RE: Lotus Exige Race 380

RE: Lotus Exige Race 380

Author
Discussion

AshBurrows

2,552 posts

163 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
kambites said:
Only if you consider bhp/litre to be a "competition". I don't, personally and I certainly wouldn't want to see anything with a turbocharger in the Exige.

I can see the point in comparing power to weight ratios of engines, and power to size ratios for that matter; but power to capacity ratio seem about as relevant as the colour of the timing belt to me. If they could get a 10 litre engine of the same weight and size as this V6 producing the same torque curve and the same economy, why would it be a worse engine?

Edited by kambites on Friday 13th January 09:47
I agree with this. People have been giving me grief for replacing an S54 with an LS3 despite it weighing less, being smaller, further back and having almost double the power. It really is a nonsense.

GranCab

2,902 posts

147 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
kambites said:
GranCab said:
Engine characteristics aside, the lowly origins of the Toyota engine hamper its potential to make competitive bhp/litre outputs.
Only if you consider bhp/litre to be a "competition". I don't, personally and I certainly wouldn't want to see anything with a turbocharger in the Exige.

I can see the point in comparing power to weight ratios of engines, and power to size ratios for that matter; but power to capacity ratio seem about as relevant as the colour of the timing belt to me. If they could get a 10 litre engine of the same weight and size as this V6 producing the same torque curve and the same economy, why would it be a worse engine?

Edited by kambites on Friday 13th January 09:47
So you are hoping for an Exige with a 6.2 litre LS3 engine shoehorned in the back then ...

kambites

67,586 posts

222 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
GranCab said:
So you are hoping for an Exige with a 6.2 litre LS3 engine shoehorned in the back then ...
If it weighed no more than the 3.5 Toyota unit and had the centre of gravity in the same place, yes. Why wouldn't I be?

CTE

1,488 posts

241 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
Isn`t it called an Hennessey?

LotusOmega375D

7,638 posts

154 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
I'm confused. I thought that there is no Lotus Motorsport Department anymore?

If so who's designing/building/testing these? JMG himself?

ukaskew

10,642 posts

222 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
Couldn't they have built one before launching it? That render is worse than you'll find on a games console.

blueg33

35,970 posts

225 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
FFs Lotus slaters

Its a racing car for £120k designed to race in specific classes. You cant really compare it to anything other than cars eligible for the same class. I bet there are not many Ultimas that would be eligible for the same classes

Set up your race team as a VAT registered business and the car will be 20% cheaper

CedricN

820 posts

146 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
Awesome car, probably an amazing drive. Had a chat with a guy driving in a team with a GT4 spec exige, he was VERY impressed with the car, for them it was a bargain compared to other cars they chose from with regards to speed and running costs.

People here obviously havent noticed what race cars actually costs. Even a clio R3T will probably cost you right under 100k€, a cayman GT4 well north of that.

hondansx

4,570 posts

226 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
In fairness, the press release should have talked more about the Lotus Cup series, as this is what the car is for. The advantage of the Evora is that it is GT4 car and can be used in a far wider range of prominent events. However, you could still use the Exige in other amateur series like Britcar, GT Cup, CSCC etc. where they follow a simple class structure of engine size / power / weight.

With the clever ABS and traction control it is a great car for someone looking to get into racing; it's just not the cheapest route of club racing. The advantage is Lotus Cup gets big grids whereas many series struggle to get 15-20 cars together.

Luke H

71 posts

134 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
RobM77 said:
HeMightBeBanned said:
RobDickinson said:
snuffy said:
How do they manage to squeeze so little power out of a 3.5 litre V6 ? It's only 25 ponies more than the 3.5 V8 Esprit I used to own which was built 18 years ago.
Emissions I guess, that has been reducing power/capacity for a while...
Nonsense. Power outputs have been going up year after year, despite ever more stringent emissions regs. Witness 600bhp saloons and 300bhp hatches. 20 years ago, 400bhp was supercar territory, 600 bhp was for hypercars and your emissions were dirtier than a back-street we with a liking for crack and anal.
The Esprit's V8 was a custom built engine for a sports car, designed in house at Lotus for the Esprit. The Exige's V6 was designed by Toyota for a people carrier. I don't have any engine specs to back that up, but surely that must play a part? I don't believe Lotus change anything on the V6 other than the ECU, I'm guessing the flywheel in this case and adding the forced induction. If Lotus were to choose bore/stroke, pistons, crank, compression etc then we might be looking at an engine with more power?
All of the core engine components are bone stock from Toyota - the Komotec Kits and TVS charger show that its clearly capable of more but Toyota only warranty the engine to a particular power level.

If lotus produce a car beyond this then the cost of replacement falls upon them. As a company thats not exactly rolling in cash it would be foolish to put such an engine into their higher volume cars.

A 3-11 Race is over the HP limit and so Lotus would have to cover anything but its probably manageable on such a low volume car.







donteatpeople

831 posts

275 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
ukaskew said:
Couldn't they have built one before launching it? That render is worse than you'll find on a games console.
I would think they have built one but it will likely have been thrashed, pulled apart, rebuilt and thrashed again several times over and may not be looking too pretty at this point in its life. It's also not the sort of car they're likely to build for showroom stock.

I doubt that anyone seriously thinking of buying a race car would give two sts that the press release used a rendering. They'd generally fall into the going out and having fun demographic rather than the whinge about stuff on the Internet demographic. I can't see persons working in the Lotus marketing department loosing any sleep.

Edited by donteatpeople on Friday 13th January 17:41

jayemm89

4,043 posts

131 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
donteatpeople said:
Lotus marketing
Who?

snuffy

9,788 posts

285 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
RobM77 said:
The Esprit's V8 was a custom built engine for a sports car, designed in house at Lotus for the Esprit. The Exige's V6 was designed by Toyota for a people carrier.
Which begs the question as to why Lotus think they can ask £120k for a car with a people carrier engine then ?

snuffy

9,788 posts

285 months

Friday 13th January 2017
quotequote all
CTE said:
Who gives a monkey`s what the power per litre is, within reason...you saddo prejudiced fools ought to get in one of these cars...if you`ll fit, and try driving one...they are great cars and extremely exciting to drive, even if they do not have all the latest gimmicks and technology.
I'm not questioning as to what the car is like to drive, or even if it needs more power. What I'm questioning is how Lotus can get such a small amount of power of out an engine that size with a superchager bolted on to it.

Lotus used to be very good at taking small engines and getting a lot of power (i.e. 300bhp from a 2.2 4-cylinder) and yet 25 years later they can only manage to get 376bhp from a 3.5 V6.



blueg33

35,970 posts

225 months

Saturday 14th January 2017
quotequote all
snuffy said:
RobM77 said:
The Esprit's V8 was a custom built engine for a sports car, designed in house at Lotus for the Esprit. The Exige's V6 was designed by Toyota for a people carrier.
Which begs the question as to why Lotus think they can ask £120k for a car with a people carrier engine then ?
Why does it beg that question. .obviously they can, they sell other cars with the same engine.

TVR managed to sell plenty of cars with the engine from a van amongst other things,

Cold

15,249 posts

91 months

Saturday 14th January 2017
quotequote all
snuffy said:
RobM77 said:
The Esprit's V8 was a custom built engine for a sports car, designed in house at Lotus for the Esprit. The Exige's V6 was designed by Toyota for a people carrier.
Which begs the question as to why Lotus think they can ask £120k for a car with a people carrier engine then ?
The 918 wasn't designed for the Esprit. It eventually ended up in there after a front engined project was canned and subsequently enabled the Esprit to carry on for a few more years.

As for the cost of this car, it will be the potential customers who will decide whether or not the origins of its engine are a factor in writing out a cheque. Some might even consider its proven reliability and longevity to be bonus for racing.

Jesus

Original Poster:

14,701 posts

190 months

Saturday 14th January 2017
quotequote all
snuffy said:
I'm not questioning as to what the car is like to drive, or even if it needs more power. What I'm questioning is how Lotus can get such a small amount of power of out an engine that size with a superchager bolted on to it.

Lotus used to be very good at taking small engines and getting a lot of power (i.e. 300bhp from a 2.2 4-cylinder) and yet 25 years later they can only manage to get 376bhp from a 3.5 V6.

That engine is capable of 460 bhp - Komotec will do it for you.

blueg33

35,970 posts

225 months

Saturday 14th January 2017
quotequote all
I would rather have a reliable Toyota engine with good parts availability than an unreliable low volume bespoke engine with limited parts availability.

The engine is fine, its quite a nice free revving unit.

Lotus are correct to focus on their strengths of chassis, and weight

V8 FOU

2,977 posts

148 months

Saturday 14th January 2017
quotequote all
Err.... the 918 was twin turbo. Mine produced 385bhp with sports cats and decent air filters. And was very reliable.

This Exige is a great car. Most of the critics have never experienced true Lotus dna.

Anyway, how about my Excel, presently receiving a 1UZ-FE Toyoya V8. 1100kg and 300bhp. See Readers Cars!

Europa1

10,923 posts

189 months

Saturday 14th January 2017
quotequote all
donteatpeople said:
ukaskew said:
Couldn't they have built one before launching it? That render is worse than you'll find on a games console.
I would think they have built one but it will likely have been thrashed, pulled apart, rebuilt and thrashed again several times over and may not be looking too pretty at this point in its life. It's also not the sort of car they're likely to build for showroom stock.

I doubt that anyone seriously thinking of buying a race car would give two sts that the press release used a rendering. They'd generally fall into the going out and having fun demographic rather than the whinge about stuff on the Internet demographic. I can't see persons working in the Lotus marketing department loosing any sleep.

Edited by donteatpeople on Friday 13th January 17:41
They have built one - there's a photo in the January Top Gear magazine.