RE: Jaguar F-Pace: Review

RE: Jaguar F-Pace: Review

Author
Discussion

kambites

67,561 posts

221 months

Thursday 25th August 2016
quotequote all
If you negotiate rough farm tracks every other week I can certainly see the appeal. hehe

Maldini35

2,913 posts

188 months

Thursday 25th August 2016
quotequote all
jamieduff1981 said:
Maldini35 said:
From the article and the thread it seems the F-pace is another over- priced Jag which looks ok but falls short on build quality and interior.
Shame.
If such things matter (this is Pistonheads afterall), it also sounds like Jaguar is still the premium brand choice for people who want a nice interior but want rewarding driving dynamics more.

If you're not interested in the dynamics then fine, but some people are. Jaguar have been building cars that are better to drive than the competition on a like-for-like model basis for years now. Their development effort is bias towards steering and suspension set up. The Germans are bias towards soft touch plastics and infotainment screens.

I personally think it's mental to spend the same amount of money on a similar product that drives worse on the basis that it has more buttons inside but hey, that's my personal buying criteria talking.
I should say I have not driven or even sat in an F-Pace, I was simply summarising what the original article and a lot of people on this thread seem to be saying. I personally think it looks pretty good but don't really see the point of these type of cars. Plenty of people do though and there's nothing wrong with that.
As you say Jag should be praised for focusing on dynamics over interior finish and infotainment but a great handling SUV is like sporty stilts in my eyes - a bit pointless. It could be argued that if you really valued dynamics you probably wouldn't choose an SUV (or stilts).
And at the prices Jag is asking should we have to put up with slightly duff interiors and outdated infotainment in order to get a nice handling car? It's just a shame we can't have it all.
I should also state for the record that I'm not a fan of the Q5 or Macan either so no bias.






Clivey

5,110 posts

204 months

Friday 26th August 2016
quotequote all
fblm said:
To be fair to said passenger she did let me buy some nice track cars in exchange for getting the hateful family Touareg.
OK, I'll let you / her off! thumbup

Couldn't you convince her to give trackdays / sporty cars a try herself? My wife no longer wants boring cars (she wants a Mustang GT next)! smokin

fivepointnine

708 posts

114 months

Friday 26th August 2016
quotequote all
MonkeyMatt said:
he Maserati will start at £54k so will definitely cross over with the Jag
yeah I was looking at it form the perspective of buying them when I move back to the US eventually. There the prices for the Maserati are about $20k more than the V6sc Jag! The Jag undercuts the Macan S by about $5k there.

Hefferlump

5 posts

93 months

Friday 26th August 2016
quotequote all
langlord said:
Totally agree with the standard of interior comment, at entry spec its very good on the S its below par. Hence our order was cancelled and a macan gts arrives in a month.
Another snobby D***Head who is totally absorbed by the KrapKraut syndrome.Get a life if you are British and support our home industries! God knows we need it, before We are just another sattelite of the 4th Reich.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 26th August 2016
quotequote all
Hefferlump said:
Another snobby D***Head who is totally absorbed by the KrapKraut syndrome.Get a life if you are British and support our home industries! God knows we need it, before We are just another sattelite of the 4th Reich.
5 posts and you're calling people d1ckheads? Classy. Where was your Mazda made?

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 26th August 2016
quotequote all
Hefferlump said:
Another snobby D***Head who is totally absorbed by the KrapKraut syndrome.Get a life if you are British and support our home industries! God knows we need it, before We are just another sattelite of the 4th Reich.
Pissing myself laughing at this - clearly a troll, and a fine post.

For the record, UK car production this year expected to be 1.6M or so, highest in 10 years, 75%+ exported. Nissan in Washington makes more cars than Italy. I think we're doing just fine!

skyrover

12,671 posts

204 months

Friday 26th August 2016
quotequote all
kambites said:
skyrover said:
The body is only 76.2 inches wide
Hmm, to put that in perspective, the UK's best selling car is 67.8 inches wide excluding mirrors. The widest car in the top ten is 71.3 inches wide. Now obviously I'm not saying the F-Pace should be the same width as a Fiesta or even a C-class, but there's no getting away from the fact that it's a very wide car.
The ford fiesta is tiny though biggrin

Agreed it is wide by UK standards, but fairly par for the course in it's class.

chrispj

264 posts

143 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
skyrover said:
Agreed it is wide by UK standards, but fairly par for the course in it's class.
IMO the entire class is made up of overly fat heffalumps...

bertie

8,548 posts

284 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
chrispj said:
skyrover said:
Agreed it is wide by UK standards, but fairly par for the course in it's class.
IMO the entire class is made up of overly fat heffalumps...
JLR products are especially wide though, even compared to others in class.

Makes them so unusable.

skyrover

12,671 posts

204 months

Tuesday 30th August 2016
quotequote all
chrispj said:
skyrover said:
Agreed it is wide by UK standards, but fairly par for the course in it's class.
IMO the entire class is made up of overly fat heffalumps...
76 inches wide will become the new norm soon enough.

Most new car's are in the 70-74 inch width mark nowadays thanks to tough side impact testing.

jamieduff1981

8,025 posts

140 months

Tuesday 30th August 2016
quotequote all
Maldini35 said:
jamieduff1981 said:
Maldini35 said:
From the article and the thread it seems the F-pace is another over- priced Jag which looks ok but falls short on build quality and interior.
Shame.
If such things matter (this is Pistonheads afterall), it also sounds like Jaguar is still the premium brand choice for people who want a nice interior but want rewarding driving dynamics more.

If you're not interested in the dynamics then fine, but some people are. Jaguar have been building cars that are better to drive than the competition on a like-for-like model basis for years now. Their development effort is bias towards steering and suspension set up. The Germans are bias towards soft touch plastics and infotainment screens.

I personally think it's mental to spend the same amount of money on a similar product that drives worse on the basis that it has more buttons inside but hey, that's my personal buying criteria talking.
I should say I have not driven or even sat in an F-Pace, I was simply summarising what the original article and a lot of people on this thread seem to be saying. I personally think it looks pretty good but don't really see the point of these type of cars. Plenty of people do though and there's nothing wrong with that.
As you say Jag should be praised for focusing on dynamics over interior finish and infotainment but a great handling SUV is like sporty stilts in my eyes - a bit pointless. It could be argued that if you really valued dynamics you probably wouldn't choose an SUV (or stilts).
And at the prices Jag is asking should we have to put up with slightly duff interiors and outdated infotainment in order to get a nice handling car? It's just a shame we can't have it all.
I should also state for the record that I'm not a fan of the Q5 or Macan either so no bias.
I don't disagree with you but we're back to the old PH mantra of mutual exclusivity again. IF it's accepted that the Smith family are going to buy an SUV, and Mr Smith is infact a keen driver, THEN it may be supposed that they'll look for the best driving car in that class.

It's no different to a relatively young father (i.e. me) choosing a Sunday car by trying to identify the fastest, loudest, sexiest and most visceral car I happen to be able to fit my daughters in to, and ending up with a 2+2 seater Cerbera. One could somewhat dimly argue that if I really cared about driving I would look for a 2 seater as there are many more good cars that fill the rest of the brief well. Unfortunately they all fall down as being of limited use to my particular application.

Too many Pistonheaders have cross-wired brains which consider that fun and family cannot go together. If it has to tick some practical boxes, it can't be fun or if you want any fun at all, you can't have practically etc etc. If you think about it, that blows the entire raison d'être of the ubiquitous BMW M3 out of the water. If you really cared about driving, you won't start with a mass-produced BMW sales rep car...

chrispj

264 posts

143 months

Tuesday 30th August 2016
quotequote all
They're not making roads or parking spaces any wider... Not a problem in America where they'll be hoping to sell lots of them, but in our crowded little island... I'd like to buy a comfy SUV because I'm fed up of the speed bumps round our way, but I'd also like to be able to park in the local car parks and still be able to open my door to get out or to squeeze past an oncoming car without having to reverse half a mile up in the narrow Dartmoor lanes. If you add 10 - 20cm on to the width of both cars then suddenly there's not much room for manoeuvre in either case.

Sheepshanks

32,759 posts

119 months

Tuesday 30th August 2016
quotequote all
chrispj said:
They're not making roads or parking spaces any wider... Not a problem in America where they'll be hoping to sell lots of them, but in our crowded little island... I'd like to buy a comfy SUV because I'm fed up of the speed bumps round our way, but I'd also like to be able to park in the local car parks and still be able to open my door to get out or to squeeze past an oncoming car without having to reverse half a mile up in the narrow Dartmoor lanes. If you add 10 - 20cm on to the width of both cars then suddenly there's not much room for manoeuvre in either case.
Around where I am (west Cheshire) I'd say the vast majority of premium SUVs, especially LandRover products, are driven by women and, sweeping generalisation, women don't concern themselves about door dings and dents while parked. If Jag are aiming for the same market in the UK then they'll be fine.

A friend of my wife's drives a Mercedes GL and she seemed baffled when I asked her about difficulty finding parking spaces.

jamieduff1981

8,025 posts

140 months

Tuesday 30th August 2016
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
chrispj said:
They're not making roads or parking spaces any wider... Not a problem in America where they'll be hoping to sell lots of them, but in our crowded little island... I'd like to buy a comfy SUV because I'm fed up of the speed bumps round our way, but I'd also like to be able to park in the local car parks and still be able to open my door to get out or to squeeze past an oncoming car without having to reverse half a mile up in the narrow Dartmoor lanes. If you add 10 - 20cm on to the width of both cars then suddenly there's not much room for manoeuvre in either case.
Around where I am (west Cheshire) I'd say the vast majority of premium SUVs, especially LandRover products, are driven by women and, sweeping generalisation, women don't concern themselves about door dings and dents while parked. If Jag are aiming for the same market in the UK then they'll be fine.

A friend of my wife's drives a Mercedes GL and she seemed baffled when I asked her about difficulty finding parking spaces.
I don't think that's women - that's just your average member of the public who aren't interested in other peoples' property.

My wife is very conscientious about door dings. Even my mother who's the furthest thing from a petrolhead would be mortified to damage someone else's car.

Sheepshanks

32,759 posts

119 months

Tuesday 30th August 2016
quotequote all
jamieduff1981 said:
I don't think that's women - that's just your average member of the public who aren't interested in other peoples' property.

My wife is very conscientious about door dings. Even my mother who's the furthest thing from a petrolhead would be mortified to damage someone else's car.
I was thinking the other way around - getting door dents etc doesn't seem to bother women. My wife's Tiguan got one first trip out in it - she wasn't happy, but said "what am supposed to do, not use it?" Apparently "go shopping less" wasn't the right answer.

MDMA .

8,895 posts

101 months

Tuesday 30th August 2016
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
Around where I am (west Cheshire) I'd say the vast majority of premium SUVs, especially LandRover products, are driven by women and, sweeping generalisation, women don't concern themselves about door dings and dents while parked. If Jag are aiming for the same market in the UK then they'll be fine.

A friend of my wife's drives a Mercedes GL and she seemed baffled when I asked her about difficulty finding parking spaces.
saw one yesterday for the first time. in white, women driving it. looked big. cool story smile

chrispj

264 posts

143 months

Tuesday 30th August 2016
quotequote all
In another sweeping generalisation, most I see are over the lines into the next space, or left with half the boot sticking out beyond the end of the space. There's very few where they've even attempted to fit between the white lines, which is kind of understandable when if you do then when you come back someone will be parked up against you and there's no space to open the door.

Turbodiesel1976

1,957 posts

170 months

Tuesday 30th August 2016
quotequote all
Great review. For this type of money I'd be inclined to push a little further and go with a Rangey Sport. Do like the look of the F-Pace though

Clivey

5,110 posts

204 months

Tuesday 30th August 2016
quotequote all
gizlaroc said:
I do not need specs! I choose to wear them on my days off!!!
And it is a great colour combo!!
laugh At least he's learned how to wear his underwear!