Supercar design! Anything which doesn't fit these 4 groups?

Supercar design! Anything which doesn't fit these 4 groups?

Author
Discussion

DRVR

Original Poster:

266 posts

143 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
Can somebody post a mid-engined 2-seatersupercar or sports car which doesn't follow one of these form factors:

1.Lamborghini like
2.Ferrari like
3.Porsche like
4.Le Mans like


Meaning, does somebody know of anything truly new?

If the above doesn't make sense, I will explain.

1.Lamborghini like: Vector, Cizeta, Apollo Arrow, Lykan Hypersport etc (way too many)
2.Ferrari like: Noble M600, Mazzanti Evantra, Hennessey Venom F5,
3.Porsche like: Isdera Commedatore, XJ220
4.Le Mans like: McLaren F1, Pagani, Koenigsegg, Ford GT40, GT etc,

It seems any supercar will follow one of the above formula. Maybe tastefully mix 2 of them. Anytime it doesn't entirely fit this it will be a style mess, like the Zender Vision.

Remember, this is about design only. I don't mean Lamborghini-like etc in terms of mechanics, branding etc. Only the design of the body.

By 2-seater I mean cars which don't have a backseat. But if it's a 3-seater like the McLaren F1 or even a single-seater it's fine. But no 2+2 cars please.

By the way, this post was originally part of my other thread. But people were getting confused so I broke it off into it's own thread as it's a different subject.

Edited by DRVR on Monday 29th August 15:45

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
yes, this one isn't confusing

Mastodon2

13,826 posts

166 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
I don't see anything of a Ferrari in a Hennessey Venom, nor do I see any Porsche in a Jaguar XJ220.

Turquoise

1,457 posts

98 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
Another thread?

Confusing and boring.

Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
I don't understand the question. I can only assume that I'm an idiot.

DRVR

Original Poster:

266 posts

143 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
Mastodon2 said:
I don't see anything of a Ferrari in a Hennessey Venom, nor do I see any Porsche in a Jaguar XJ220.
That is because you are only thinking about the 911 as a Porsche.


I will take another crack in explaining the categories:

1. Lamborghini-like: Well, looks like a Countach or like a modern Lambo. Cab-forward, edgy etc.

2.Ferrari-like: The classic sports car look. Reminds you of a 308, 328, 355, 348, 388 etc.

3.Porsche-like: Lots of rounds and bubble like lines.

4. Le-Mans like: Well says it all. Le-Mans racing cars have a very distinct set of lines.

Hope that helps.

This thread is not limited to supercars. Any mid-engined cars without a backseat is a go.;)

Be it a MR2 or a LaFerrari.


DRVR

Original Poster:

266 posts

143 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
Mastodon2 said:
I don't see anything of a Ferrari in a Hennessey Venom, nor do I see any Porsche in a Jaguar XJ220.
Sorry. It's not the normal Venon GT I meant the Venon F5:



JordanTurbo

937 posts

142 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
Instructions unclear. Dick stuck in keyboard.

DRVR

Original Poster:

266 posts

143 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
yes, this one isn't confusing
I tried explaining as well as I could. If it's above your "pay grade" just don't post then. wink

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
DRVR said:
Can somebody post a mid-engined 2-seater

DRVR

Original Poster:

266 posts

143 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
I guess you missed the sports cars specification. smile

Should I explain to you what makes a vehicle technically a sports-cars or will it be beyond your level of comprehension?


MTech535

613 posts

112 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
Where does Bugatti fit into your categorisations?

(trying to understand the question)

Equus

16,980 posts

102 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all


What do I win, and when are you back at school?

Iva Barchetta

44,044 posts

164 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
Which year did Pagani and Koenigsegg enter Le Mans ?....like....biggrin

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
There is an argument that certain front engined cars could be classed as mid-engined.

Turquoise

1,457 posts

98 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
desolate said:
There is an argument that certain front engined cars could be classed as mid-engined.
Don't confuse him, anymore than he already is. hehe

DRVR

Original Poster:

266 posts

143 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
desolate said:
There is an argument that certain front engined cars could be classed as mid-engined.
Yes, there is indeed such thing as front-midle-engined. At least technically. But they are normally discussed as only front-engined. I also think everybody knows mid-engined normally means rear-midle-engined, unless specified.

DRVR

Original Poster:

266 posts

143 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
MTech535 said:
Where does Bugatti fit into your categorisations?

(trying to understand the question)
You mean the Veyron, right? Because the EB110 is totally Lamborghini. smile

Yes, the Veyron is a curious case. It almost made me created a 5th category when I was considering it. Like I said I some will mix more categories. I guess I would still fit it in the Porsche-like category because of the bubble nature. It's like a fat Porsche with a little Lambo. But it's definitely up there with the more original designs for sure. smile

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
Mid-engined, two seater sports car



And another one


DRVR

Original Poster:

266 posts

143 months

Monday 29th August 2016
quotequote all
Equus said:


What do I win, and when are you back at school?
Is this a one of?

In any case I specified sports-cars. That technically is not what peopl think of as a sport-car. Hot-hatch more like it.