with it?Right oh.
I have tried to respond to some of your points and explain where the different perspectives may come from. But it's clearly wasted time.
strange
strānj/Submit
adjective
1.
unusual or surprising in a way that is unsettling or hard to understand.
how was this article unusual? or unsettling or hard to understand? please explain.
its is an evora review, from the authors experience and judgment, written in english.
doesn't fall under the definition of "strange" unless you came here with a certain preconceived agenda.
Lotuslover669 said:
screenshot plz
I won't indulge you as you are very, very dull, and I am rather busier than you are interesting. Every review I have seen of the (probably very competent new range of Boxsters and Caymans) has (as expected) been dominated by comments about the new engine and it's relative lack of character. Interesting how that contradicts the reviews of the Evora 400. Anyway, I'm sure either is fine if you want a Porsche. They are decent motor cars if you want for such a thing. But why do you care?
Porsche911R, you do the same on every Lotus thread, and it's quite weird. Why do you hate something so much? I presume you aren't even old enough to drive a car judging by your writing style. And even if you're not 14 years old (which seems very unlikely) why do you care? You seem like a plonker to everyone, including Porsche cognoscente - we are all car fans, surely?
bobo79 said:
I won't indulge you as you are very, very dull, and I am rather busier than you are interesting.
Every review I have seen of the (probably very competent new range of Boxsters and Caymans) has (as expected) been dominated by comments about the new engine and it's relative lack of character. Interesting how that contradicts the reviews of the Evora 400. Anyway, I'm sure either is fine if you want a Porsche. They are decent motor cars if you want for such a thing. But why do you care?
Porsche911R, you do the same on every Lotus thread, and it's quite weird. Why do you hate something so much? I presume you aren't even old enough to drive a car judging by your writing style. And even if you're not 14 years old (which seems very unlikely) why do you care? You seem like a plonker to everyone, including Porsche cognoscente - we are all car fans, surely?
let me use the same lotus logic , lotus members use on me.Every review I have seen of the (probably very competent new range of Boxsters and Caymans) has (as expected) been dominated by comments about the new engine and it's relative lack of character. Interesting how that contradicts the reviews of the Evora 400. Anyway, I'm sure either is fine if you want a Porsche. They are decent motor cars if you want for such a thing. But why do you care?
Porsche911R, you do the same on every Lotus thread, and it's quite weird. Why do you hate something so much? I presume you aren't even old enough to drive a car judging by your writing style. And even if you're not 14 years old (which seems very unlikely) why do you care? You seem like a plonker to everyone, including Porsche cognoscente - we are all car fans, surely?
"15 posts?? lol came here to troll" , which in this actual case you really are,
you claimed something - couldn't back it up, then proceeded to target me instead of the points I made. smart.
real talk : now every car fan club or forum has its few bad apples, but when these bad apples are nurtured by the "system" they start to belive that the bubble they live in is the world, and that nothing exists beyond it, then when confronted by a differing opinion from that which is in the bubble they are quick to gather in anger, so who do we really blame? the apples or the system?(maybe thats too deep for you) nevermind. let me simplify it
you make bad talk
bad talk is waste time
momma should teach you no make bad talk
i not bad man
I opinion different from you
is okay
world is good
you are safe
sleep baby sleep
Edited by Lotuslover669 on Saturday 20th August 01:18
Lotuslover669 said:
let me use the same lotus logic , lotus members use on me.
Sigh. Lotuslover669 said:
"15 posts?? lol came here to troll" , which in this actual case you really are,
We all know you have posted here many times under multiple names, each post as boring as the next.Lotuslover669 said:
you claimed something - couldn't back it up, then proceeded to target me instead of the points I made. smart.
Other than unprovable accusation that you were 14, no I didn't. That you are dull is empirical.Lotuslover669 said:
and your first point is about how strange the article is, why is it strange? is it because you disagree with it?
strange
str?nj/Submit
adjective
1.
unusual or surprising in a way that is unsettling or hard to understand.
how was this article unusual? or unsettling or hard to understand? please explain.
its is an evora review, from the authors experience and judgment, written in english.
doesn't fall under the definition of "strange" unless you came here with a certain preconceived agenda.
I've explained several times. I found it strange that the article was written with such an odd and sarcastic manner. When the subject matter is an options policy that many OEMs use and so not particularly unusual and warranting some odd reporting style. That's what I found odd, I suspect the writer is trying to be witty and to liven up a bit of a none story. Is a poor attempt if so (just my opinion and I'm sure he'll lose no sleep over my views just as I won't over his).strange
str?nj/Submit
adjective
1.
unusual or surprising in a way that is unsettling or hard to understand.
how was this article unusual? or unsettling or hard to understand? please explain.
its is an evora review, from the authors experience and judgment, written in english.
doesn't fall under the definition of "strange" unless you came here with a certain preconceived agenda.
So I've answered your point. Which was only ever a distraction on your side as I drew attention to you asking to get the thread back on topic, when your first, and most subsequent posts have been totally off topic.
Do you wish to respond to the points in the previous few posts? Only if you really want to discuss the relative merits of these brands and cars, and what motivates buyers to make different choices to each other. No problem if you'd rather not, I understand.
Hungrymc said:
I've explained several times. I found it strange that the article was written with such an odd and sarcastic manner. When the subject matter is an options policy that many OEMs use and so not particularly unusual and warranting some odd reporting style. That's what I found odd, I suspect the writer is trying to be witty and to liven up a bit of a none story. Is a poor attempt if so (just my opinion and I'm sure he'll lose no sleep over my views just as I won't over his).
So I've answered your point. Which was only ever a distraction on your side as I drew attention to you asking to get the thread back on topic, when your first, and most subsequent posts have been totally off topic.
Do you wish to respond to the points in the previous few posts? Only if you really want to discuss the relative merits of these brands and cars, and what motivates buyers to make different choices to each other. No problem if you'd rather not, I understand.
I have had to go offtopic to respond to particular attacks or accusations from the lotus community as you can clearly see, but i am also true to my words i thought you were part of the pack here such as bob or havoc part of the troll crew from lotus, and for that i APOLOGIZE, cant get any clearer than that. you seem to give respect so i will return the respect. again in all honestly i believe i answered the points you raised in that massive post that i wrote, if there are any "holes" in what i wrote please raise them and i will respond in a timely manner.So I've answered your point. Which was only ever a distraction on your side as I drew attention to you asking to get the thread back on topic, when your first, and most subsequent posts have been totally off topic.
Do you wish to respond to the points in the previous few posts? Only if you really want to discuss the relative merits of these brands and cars, and what motivates buyers to make different choices to each other. No problem if you'd rather not, I understand.
But Mr.hungrymc as you can see, there is a positive to come out of this, a sort of a cup half full situation, by targeting me the Lotus trolls lost sight of attacking the writer or the article, and if that increased his journalistic freedom by 0.00001% I am happy for that.
now again if you have any questions you feel i havent answered please ask.
and thank you.
Lotuslover669 said:
you are a troll, why should i respond to your questions? one must give respect to earn respect, and the message was directed to hungrymc, why are you butting in troll?
lol. etc.Amyway. What is your favourite Lotus, Lotuslover669? Is it the Lotus 69? Have you ever actually driven a Lotus? Or specifically an Evora? Or indeed a car?
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff