Cars you are too young to ever love/understand
Discussion
Puddenchucker said:
VW Beetle (The original air cooled vesion).
I struggle to understand the affection for these as anything other than rudimentary transport.
One of the worst cars I have ever driven. However I can understand the affection. Whilst quirky they were also reliable, dependable and, being affordable, often peoples' first step into motoring. I struggle to understand the affection for these as anything other than rudimentary transport.
For many people it's nostalgia too. Not so much the car/model itself but what it represented. My first car was rusting MG 1100. It represented freedom and independence. I lived in the countryside. There were no bus services. I could cycle places but being quite hilly that was not much fun. I was totally dependent on lifts from my Mum. Getting my first car changed my life as a 17 year old. I could get a well paid holiday job, 8 miles away, I had a social life and could take girls out. So my car was my best friend. It really did not matter one iota what make/model it was or whether it was fun to drive; it drove me to fun!
Somewhatfoolish said:
Nor do I think I'll ever understand the Ford Escort.
Hand your PH card in right now First 'quick' car (I had a Hillman Imp and it was only 6 months after passing my test) I ever drove was an Escort Mexico at Brands Hatch at the Motor Racing School in 1973 then later on one of the other guys doing the school there let me drive his Escort RS1600 round the perimeter road. They were light, responsive and the sporty ones could outperform many so called sports cars at the time.
You only have to look at their race and rally results to see what a good car they were.
I am old and don't really understand the fascination with a lot of "classics".
VW Camper Van is probably the top one for me. Underpowered, unreliable, cramped, dangerous. But people rave about them. If you really must live in a van (rather than booking a hotel) then there are vastly superior vehicles available.
VW Camper Van is probably the top one for me. Underpowered, unreliable, cramped, dangerous. But people rave about them. If you really must live in a van (rather than booking a hotel) then there are vastly superior vehicles available.
I am old but there've always been cars that didn't compute. I don't understand why anyone would thicken and engorge thinking about an mgb. Theyre crappy and agricultural.
And any old vw especially now they're so expensive. You want to spend tens of thousands to do 28 mph while making a sickening noise? Good luck anyway.
And any old vw especially now they're so expensive. You want to spend tens of thousands to do 28 mph while making a sickening noise? Good luck anyway.
GravelBen said:
I don't understand why people think the E-type is a pretty car, other than being a 'classic' it looks like a misproportioned bar of soap.
The low drag version improves the situation I guess, at least it doesn't have a giant bulbous canopy plonked on the back of it.
Same. I don't think it's ugly, but it's not as good looking as some people make it out to be IMO The low drag version improves the situation I guess, at least it doesn't have a giant bulbous canopy plonked on the back of it.
caelite said:
My only other one is a bit grey, because I understand it but I just don't agree, which is the resistance to forced induction within older car enthusiasts. Turbo tech (and to a lesser extent supercharger) has moved on leaps and bounds in the last decade, with twin scroll and variable geometry units you can make a turbo engine feel like a bigger N/A unit with minimal lag and progressive power delivery. With forced induction you can get the same power and power delivery from a much more efficient power plant. (i.e Merc 6.3 vs 4.0 turbo)
It comes down to how accurate you like your throttle response. Look at the sports bikes out there at the moment and all are high revving, highly responsive units with incredibly accurate throttle response. Only the H2 is FI and that uses a supercharger.Even the very best of the latest turbocharged engines still have lag and have a different exhaust noise due to the turbo corrupting it. That said, I've not tried any of the turbos which are pre-spooled by an electric motor, but until that is available on most turbocharged engines then my preference is undoubtedly NA.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff