New car painted wrong colour

New car painted wrong colour

Author
Discussion

jeff666

2,320 posts

191 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
rkwm1 said:
Deerfoot said:
Aston or the dealer?
Aston Martin. Apparently Dr Andy Palmer himself has instructed them to do so.
I bet they have read this thread.

Butter Face

30,279 posts

160 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
jeff666 said:
rkwm1 said:
Deerfoot said:
Aston or the dealer?
Aston Martin. Apparently Dr Andy Palmer himself has instructed them to do so.
I bet they have read this thread.
They must have!

If it's from the bigwig then I guess OP isn't getting the car! Must be something in what he's signed that allows them to pull the deal or they're setting themselves up for a kicking!

cayman-black

12,641 posts

216 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
God this is bad. As for the op selling ,i know he is as read it on PHs so that means they are on here reading all this .

Andy665

3,619 posts

228 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
This whole thing is an utter disgrace and Aston Martin and all people associated with it should hang their heads in shame - whilst probably never able to afford a new Aston, a used Vantage was not far from the realms of possibility but this has completely turned me off Aston Martin


Hitch

6,105 posts

194 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
Have to agree that their behaviour seems pretty poor. Their supply chain has dropped the ball and now they're taking it home with them!

So what if they've read this? Mr Andy@Aston can't really expect all online coverage to be the brown nosing he seems to get on twittergram.

Shame really. I thought better of them than this.

TSCfree

1,681 posts

231 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
Andy665 said:
This whole thing is an utter disgrace and Aston Martin and all people associated with it should hang their heads in shame - whilst probably never able to afford a new Aston, a used Vantage was not far from the realms of possibility but this has completely turned me off Aston Martin
Agreed. Whilst we don't know the finer details, it would appear from the outside very poor form and completely at odds with my preconception of the brand. Sorry AM you've had a chance to redeem yourself and come out of this with some respectability, but you've completely cocked this one up.

Deerfoot

4,901 posts

184 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
rkwm1 said:
Deerfoot said:
Aston or the dealer?
Aston Martin. Apparently Dr Andy Palmer himself has instructed them to do so.
That's pretty poor form on their part.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

205 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
TheGreatSoprendo said:
Power

Beauty

R Soul
rofl

Bravo sir!

g3org3y

20,627 posts

191 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
TheGreatSoprendo said:
Power

Beauty

R Soul
rofl

Bravo sir!
Have another.

rofl

PurpleAki

1,601 posts

87 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
I hope this bites them on arse. PR disaster. And I hope they lose the case. Badly!

TIGA84

5,206 posts

231 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
We haven't got the full facts here, but that seems very very odd for everything to be amicable (and after meeting the CEO in person and you telling him the problem to which he said he'd deal with it personally) then working towards a decent agreed resolution for the CEO to basically turn round to the OP and go, actually I've changed my mind - fk you.

There's some key information missing between those two last events.

KTF

9,803 posts

150 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
TIGA84 said:
We haven't got the full facts here, but that seems very very odd for everything to be amicable (and after meeting the CEO in person and you telling him the problem to which he said he'd deal with it personally) then working towards a decent agreed resolution for the CEO to basically turn round to the OP and go, actually I've changed my mind - fk you.

There's some key information missing between those two last events.
I agree. This seems very odd.

Durzel

12,256 posts

168 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
Yeah something not adding up with this. One minute the CEO himself is getting involved, then the next minute for no apparent reason he's getting involved again to stop the OP having any car at all?

PieSlayer

8,849 posts

187 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
Wow.

edo

16,699 posts

265 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
rkwm1 said:
Well it just gets better and better. Now they are refusing to sell the car!

Edited by rkwm1 on Friday 17th February 16:51
WTF?



gweaver

906 posts

158 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
Some anagrams for "Power, Beauty, Soul":

  • Beware Lousy Pout
  • We Plot Your Abuse
  • Pour Bawl Eyes out
  • Reap Woe Buy Lotus

rkwm1

Original Poster:

1,476 posts

102 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
TIGA84 said:
We haven't got the full facts here, but that seems very very odd for everything to be amicable (and after meeting the CEO in person and you telling him the problem to which he said he'd deal with it personally) then working towards a decent agreed resolution for the CEO to basically turn round to the OP and go, actually I've changed my mind - fk you.

There's some key information missing between those two last events.
I'd love to go into it in more detail but as its with the solicitor now, unfortunately i can't at the moment.

Full details will be available on bailii.org sometime in the future.


Edited by rkwm1 on Friday 17th February 21:49

AC123

1,116 posts

154 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
As an Aston owner this is pretty disappointing to read - although perhaps there are two sides to every story.

I don't think I'd have posted this on here though for risk of the outcome being altered.

Pan Pan Pan

9,876 posts

111 months

Friday 17th February 2017
quotequote all
Not that interest rates have been all that wonderful of late, but if your substantial deposit is returned, should it not be with `some' interest, and dare I mention the word? compensation for the inconvenience? caused?

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

126 months

Saturday 18th February 2017
quotequote all
TIGA84 said:
We haven't got the full facts here, but that seems very very odd for everything to be amicable (and after meeting the CEO in person and you telling him the problem to which he said he'd deal with it personally) then working towards a decent agreed resolution for the CEO to basically turn round to the OP and go, actually I've changed my mind - fk you.

There's some key information missing between those two last events.
Reading between the lines ever so slightly...

Somebody at AM offered some kind of sweetener that was outside of their job description.
When they tried to get that signed off, it got squashed internally.
The OP insisted on what they'd been promised.
Aston said "Not happening, so we'll just cancel the contract entirely, since we can't make you happy".