Cars That Are Ageing Badly
Discussion
sleepera6 said:
Guess they look dated because the design goes back 12 years (13 years for the Mk2 3 door albeit with split grill).I had a problem looking to buy a £20k late S3 as it had the same basic interior layout as the 2004 1.6 SE I was smoking around in, especially as the 2004 had so many options thrown at it.
Trabi601 said:
No, because the OEM clusters were designed to a specific BMW styling trait. Look at all BMWs from the mid 2000s onwards and you'll see it in most of them.
Yes, I'm perfectly aware of that. What I am saying was that their design language was wrong, and it took some entreprenurial aftermarketeers to put it right.Britcar driver said:
1st Gen Boxster. Looked cool when it first came put, but cheap interior and fried egg headlamps age it dramatically.
It's okay though, prices reflect this and they make for a great cheap track car!
Maybe for some its still in the cheap old Porsche category but for me, its come out of the other side, a tidy, original 986 is a fine thing for not a lot of money, keep the gingercators, standard wheels and enjoy a fantastic drive as it mellows into a classic, I dont think they are going to be going massively up in value but nice ones, manuals, in decent colour combos are firming up, and you get a six cylinder engine, judging by all the negative posts about the new Turbo four, these should be 20 grand by now !
I still remember Porsche challenge on the original PlayStation, thats how old they are.
JTSmith said:
OneTun said:
I always thought the Signium was pretty cool! If i remember it was a 'hatchbackk estate' before Audi came out with the A3 AvantAs a concept it was ahead of it's time, reclining rear seats, over head storage, fridge in the rear centre armrest, so you could have full-on luxury or with seats folded, a pretty handy carry-all.
As a design, it hasn't aged badly, nor could be released today as modern...all it is, is ageing, and if anything not ageing that badly. Rear end was a mess though to look at square on, and the front was quite bland. Good bit of design for it's time though IMO.
J4CKO said:
Britcar driver said:
1st Gen Boxster. Looked cool when it first came put, but cheap interior and fried egg headlamps age it dramatically.
It's okay though, prices reflect this and they make for a great cheap track car!
Maybe for some its still in the cheap old Porsche category but for me, its come out of the other side, a tidy, original 986 is a fine thing for not a lot of money, keep the gingercators, standard wheels and enjoy a fantastic drive as it mellows into a classic, I dont think they are going to be going massively up in value but nice ones, manuals, in decent colour combos are firming up, and you get a six cylinder engine, judging by all the negative posts about the new Turbo four, these should be 20 grand by now !
I still remember Porsche challenge on the original PlayStation, thats how old they are.
McAndy said:
bazza white said:
I'm the polar opposite on this one. I think that it has aged very gracefully and the 650S is an overwrought mess that won't age as well.J4CKO said:
It is 20 years old, it isnt that much newer than a late 944 !
Maybe for some its still in the cheap old Porsche category but for me, its come out of the other side, a tidy, original 986 is a fine thing for not a lot of money, keep the gingercators, standard wheels and enjoy a fantastic drive as it mellows into a classic, I dont think they are going to be going massively up in value but nice ones, manuals, in decent colour combos are firming up, and you get a six cylinder engine, judging by all the negative posts about the new Turbo four, these should be 20 grand by now !
I still remember Porsche challenge on the original PlayStation, thats how old they are.
Agree with this also. I do prefer the looks of the S on better wheels though. A great properly analogue sports car which is still relatively refined and useable and looks great in the right colour.Maybe for some its still in the cheap old Porsche category but for me, its come out of the other side, a tidy, original 986 is a fine thing for not a lot of money, keep the gingercators, standard wheels and enjoy a fantastic drive as it mellows into a classic, I dont think they are going to be going massively up in value but nice ones, manuals, in decent colour combos are firming up, and you get a six cylinder engine, judging by all the negative posts about the new Turbo four, these should be 20 grand by now !
I still remember Porsche challenge on the original PlayStation, thats how old they are.
Edited by SWoll on Friday 23 September 12:19
SWoll said:
McAndy said:
I agree. I think they were pushed into changes as it didn't look 'modern' enough, but the original 12C will still look great in 20 years just like the F1 does now.Of a similar sort of shape that doesn't fair so well...Noble 600...
Quickmoose said:
SWoll said:
McAndy said:
I agree. I think they were pushed into changes as it didn't look 'modern' enough, but the original 12C will still look great in 20 years just like the F1 does now.Of a similar sort of shape that doesn't fair so well...Noble 600...
Agree on the Noble, but then again much of the underlying tech is also pretty old school so suits it in many ways.
carlove said:
Today I saw one of these on a 66 plate, the oldest looking new car I can think of, possibly the oldest new car you can buy anyway, must have been around nearly 20 years.
The Jimny has been around forever but is still reasonably well regarded if you want a cheapish, lightish, not very powerful but relatively capable offroader. Technically it was designed in the late 40s as the Land Rover, Suzuki just took the concept and made it so it always starts and doesn't rust as much.Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff