RE: Alfa Giulia sets 7:32 Nurburgring lap
Discussion
Jimbo. said:
Reliable or not, should that happen with your GT3 (first world problems and all that), then Porsche (usually) won't look at you like you've just shat on the table at Christmas dinner, when you go to the dealers.
Alfa/Maserati will do just that AND take a st on the table at your Christmas dinner just because you asked...
funny you should say that, since Porsche introduced a new clause from 2015 GT3 saying tracking your car will void the warranty, including engine failures. so there.Alfa/Maserati will do just that AND take a st on the table at your Christmas dinner just because you asked...
Mintbird said:
Jimbo. said:
Reliable or not, should that happen with your GT3 (first world problems and all that), then Porsche (usually) won't look at you like you've just shat on the table at Christmas dinner, when you go to the dealers.
Alfa/Maserati will do just that AND take a st on the table at your Christmas dinner just because you asked...
funny you should say that, since Porsche introduced a new clause from 2015 GT3 saying tracking your car will void the warranty, including engine failures. so there.Alfa/Maserati will do just that AND take a st on the table at your Christmas dinner just because you asked...
mikearwas said:
Mintbird said:
funny you should say that, since Porsche introduced a new clause from 2015 GT3 saying tracking your car will void the warranty, including engine failures. so there.
That is disgraceful. Wasn't aware they'd done that. The way it rips up through the revs reminds me of my 700hp E63, if that's only 500hp I'll be surprised.
The euro market get the option of RWD whereas we only get the AWD version, that looked like the rear drive only version due to him appearing to be in complete control for only half the lap. Certainly after foxhole he wasn't in any form of control of it for a while lol.
The euro market get the option of RWD whereas we only get the AWD version, that looked like the rear drive only version due to him appearing to be in complete control for only half the lap. Certainly after foxhole he wasn't in any form of control of it for a while lol.
Jam12321 said:
DukeDickson said:
No and yes.
There's gut feel and there's also informed gut feel, possible knowledge and maybe actual knowledge. It may not be 100% accurate, but recall a quote along the lines of in F1, if the right person saw the right photo, they could generally get close to reality about a rivals engine in terms of power, torque, reliability and so on.
The other element is simple common sense. I just happened to watch an Evo drag race video earlier where an RS3 with similar lots of things beat an AMG45 with lots of similar things & by a sufficient margin, with apparently a few horses less. Is it really running 10hp less - not likely!
Somewhat conservative hp claims seem to be the new black, white, whatever. Can the current M3 do 8 something times to 100 with 'only' 10 horses more than its predecessor? Going lower and further back - Focus RS Mk2 vs Mountune ST. Somebody was doing well and somebody wasn't.
Telling porkies about horsepower (or it will still put out stated hp at 20,000ft, running on piss & at 50c) seems to be the new norm with many. Makes a change from the old Italian view of horses, I guess .
I can believe the right engineer looking at a pic of an engine of a competitor might be able to make certain informed guesses about it.There's gut feel and there's also informed gut feel, possible knowledge and maybe actual knowledge. It may not be 100% accurate, but recall a quote along the lines of in F1, if the right person saw the right photo, they could generally get close to reality about a rivals engine in terms of power, torque, reliability and so on.
The other element is simple common sense. I just happened to watch an Evo drag race video earlier where an RS3 with similar lots of things beat an AMG45 with lots of similar things & by a sufficient margin, with apparently a few horses less. Is it really running 10hp less - not likely!
Somewhat conservative hp claims seem to be the new black, white, whatever. Can the current M3 do 8 something times to 100 with 'only' 10 horses more than its predecessor? Going lower and further back - Focus RS Mk2 vs Mountune ST. Somebody was doing well and somebody wasn't.
Telling porkies about horsepower (or it will still put out stated hp at 20,000ft, running on piss & at 50c) seems to be the new norm with many. Makes a change from the old Italian view of horses, I guess .
In your example of the rs3,there is far more to a 0-100 sprint then just power. A pair of cars may run similar HP figures but what about tyres, gear ratios & software setup, peak torque figures and when that arrives in the rev range and how long for. What about weight distribution in relation to which road wheels receive how much power/torque. What about the stretch of road they are on? What about the drivers reactions etc..?
If the components, software and test situation for both cars were identical then you can safely assume that one is making more power than the other.
Simply put there are too many variables. I really don't think many people are in a position where they can guess specific HP figures from a video with little experience of the car itself.
Edited by Jam12321 on Saturday 10th September 12:50
As for the A45 vs RS4, if we were talking either of those vs a 1/2 BM equivalent with the traction thing, or the Golf R with a fair few horses less, or the Focus RS (which is down on power, heavier than claimed or something), then I could understand. However, they are very similar, the Merc has a claimed 10 additional ponies & possibly weighs 50kg less. Yet it loses by a decent margin.
A bit like the Nissan GTR vs Porsche thing, someone isn't being entirely truthful.
thegreenhell said:
kambites said:
SimonTheSailor said:
So what is it some V6 twin turbo thing ?
Yes, a new unit developed for this car. Pdelamare said:
The euro market get the option of RWD whereas we only get the AWD version, that looked like the rear drive only version due to him appearing to be in complete control for only half the lap. Certainly after foxhole he wasn't in any form of control of it for a while lol.
It's the other way around, we only get the option for an automatic RWD car, out in Europe they get the option for manual and 4WDSam
smm3008 said:
peter450 said:
They should have saved on the development budget and just stuck in a detuned Ferrari v8
Rumour has it that they couldn't get the Ferrari V8 to fit, so they cut two cylinders off to make the 2.9L V6 that they have nowDukeDickson said:
The other element is simple common sense. I just happened to watch an Evo drag race video earlier where an RS3 with similar lots of things beat an AMG45 with lots of similar things & by a sufficient margin, with apparently a few horses less. Is it really running 10hp less - not likely!
O/T but the RS3's seem to dyno at 390-400hp so yes they run more power as standard than Audi let on.TX.
StescoG66 said:
smm3008 said:
peter450 said:
They should have saved on the development budget and just stuck in a detuned Ferrari v8
Rumour has it that they couldn't get the Ferrari V8 to fit, so they cut two cylinders off to make the 2.9L V6 that they have nowSam
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff