RE: Subaru BRZ MY17 facelift details

RE: Subaru BRZ MY17 facelift details

Author
Discussion

davyvee

295 posts

135 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
So... more POWER equal more fun?

hmmmm

RenesisEvo

3,608 posts

219 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
ian2144 said:
The Toyota was also better finished inside.
confused BRZ and GT86 are built in the same factory. By the same people. Presumably using largely the same bits.

WCZ

10,525 posts

194 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
davyvee said:
So... more POWER equal more fun?

hmmmm
yes, the brz has a slower 0-60 time than a 520d

Alex

9,975 posts

284 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
WCZ said:
yes, the brz has a slower 0-60 time than a 520d
So a 520d is more fun than a BRZ? I think you're on the wrong forum.

WCZ

10,525 posts

194 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
Alex said:
So a 520d is more fun than a BRZ? I think you're on the wrong forum.
no, I'm using that as a barometer of boring performance

Alex

9,975 posts

284 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
WCZ said:
no, I'm using that as a barometer of boring performance
I have a standard BRZ, and it is a lot more fun than my Golf R or my old Impreza P1 or TVR Griff 500. How can that be?

liner33

10,690 posts

202 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
Alex said:
I have a standard BRZ, and it is a lot more fun than my Golf R or my old Impreza P1 or TVR Griff 500. How can that be?
Over time you have become easier to please wink

Alex

9,975 posts

284 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
liner33 said:
Over time you have become easier to please wink
Quite the opposite!

em177

3,131 posts

164 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
Alex said:
WCZ said:
no, I'm using that as a barometer of boring performance
I have a standard BRZ, and it is a lot more fun than my Golf R or my old Impreza P1 or TVR Griff 500. How can that be?
My standard GT86 is the most fun and rounded road car I've owned.

liner33

10,690 posts

202 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
Alex said:
Quite the opposite!
The fact is

1) Lots of owners are happy with the performance of the stock 86/BRZ
2) More owners are unhappy with the performance of the stock 86/BRZ as demonstrated by the tuning and modifying scene and the fact you rarely see a stock one
3) Even more potential owners really like the looks of the 86/BRZ but would prefer a little more power and/or not to have to rev the nuts out of it all the time to make decent progress

None of these groups of people will sway the opinions of any of the other groups no matter how often they post or how often the discussion comes up





WCZ

10,525 posts

194 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
Alex said:
I have a standard BRZ, and it is a lot more fun than my Golf R or my old Impreza P1 or TVR Griff 500. How can that be?
fair enough, everyone is different

I drove one around Donnington and it felt tediously slow
also a friend bought one and sold it after a few weeks because it felt under powered to him

that's my only basis (that and I believe a new performance car should be able to out accelerate a 520d)

kambites

67,561 posts

221 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
WCZ said:
that's my only basis (that and I believe a new performance car should be able to out accelerate a 520d)
It's not a performance car; it's a sports car. There is cross-over but they aren't the same thing and a car can be either without being the other.

I can imagine it feeling a bit lacking on a big open track like Donnington, though. I suspect no more than 1% of them will ever see a track in the hands of their original owner.

Edited by kambites on Tuesday 6th December 13:44

Onehp

1,617 posts

283 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
Guvernator said:
It doesn't need 300bhp, at least not in this form. Sure release a turbocharged STi version for the power junkies but the standard car just needs a little lift.

230bhp, a nicer sound and a bit more urge in the upper rev range would transform this car.
Fully agree and exactly what I've done. Taken along plenty passengers that thought it would be some kind of mellow soft sports car, and they got out impressed and apologetic for how wrong their (internet fuelled) prejudices were.
This was always on drives along twisty back roads, pretending to be a supercar on the autobahn however would indeed not impress much, which was never the point of this car either...


KTF

9,805 posts

150 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
Its funny how people don't seem to level the same criticism of the performance against the MX5 yet its always brought up in a GT86/BRZ thread.

Alex

9,975 posts

284 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
ash73 said:
Blimey, would be interested to hear more about how the BRZ and P1 compare; always fancied a P1.
The P1 is binary, the BRZ is analogue. The P1 is black and white, the BRZ is shades of grey. The P1 is boosty, the BRZ is linear.

The most fun in driving comes from when the car is near the limit of adhesion and to do this in the P1 required interstellar speeds, which isn't as much fun as it sounds. It was a boring track car too.

Edited by Alex on Tuesday 6th December 14:55

-Neil-

147 posts

183 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
I think this update in the US has a different final drive ratio to give the car a bit more get up and go at the expense of a few more revs on the motorway.

patmahe

5,750 posts

204 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
Is it fair to say that this, along with the GT86 have been a sales failure? I certainly don't see many about. On paper its exactly what us enthusiasts asked for so why aren't we buying it? Yet the MX5 marches on, or do they just seem more plentiful because they've been around a lot longer.

I know it was never going to be a high volume car and maybe badge snobbery and a 'lack' of power (even though that was partially the point) have meant people went elsewhere. But are those the real reasons?


kambites

67,561 posts

221 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
patmahe said:
Is it fair to say that this, along with the GT86 have been a sales failure?
In the UK, yes. I think I read somewhere that we're the only market it's failed to hits its sales targets in.

big_rob_sydney

3,402 posts

194 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
British Beef said:
http://www.autoblog.com/2015/02/11/subaru-brz-362h...

Here is your BRZ, with 360 hp, V8 NA, 11000 rpm red line and manual gearbox!!!!

Although I suspect build cost would be somewhat north of a new 911 GT3 cost.
I dont mind bike engined cars, though the torque is a bit low.

Radical here in the UK do a v8 version of bike engines too, so a solution close to home with manufacturer support could be an option.

In saying all that, if one were to go the bike engine route, a turbo Busa engine is a common solution in the US, with strong aftermarket support. They've started supporting them here too, so again, its possible to get that installed. IIRC, something like 4-500bhp from these engines isn't impossible either.

Now imagine THAT in a BRZ.

KTF

9,805 posts

150 months

Tuesday 6th December 2016
quotequote all
kambites said:
In the UK, yes. I think I read somewhere that we're the only market it's failed to hits its sales targets in.
I believe from the other threads where this issue is raised, its down to the monthly PCP payments. For the same monthly cost as a GT86, you could get a Golf R or something like that.

Edit: As an example I found online.

Golf R:
Monthly Payments - 48 x £271.82
Customer Deposit - £6,800.00

From: https://www.inchcape-volkswagen.co.uk/offers/new-c...

Subaru BRZ:
48 monthly payments of £299.00
Customer Deposit £5,836.50

From: http://subaru.co.uk/offers/brz/low-monthly-payment...

Edited by KTF on Tuesday 6th December 15:51