What's the best-looking hatchback ever?

What's the best-looking hatchback ever?

Author
Discussion

Sycamore

1,772 posts

118 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
I wear glasses & I'm colour blind, and beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but fk me some of these suggestions are awful. A 1 series?!

Evilex

512 posts

104 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
Since I can have neither the Puma nor Racing Puma, can I have a Peugeot 205 T16 evo II?
It's sort of a lift-back...

If not, can I just have a 205 T16? Or maybe just a GTI, then.
Always thought the 205 was a well-resolved design.

DoubleD

22,154 posts

108 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
The Surveyor said:
Let me chuck this little hatchback into the mix....



Not just the best looking hatchback but one of the all-time best looking cars IMHO.

If we're looking at pure angular shopping-cart hatchbacks, the Lancia Delta posted earlier takes some beating.
What, a new mini, best looking car of all time?!

InductionRoar

2,014 posts

132 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
PHMatt said:
T1berious said:
As there have been some "interesting" interpretation of a hatchback, I thought I'd chuck in my own.


It's a Z4 Coupe.
Coupe.

It's in the name.
It does have a hatch back though despite not being a hatchback. Even the PH approved Wikipedia says

wiki said:
2006

More powerful engines, freshened styling, and midyear introduction of a hatchback coupe mark 2006 for BMW's two-seaters.
so it must be right.

Smart Roadsters aren't roadsters either but the coupe also has a hatch back.



Kieran1985

25 posts

145 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all

This is best looking hatch in standard spec or.....

This just wins. Proportions or just right. Similar to the 205 but better

robemcdonald

8,784 posts

196 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
twiggypom said:
rossybee said:
Probably because it's not a hatchback.
More of a hatchback than a Morgan or Z4 coupe!

LordTwaddle

477 posts

125 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
Before you say anything, this technically speaking IS a hatchback and it's one of the first ones ever made. So for that reason I say the MGB/C GT range looks better than any other hatchback.

g7jhp

6,964 posts

238 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
Still the benchmark, timeless and affordable.



Trabi601

4,865 posts

95 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
Sycamore said:
I wear glasses & I'm colour blind, and beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but fk me some of these suggestions are awful. A 1 series?!
At least it's actually what most people would recognise as a 'hatch back', not a coupe, a GT, a mid-engined homologation special or even a 'supercar' in the case of some posted.

85Carrera

3,503 posts

237 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
Mafioso said:
Some frankly bizarre choices here (new Clio!? rofl )

Always thought these look good (RWD too!):
Good shout, had forgotten about these.



DeltaEvo2

869 posts

192 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
Delta and new Giulietta.

85Carrera

3,503 posts

237 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
neil-935ql said:
Rose tinted glasses as I own one , love the shape more now than when I bought it
Or maybe you need new glasses? laugh

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 26th September 2016
quotequote all
g7jhp said:
Still the benchmark, timeless and affordable.

Brilliant car but just sold for record 30k....
I sold mine to some bloke who scrapped it 2 years later cry

dobly

1,182 posts

159 months

Tuesday 27th September 2016
quotequote all
Jimmy Recard said:
No way. Are you serious?!
Hatch or Coupe? Either way the CRX was a great car! Certainly not a family hatchback, as rear "seat" occupants weren't allowed to have legs or feet.....

MikeT66

2,680 posts

124 months

Tuesday 27th September 2016
quotequote all
R E S T E C P said:
woohoobiggrin

Although in truth, I think some cars are really coupés and not hatchbacks in the modern sense, (e.g. E-Type, which really was a coupé version of the roadster/convertible), and some coupés are nothing more than hatchbacks (Scirocco), so I'm not too sure if the Puma fits in - I don't think I'd class it as a hatchback, myself.... even though, er, it has one...

MarshPhantom

9,658 posts

137 months

Tuesday 27th September 2016
quotequote all

24 Lemons

591 posts

96 months

Tuesday 27th September 2016
quotequote all

ambuletz

10,734 posts

181 months

Tuesday 27th September 2016
quotequote all
MikeT66 said:
R E S T E C P said:
woohoobiggrin

Although in truth, I think some cars are really coupés and not hatchbacks in the modern sense, (e.g. E-Type, which really was a coupé version of the roadster/convertible), and some coupés are nothing more than hatchbacks (Scirocco), so I'm not too sure if the Puma fits in - I don't think I'd class it as a hatchback, myself.... even though, er, it has one...
its pretty much a fiesta in internal/external dimensions though.

chrisga

2,089 posts

187 months

Tuesday 27th September 2016
quotequote all
Evilex said:
Since I can have neither the Puma nor Racing Puma, can I have a Peugeot 205 T16 evo II?
It's sort of a lift-back...

If not, can I just have a 205 T16? Or maybe just a GTI, then.
Always thought the 205 was a well-resolved design.
Yep of course you can. How about a fire breathing one?


Tuvra

7,921 posts

225 months

Tuesday 27th September 2016
quotequote all
The Surveyor said:
Let me chuck this little hatchback into the mix....



Not just the best looking hatchback but one of the all-time best looking cars IMHO.
I'm shaking my head in disbelief punch