The Greateast Mass Production Engines Ever Made?
Discussion
Total loss said:
AAGR said:
Will everyone who thinks there was any connection between the Ford 'Kent' engine and the Cosworth DFV F1 engine go back to school to learn something, or to reliable book and internet sources.
So what was the FVA which used a Kent block ? It was the proof of concept Ford asked Cosworth to build when Cosworth went to Ford with the DFV plan. Satisfied with the FVA, Ford gave the go ahead for the DFV and Cosworth developed/improved the FVA head into the DFV head. Is none of that true ?
Welshbeef said:
So not that much quicker really - but the M4 which came next is a 8.5ish second car so much faster (yet it's not liked that much being forced induction)
I think from an technical point of view though the V8 is a better engine than the I6 in just about every way. Lighter, more power, better sound, revs higher, more reliable (?) but from what I understand the E46 is a better platform so flatters the engine more than the barge-like E92.cerb4.5lee said:
It is by me though, it's usable shove and it's now genuinely a quick car so that will do for me, N/A engines are for a good reason a thing of the past.
I enjoyed thrashing the M4 at Palmer Bedford autodrome - pulled very hard out of the corners and a great turn in. Cannot compare to the V8aeropilot said:
Total loss said:
AAGR said:
Will everyone who thinks there was any connection between the Ford 'Kent' engine and the Cosworth DFV F1 engine go back to school to learn something, or to reliable book and internet sources.
So what was the FVA which used a Kent block ? It was the proof of concept Ford asked Cosworth to build when Cosworth went to Ford with the DFV plan. Satisfied with the FVA, Ford gave the go ahead for the DFV and Cosworth developed/improved the FVA head into the DFV head. Is none of that true ?
Rover V8. Slightly naff but awesome at the same time. The stalwart of British fun motoring.
LSx (I'm not an expert here) - The yank version of the Rover V8. Better in every measurable way than our one: sound.
The BMW 320d engine. Miles better than all the other 2L repomobile engines out there.
Rover K Series (yes, seriously). A flawed diamond: It may have a list of faults longer than mandingo, but in a Caterham there's just nothing else that can rival it.
LSx (I'm not an expert here) - The yank version of the Rover V8. Better in every measurable way than our one: sound.
The BMW 320d engine. Miles better than all the other 2L repomobile engines out there.
Rover K Series (yes, seriously). A flawed diamond: It may have a list of faults longer than mandingo, but in a Caterham there's just nothing else that can rival it.
RBH58 said:
Welshbeef said:
Shouldn't we have nominations and winners for each engine configuration then an overall PH winner?
PossiblyBest <4, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 >12 cyls?
6 cyl is easy for me. BMW N/A M-Power, Alfa Romeo Busso V6, Jaguar XK6
8 cyl. Chev Small Block. Rover V8.
The rest. Mmmmm....
Lotus Twin cam Ford Pinto S2000 for the I4
Fiat Coupe 20V Turbo I5
E28 M5 I6
S211 E55 K V8
Gallardo LP650
Zonda R V12 AMG Merc
Over 12 cylinders I'm thinking Bugatti Chiron
Fords 'Kent' engine has to have a claim on one of the greatest 4 cyl production engines, from use in mundane versions of the Anglia, Escort, Cortina, Capri, Fiesta, as well as Lotus/Caterham 7's, it also provided the power plant for what is probably the most successful 'feeder' single-seat racing series ever - Formula Ford. It also provided the basis of the Lotus-Ford Twin Cam used in the Cortina & Escort and Lotus 7, Elan & Europa, as well as the Cosworth FVA and BDA engines...right up to the fearsome 600hp Evolution version of the BDT used in the RS200 Group B rallycar, and it can even be linked to the Hart 420 F1 engines.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff