RE: Lexus LC500: Driven

RE: Lexus LC500: Driven

Author
Discussion

mwyatt82

87 posts

123 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
Seems obvious why Lexus are now the go to N/A choice; it's their natural (given sales) bias towards the American market which means a V8 isn't hamstrung by CO2 based tax. The Germans have a more even sales spread and therefore have to respond to legislative pressure in a wider number of markets. Not sure why the press don't point that out more when they do a riff on how marevellous Lexus are for hanging on to N/A more closely.

Fittster

20,120 posts

213 months

Sunday 11th December 2016
quotequote all
sleepera6 said:
Fittster said:
Audemars said:
With Lexus you also get the best reliability and exclusivity. What is not to like?
Lack of estate versions of their saloons.
No point IMO, the SportCross was a massive failure when people asked for it, no one wants a Lexus estate apart from PH ers.
The sportscross had such a tiny load capacity it was barely an estate. If people will buy 5 series and E-Class estates I don't see a logical reason why a GS estate would be a flop.


Fresh Prince

527 posts

172 months

Sunday 11th December 2016
quotequote all
I like this, simply because it is different.

If this gets the LFA's V10 I will sell my house and buy one.

je777

341 posts

104 months

Sunday 11th December 2016
quotequote all
I couldn't possibly drive a car with fewer than 11 gears. What is this the 1950s?

AmitG

3,299 posts

160 months

Sunday 11th December 2016
quotequote all
Fittster said:
The sportscross had such a tiny load capacity it was barely an estate. If people will buy 5 series and E-Class estates I don't see a logical reason why a GS estate would be a flop.
I agree. I would definitely be interested in an estate version of the IS300h.

I know that the global market is moving towards SUVs and maybe that's a factor.

If I was Lexus I would look at taking the 4WD hybrid drivetrain from the RX and putting into an estate style body to compete with the Volvo XC70, Audi A6 Allroad and Subaru Outback/Levorg. I don't think there is any hybrid available in that sector right now. I reckon they could do really well with that.

chrispj

264 posts

143 months

Sunday 11th December 2016
quotequote all
Fittster said:
The sportscross had such a tiny load capacity it was barely an estate. If people will buy 5 series and E-Class estates I don't see a logical reason why a GS estate would be a flop.
+1

As I don't want a crossover the size of a bus but need a decent amount of luggage space, Lexus just don't make it on to my radar when it's time to replace my main car, which is a shame as I like the over-engineered style and the brand in general as an alternative to the ubiquitous Germans.

Wills2

22,839 posts

175 months

Sunday 11th December 2016
quotequote all
Audemars said:
The IS300 Fsport is the best looking saloon (far better than the M3 and the Alfa) (forget about the dull monstrosities from Merc and Audi)
IS300 Vs. M3? laugh

Back to the LC500, it looks stunning inside and out to these eyes, lovely thing, but trying to say it's a rival for a 488 does appear a little silly, much more an 650i competitor.



Edited by Wills2 on Sunday 11th December 11:11

RenesisEvo

3,608 posts

219 months

Sunday 11th December 2016
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
trying to say it's a rival for a 488 does appear a little silly, much more an 650i competitor.
If you read what was written:

Article said:
Lexus folk will tell you that they have aimed the LC's dynamic make-up somewhere between the Porsche 911 and Ferrari 488, which is nothing if not a glowing testament to their optimism. More broadly, they admit the target cars for the LC's full repertoire include BMW M6, Mercedes SL and Maserati GT models, which seems altogether more realistic, and no less ambitious.
To me it's clear Lexus aren't saying this a 488 competitor (they actually name the 6 series). My interpretation would be they benchmarked cars like the 488 and 911 for key handling traits, which is good news, as aiming so high means if they fall a little short, it will still be very good. The estimated price tag backs that up. It's quite possible to aim different aspects of a car at different areas/competitors; whether you achieve it and whether the end result is coherent is another thing.

pSyCoSiS

3,597 posts

205 months

Sunday 11th December 2016
quotequote all
£90k for that?! No thanks!

dinkel

26,951 posts

258 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
MonkeyMatt said:
I must admit I quite like this
Back to back with a Maserati: opinions?

Wills2

22,839 posts

175 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
RenesisEvo said:
Wills2 said:
trying to say it's a rival for a 488 does appear a little silly, much more an 650i competitor.
If you read what was written:

Article said:
Lexus folk will tell you that they have aimed the LC's dynamic make-up somewhere between the Porsche 911 and Ferrari 488, which is nothing if not a glowing testament to their optimism. More broadly, they admit the target cars for the LC's full repertoire include BMW M6, Mercedes SL and Maserati GT models, which seems altogether more realistic, and no less ambitious.
To me it's clear Lexus aren't saying this a 488 competitor (they actually name the 6 series). My interpretation would be they benchmarked cars like the 488 and 911 for key handling traits, which is good news, as aiming so high means if they fall a little short, it will still be very good. The estimated price tag backs that up. It's quite possible to aim different aspects of a car at different areas/competitors; whether you achieve it and whether the end result is coherent is another thing.
But's not going to rival the "dynamic make-up of the 488" is it? Hence my comment, and it's way behind an M6 in terms of performance, so to me it's a great looking car but a 650i GC rival, as they eventually get round to saying.

It's silly to me to start off talking about 911/488 rivalling dynamics to end up admitting it's a 6 series rival. Just start there in the first place.



louiebaby

10,651 posts

191 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
I like the look, but as with a number of cool looking cars:

shoutWhere the fk is the front numberplate supposed to go?

It'll look ste when one is fitted.

TerryThomas

Original Poster:

1,228 posts

91 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
On the front and back like in the pictures with the article.

louiebaby

10,651 posts

191 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
TerryThomas said:
On the front and back like in the pictures with the article.
Ah, quite. getmecoat

I seem to have been looking at Google Images to get a better look at it.

I looks much better without a front numberplate...

TerryThomas

Original Poster:

1,228 posts

91 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
Most of us do. wink

RenesisEvo

3,608 posts

219 months

Monday 12th December 2016
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
But's not going to rival the "dynamic make-up of the 488" is it?
Isn't it? Have you driven it? How do we know it doesn't 'feel' a bit like a 488, or 911? How can we be sure it doesn't have similar response rates, steering characteristics, on-limit balance, damping, etc etc. How do we know what specific characteristics they were interested in, and were not? We may never know, unless you can pin down the engineers responsible and a bunch of cars to demonstrate. No, it won't be the same as a 488 or 911, but remove sound, performance numbers and get into the finer detail and there may be something there. It is equally as optimistic as Lexus to claim comparison, as it is naive to believe they've not got anywhere near it, IMO.

Wills2 said:
Just start there in the first place.
As I said before, aim higher, and you might do better. A 6 series isn't exactly setting the bar very high.

Edited by RenesisEvo on Monday 12th December 14:47

Carl_Manchester

12,210 posts

262 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
louiebaby said:
I like the look, but as with a number of cool looking cars:

shoutWhere the fk is the front numberplate supposed to go?

It'll look ste when one is fitted.
I had my reservations but in this fresh video from Motor Authority the car looks really quite smart.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2eWI6kda2Y


grumpynuts

956 posts

160 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Sat in the yellow V8 one yesterday. The LC is a stunning car in the flesh, both inside and out,it makes all the German stuff look really boring. There's a new IS coming early in 2017, an LS later in the year, and in 2018 a 7 seat RX. With the world turning against diesels, Lexus, who have stuck with petrol/hybrid for years , often against severe criticism, look to be very much on the up. Good for them for sticking with their philosophies. If I could afford it, I'd trade my 996 for a LC all day long, never thought I'd ever say that.

pthelazyjourno

1,848 posts

169 months

Friday 16th December 2016
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
Had a Lexus for a couple of months now, nothing as nice as that just an IS but they do kind of grow on you in a subtle "no fuss" way.

That thing looks very nice smile






I bought an IS this month, it's the first non enthusiast's car I've owned (after the likes of the Elise, MR2, Cooper S etc) and I love it to bits. It just does the job in wonderful silent comfort. Is slow for a 2.5 but ragging it doesn't feel right anyway. Great turn in, tail happy if you push it, electric everything and heated seats, I really like it.

Everybody else seems to hate Lexus but IS is a decent and quirky alternative to ubiquitous 3 Series.

underphil

1,246 posts

210 months

Friday 16th December 2016
quotequote all
jason61c said:
underphil said:
bit lame that the peak power is at the same RPM as the rev limit !!
do you actually like engines?
yes, I was complaining that the rev limit is set too low!!

remind me what high revving masterpiece of an engine you drive every day???