Zuckerberg: can my $3bn clear the world of diseases

Zuckerberg: can my $3bn clear the world of diseases

Author
Discussion

turbobloke

Original Poster:

103,911 posts

260 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all

FN2TypeR

7,091 posts

93 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
Three billion dollars?

Peanuts!

FredClogs

14,041 posts

161 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
Why on earth would you want to do that? As if creating face book wasn't bad enough now he wants everyone to live forever?

Get it up ya.

steveT350C

6,728 posts

161 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
Microsoft aiming to crack cancer code using artificial intelligence.....

https://techcrunch.com/2016/09/20/microsoft-wants-...

Both stories released within 24 hours of each other

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

123 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
A few days ago we had this:

"Microsoft has vowed to “solve the problem of cancer” within a decade by using ground-breaking computer science to crack the code of diseased cells so they can be reprogrammed back to a healthy state."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/09/20/micr...


Will the tech companies really have more success at tackling such diseases? (Compared to say drug companies, and more conventional medical scientists).


Landlord

12,689 posts

257 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
Given a single pharma company's profits (GSK) for a single year equate to more than triple his pledge for the whole decade, I'd suggest that it's an optimistic aim.

Good on them for trying though. Can't do any harm.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
FredClogs said:
Why on earth would you want to do that? As if creating face book wasn't bad enough now he wants everyone to live forever?

Get it up ya.
Preserving future profits.....

BoRED S2upid

19,691 posts

240 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
BIANCO said:
Easy that one, NO.
At least let the man have a go it would be funny to watch.

Smollet

10,556 posts

190 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
Has he something new coming out online very soon?

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

233 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
if that post gets enough likes he'll cure cancer

5pen

1,888 posts

206 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
if that post gets enough likes he'll cure cancer
Only if you say "Amen" too.

Budflicker

3,799 posts

184 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
It's almost like overpopulation of the planet is not an issue, and what we really need is more people.


Oh hang on, that's not right is it?

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
5pen said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
if that post gets enough likes he'll cure cancer
Only if you say "Amen" too.
99% of people will ignore this post.

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

233 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
el stovey said:
5pen said:
Hugo a Gogo said:
if that post gets enough likes he'll cure cancer
Only if you say "Amen" too.
99% of people will ignore this post.
reply and comment 'yes' to see the magic

Adenauer

18,575 posts

236 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
[redacted]

JagLover

42,389 posts

235 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
Landlord said:
Given a single pharma company's profits (GSK) for a single year equate to more than triple his pledge for the whole decade, I'd suggest that it's an optimistic aim.

Good on them for trying though. Can't do any harm.
Drug companies research spending is heavily focused on where they achieve a return on their investment. Which is the rich world and more specifically the USA.

$3 billion is actually a significant sum of money if targeted at diseases that afflict developing companies.

Jonesy23

4,650 posts

136 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
The hubris of a bad engineer. He doesn't understand the problem so he thinks it will be quick and cheap to solve.

Getting lucky with a web site and having a wedge of cash doesn't make you a great thinker. Though Zuck is hardly unique in this.

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

198 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
this would have been a better place for his $3bn

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StarTram

steveT350C

6,728 posts

161 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
Both Gates and Zucker have the money to employ the best brains to try to beat cancer and other diseases by coming at them from a completely different angle.

Currently the economic impact of treating cancer is about 1.5% of global GDP

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 22nd September 2016
quotequote all
SystemParanoia said:
this would have been a better place for his $3bn

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StarTram
WTF



This deserves its own thread.