RE: Alfa Romeo Brera JTDM: Spotted

RE: Alfa Romeo Brera JTDM: Spotted

Author
Discussion

jsc15

981 posts

209 months

Thursday 22nd December 2016
quotequote all
I had a red 2007 V6 4WD from 09 to 11......bought from Arnold Clark and turned out to be an ex-hire car (Hertz or Avis, can't recall which). Had the Pano roof and looked gorgeous from any angle but had to get the engine out for a warranty fix, the steering pump failed in a multistory, and the bonnet paintwork could peel by breathing on it (probably a crap tidy up by Arnold I think).

PX'd it for another one in red, this time a 59 plate 2.2 with most of the Prodrive bits (but not the official "S" model). 19" alloys this time and probably the best looking car I'll ever own. Had the weird pano roof that you couldn't see out of though. Kept for 3 years before I chopped it in for a new S3 and German predictability frown

Lousy photo of 2nd car here....




Edited by jsc15 on Thursday 22 December 21:43

myhandle

1,194 posts

175 months

Thursday 22nd December 2016
quotequote all
V8 FOU said:
No, just no.
It's an Alfa, FFS. Needs to be the V6.
Yes x1,000 - a friend of mine gave me a lift to the pub earlier in his diesel Range Rover (he has a V8 Classic mk1 RR too so is not a lost cause :-) and I was grateful for the lift, but this type of engine has no place in an enthusiast car. Sadly, I'm not sure the Brera is an enthusiast car, but rather an alternative choice. Like the 986 Boxster, what would otherwise have been considered a good looking car was doomed by an over-promising concept car. At least the Boxster had a flat 6 like the concept did (or pretended to as it wasn't a runner) whereas the poor Brera went from a Maserati V8 in the concept to at best, a GM V6 in the production car, or, at worst,this engine.

JRzwevegem

55 posts

155 months

Friday 23rd December 2016
quotequote all
I honestly don't get why everyone is calling this a heavy car.
the 2.4 JTD has a curb weight of 1470kg.
A bmw E92 325d coupé has a curb weight of 1590kg
A audi a5 2.7tdi has a curb weight of 1550kg.
A bmw 123d E82 has a curb weight of 1495kg

So the Alfa is even lighter than the main competition.
And still everyone is calling it the heavy one.

kambites

67,591 posts

222 months

Friday 23rd December 2016
quotequote all
JRzwevegem said:
So the Alfa is even lighter than the main competition.
And still everyone is calling it the heavy one.
It may well be lighter than those cars (although I wouldn't really call any of them competitors - I'd say the obvious competition are small coupes like the TT, Scirocco and Celica rather than larger saloon-based cars with four proper seats) but it feels heavier than any of them.

Kitchski

6,516 posts

232 months

Friday 23rd December 2016
quotequote all
ecs0set said:
Ahh, you must be the other person who owns a 2.4 159 Ti Q4 in the UK. Apparently there may be up to 4 of us! smile

159 probably a more sensible bet than the Brera in this config.



Edited by ecs0set on Thursday 22 December 12:57
See, I think that looks better than the Brera!

Quickmoose

4,495 posts

124 months

Friday 23rd December 2016
quotequote all
kambites said:
JRzwevegem said:
So the Alfa is even lighter than the main competition.
And still everyone is calling it the heavy one.
It may well be lighter than those cars (although I wouldn't really call any of them competitors - I'd say the obvious competition are small coupes like the TT, Scirocco and Celica rather than larger saloon-based cars with four proper seats) but it feels heavier than any of them.
Exactly this...plus I think a lot of the weight is sitting above the driven wheels so (Q4 models apart) that 'feeling' is multiplied thanks to understeer...

Pooh

3,692 posts

254 months

Friday 23rd December 2016
quotequote all
My 2.2S did not feel heavy and probably had the least understeer of any car I have ever owned. It all depends which Brera you are talking about, an early V6 4wd is a totally different car to drive compared to a later S with, Bilstien Shocks, Eibach springs, lower ride height , different geometry, hollow anti roll bars, aluminium uprights, thinner high strength steel panels, different seats etc etc. Just because the early V6 was rubbish does not mean that all Breras are rubbish. I did abot 75k miles in mine and it was superb.

MattyB_

2,014 posts

258 months

Friday 23rd December 2016
quotequote all
Kitchski said:
See, I think that looks better than the Brera!
They actually do! (IMO, of course).

I looked at lots of Brera's, and I went to Second City in Brum (now called Love Alfa, or something) as they had a rew in there - however I've gotta be honest, side-by-side I found the 159Ti to be a much more attractive car than the Brera S that was next to it. The Brera is more striking, but the proportions of the 159 are just 'right'.

As it is, I didn't buy a Brera; the 2.2 is too slow and too thirsty for what it is, and the V6 is £550/year to tax, not much quicker and even worse on MPG (more than my V8 AMG was!). Chain replacements are engine out jobs if it ever needs doing. I did look around for the rare 1.8 TBi Breras, but they were fetching silly money. As I don't do diesels, those were out too.

Shame they never did a 159 GTA, that could have been something special.

Pooh

3,692 posts

254 months

Friday 23rd December 2016
quotequote all
MattyB_ said:
Chain replacements are engine out jobs if it ever needs doing.
Not sure about the V6 but that is not true for the 2.2, I had the chain on mine changed at 96k miles and the engine was not removed.

Chris71

21,536 posts

243 months

Friday 23rd December 2016
quotequote all
Jacobyte said:
PH Article said:
After the abject disappointment of the Alfa Romeo 4C
Eh?

The only negative comments I've seen or heard about the 4C is from journalists, and even then they are the punctuations around generally positive reviews. Everyone else I know that has driven one, or owns one, absolutely loves them. And even more so with a few tweaks to the suspension to suit British roads.
Each to their own, but I thought it was the most disappointing car I'd ever driven. Overly boosty, industrial-sounding engine, very inconsistent steering weight... You'd have to be a massive Alfa fan to turn down an Exige V6 (or a nice sensible Cayman) for a 4C IMHO.

Pooh

3,692 posts

254 months

Friday 23rd December 2016
quotequote all
Chris71 said:
Each to their own, but I thought it was the most disappointing car I'd ever driven. Overly boosty, industrial-sounding engine, very inconsistent steering weight... You'd have to be a massive Alfa fan to turn down an Exige V6 (or a nice sensible Cayman) for a 4C IMHO.
I have driven both the 4C coupe and Spider and enjoyed them both, I would buy one.
This reviewer seems to like the Alfa.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irPZ5_WdCas

Leggy

1,019 posts

223 months

Friday 23rd December 2016
quotequote all
If ever a brand was resting on past glories it's got to be Alfa. Generally a massive disappointment. This is no exception.
We had a V6 156 it looked good, that's all you could say really. Style over substance.

Edited by Leggy on Friday 23 December 18:14

Jacobyte

4,726 posts

243 months

Friday 23rd December 2016
quotequote all
Chris71 said:
Each to their own, but I thought it was the most disappointing car I'd ever driven. Overly boosty, industrial-sounding engine, very inconsistent steering weight... You'd have to be a massive Alfa fan to turn down an Exige V6 (or a nice sensible Cayman) for a 4C IMHO.
There's always one. biggrin

LordTwaddle

477 posts

126 months

Friday 23rd December 2016
quotequote all
I adore these cars, wonderful styling and the 5cl engine is rather unique.... but personally my perfect spec is the Spider variant in dark blue, red calipers and the V6 engine. It's the most expensive but worth it I'd say.

Mr Tidy

22,408 posts

128 months

Saturday 24th December 2016
quotequote all
Not for me - I learnt the Italian avoidance lesson with 1970s Fiats. laugh

Wondrous 5 cylinder 2.4 litre Diesel with "up to" 210 bhp - bcensoreds!

I had a 57 plate 123d with 200 bhp and it didn't handle like a barge as it was a proper RWD car (unlike any Alfa for about 40 years)!

A Brera may be pretty, but it's a bit fur coat and no knickers! (Desperate springs to mind)!

Yipper

5,964 posts

91 months

Saturday 24th December 2016
quotequote all
Alfa must be the most overrated car brand in the world. Clarkson has a lot to answer for. They are never quite pretty, reliable or fast enough to truly excite. The Brera being a prime example.

Pooh

3,692 posts

254 months

Saturday 24th December 2016
quotequote all
GJR68 said:
JRzwevegem said:
I honestly don't get why everyone is calling this a heavy car.
the 2.4 JTD has a curb weight of 1470kg.
A bmw E92 325d coupé has a curb weight of 1590kg
A audi a5 2.7tdi has a curb weight of 1550kg.
A bmw 123d E82 has a curb weight of 1495kg

So the Alfa is even lighter than the main competition.
And still everyone is calling it the heavy one.
Heavy compared to their power output. My GTV is 120kg lighter with the same power as the Brera. Same with the 156 to 159. Both the Brera and 159 looked great but performance wise were miles behind the competition and their predecessors.......... which for a brand claiming a sporting biased pedigree was a big fail.
Alfa Romeo GTV 3.0 V6 specs
Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1433 kg (3159 lbs)
Power / weight154 ps (152 bhp) / t
Torque / weight188 Nm (139 lb-ft) / t

Assuming your car is a V6 it is almost exactly the same weight as a 2.2S. I have had both, I loved the GTV but the Brera was better in every respect apart from the engine and the GTV would not see which way the Brera S went down a twisty road, the handling and grip are in a whole different class because Prodrive did a brilliant job with the suspension on the 2.2S.

Pooh

3,692 posts

254 months

Saturday 24th December 2016
quotequote all
GJR68 said:
The Brera was a shocker in all but looks. Even with it's Prodrive upgrades it was nothing better than average. It's also common knowledge the JTS was possibly the worst engine Alfa ever built. Never made close to its claimed power and saddled with a whole host of issues.
What personal experience do you have of the Brera to have come to this conclusion?

V6Alfisti

3,305 posts

228 months

Saturday 24th December 2016
quotequote all
Pooh said:
What personal experience do you have of the Brera to have come to this conclusion?
Indeed Pooh, clearly someone that has not been paying attention in class.

The JTS you are referring to is a previous generation in the GT/156 that was in early versions making less power, was a little troublesome in the 2002/2003 flavours and did coke up a bit. However the 2.2 JTS in this was dependable if a little dull, but no worse than it's german competition.

The Brera/159 are typically very reliable cars that have a few foibles but nothing worse than it's german competition.

In terms of the Prodrive version, it got pretty great reviews from memory http://www.evo.co.uk/alfa-romeo/brera/14258/alfa-r...

LordTwaddle

477 posts

126 months

Saturday 24th December 2016
quotequote all


This is my perfect spec, Spider with the V6 engine in this color