AUDI RS6 MUPPET
Discussion
Anyone know the driver of an AUDI RS6 ESTATE REG No. DC150XT or DC15OCT
Almost rammed my wife off the road this evening!! Muppet came flying up behind her on the A483 between Chester & Wrexham doing between
100-120 MPH literally rammed her to the inside lane. She gestured her disgust at his maniac driving. As she pulled across he moved in front of her to the inside lane the idiot pulled in front and slammed on causing her to swerve back out to avoid a collision!!!
There are L plates on the car and if my daughter, who is learning to drive was driving, it could of been very very nasty.
Seriously what is wrong with people.
My wife is shaking and crying due to being scared.
I'm currently furious and would love to meet this idiot right now.
Almost rammed my wife off the road this evening!! Muppet came flying up behind her on the A483 between Chester & Wrexham doing between
100-120 MPH literally rammed her to the inside lane. She gestured her disgust at his maniac driving. As she pulled across he moved in front of her to the inside lane the idiot pulled in front and slammed on causing her to swerve back out to avoid a collision!!!
There are L plates on the car and if my daughter, who is learning to drive was driving, it could of been very very nasty.
Seriously what is wrong with people.
My wife is shaking and crying due to being scared.
I'm currently furious and would love to meet this idiot right now.
eltax91 said:
Sorry to hear this OP. What's the damage from this 'literal ramming'? Have the reported this to the police? I mean your wife's Gatso eye saw him doing 120mph and he's effectively carried out a hit and run.
Yes, all joking or sarcasm aside, how bad's the damage to your wife's car? 120mph is a lot of speed to be carrying in a car of that weight in a collision on a public road.If the reg doesn't come up, is it possible it was stolen and on fake plates?
beerok said:
Almost rammed my wife off the road this evening!! Muppet came flying up behind her on the A483 between Chester & Wrexham doing between
100-120 MPH literally rammed her to the inside lane. She gestured her disgust at his maniac driving. As she pulled across he moved in front of her to the inside lane the idiot pulled in front and slammed on causing her to swerve back out to avoid a collision!!!
Not trying to be funny, and I get you're furious (I would be too if my wife was so upset) but the story, as told, suggests your wife was in lane 2 with an empty lane 1 beside her?100-120 MPH literally rammed her to the inside lane. She gestured her disgust at his maniac driving. As she pulled across he moved in front of her to the inside lane the idiot pulled in front and slammed on causing her to swerve back out to avoid a collision!!!
It reads a bit like this bloke came piling up behind her (what speed was she doing in lane 2 BTW?), bullied her out of the way (not excusing that at all) to lane 1 and then moved past in lane 2. She then 'gestures' as he's alongside her, so he brake checks her. Admittedly this is the actions of a t
t, but TBH, it sounds a bit more two-sided than the initial OP makes out, unless she was overtaking someone in lane 1, in which case i'll wind my neck in!(I'll repeat, it doesn't excuse brake-checking regardless).
Mike_Mac said:
beerok said:
Almost rammed my wife off the road this evening!! Muppet came flying up behind her on the A483 between Chester & Wrexham doing between
100-120 MPH literally rammed her to the inside lane. She gestured her disgust at his maniac driving. As she pulled across he moved in front of her to the inside lane the idiot pulled in front and slammed on causing her to swerve back out to avoid a collision!!!
Not trying to be funny, and I get you're furious (I would be too if my wife was so upset) but the story, as told, suggests your wife was in lane 2 with an empty lane 1 beside her?100-120 MPH literally rammed her to the inside lane. She gestured her disgust at his maniac driving. As she pulled across he moved in front of her to the inside lane the idiot pulled in front and slammed on causing her to swerve back out to avoid a collision!!!
It reads a bit like this bloke came piling up behind her (what speed was she doing in lane 2 BTW?), bullied her out of the way (not excusing that at all) to lane 1 and then moved past in lane 2. She then 'gestures' as he's alongside her, so he brake checks her. Admittedly this is the actions of a t
t, but TBH, it sounds a bit more two-sided than the initial OP makes out, unless she was overtaking someone in lane 1, in which case i'll wind my neck in!(I'll repeat, it doesn't excuse brake-checking regardless).
Liquid Tuna said:
eltax91 said:
Sorry to hear this OP. What's the damage from this 'literal ramming'? Have the reported this to the police? I mean your wife's Gatso eye saw him doing 120mph and he's effectively carried out a hit and run.
Yes, all joking or sarcasm aside, how bad's the damage to your wife's car? 120mph is a lot of speed to be carrying in a car of that weight in a collision on a public road.If the reg doesn't come up, is it possible it was stolen and on fake plates?
SSBB said:
Liquid Tuna said:
eltax91 said:
Sorry to hear this OP. What's the damage from this 'literal ramming'? Have the reported this to the police? I mean your wife's Gatso eye saw him doing 120mph and he's effectively carried out a hit and run.
Yes, all joking or sarcasm aside, how bad's the damage to your wife's car? 120mph is a lot of speed to be carrying in a car of that weight in a collision on a public road.If the reg doesn't come up, is it possible it was stolen and on fake plates?
Mike_Mac said:
Not trying to be funny, and I get you're furious (I would be too if my wife was so upset) but the story, as told, suggests your wife was in lane 2 with an empty lane 1 beside her?
It reads a bit like this bloke came piling up behind her (what speed was she doing in lane 2 BTW?), bullied her out of the way (not excusing that at all) to lane 1 and then moved past in lane 2. She then 'gestures' as he's alongside her, so he brake checks her. Admittedly this is the actions of a tt, but TBH, it sounds a bit more two-sided than the initial OP makes out, unless she was overtaking someone in lane 1, in which case i'll wind my neck in!
(I'll repeat, it doesn't excuse brake-checking regardless).
Good post - as you suggest there's maybe another side to the story.It reads a bit like this bloke came piling up behind her (what speed was she doing in lane 2 BTW?), bullied her out of the way (not excusing that at all) to lane 1 and then moved past in lane 2. She then 'gestures' as he's alongside her, so he brake checks her. Admittedly this is the actions of a t
t, but TBH, it sounds a bit more two-sided than the initial OP makes out, unless she was overtaking someone in lane 1, in which case i'll wind my neck in!(I'll repeat, it doesn't excuse brake-checking regardless).
OP - I sympathise that your wife had an unpleasant experience, however the credibility of your account is undermined by the claim that she could accurately estimate his speed at 100-120mph (in her rear view mirror?) and that he literally rammed her out of the lane.
Hyperbole?
So there was room for your wife in the inside lane and also room for the rs6 to pull infront of her in the inside lane too?
Sounds like very aggressive driving from him, it could have been stolen or something and not excusing it at all but she could have avoided it had she been in the inside lane.
Hope she osnt too upset by it though
Sounds like very aggressive driving from him, it could have been stolen or something and not excusing it at all but she could have avoided it had she been in the inside lane.
Hope she osnt too upset by it though
Ok guys.
Thanks first of all for your replies.
Correct she was not literally rammed more of forced into lane 1. There was no contact but would' have been had she hadn't reacted.
Why was she in lane 2 ? My wife was overtaking a car in lane one whilst driving at 70 mph. A completely legal manoeuvre.
The gesture was sounding her horn and flashing her lights when he passed. Are you telling me you wouldn't do the same??
Colour of the car is a champagne/mushroom colour.
Was it 100/120 mph? She was doing 70mph and the car approached from behind like she was stood still.
I've tried to answer as best as I can
Thanks first of all for your replies.
Correct she was not literally rammed more of forced into lane 1. There was no contact but would' have been had she hadn't reacted.
Why was she in lane 2 ? My wife was overtaking a car in lane one whilst driving at 70 mph. A completely legal manoeuvre.
The gesture was sounding her horn and flashing her lights when he passed. Are you telling me you wouldn't do the same??
Colour of the car is a champagne/mushroom colour.
Was it 100/120 mph? She was doing 70mph and the car approached from behind like she was stood still.
I've tried to answer as best as I can
beerok said:
Ok guys.
The gesture was sounding her horn and flashing her lights when he passed. Are you telling me you wouldn't do the same??
No I wouldn't, the tool in the RS6 is now ahead of me and I would just watch him disappear as there is no point in getting into a tussle at 70mph with a nutter. The gesture was sounding her horn and flashing her lights when he passed. Are you telling me you wouldn't do the same??
But not a nice thing to happen to your wife obviously.
A bit of intimidation is very different from 'literally rammed'. Now you've admitted that, how can we be sure the rest of the incident was as described?
To answer your question: I would never, ever react to such idiotic driving by sounding my horn or flashing my lights; it's simply provoking someone who is already behaving stupidly.
To answer your question: I would never, ever react to such idiotic driving by sounding my horn or flashing my lights; it's simply provoking someone who is already behaving stupidly.
beerok said:
Correct she was not literally rammed more of forced into lane 1. There was no contact but would' have been had she hadn't reacted.
Why was she in lane 2 ? My wife was overtaking a car in lane one whilst driving at 70 mph. A completely legal manoeuvre.
She must have been past the car in lane 1 if she was able to react and move over. Not excusing the arse in the Audi at all, but it sounds like she didn't move back in to lane 1 quickly enough for him.Why was she in lane 2 ? My wife was overtaking a car in lane one whilst driving at 70 mph. A completely legal manoeuvre.
Thing is, she must have seen him coming in her rear view mirror for a certain amount of time if she was able to estimate his speed at all.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff