RE: Range Rover Velar teased

RE: Range Rover Velar teased

Author
Discussion

petemurphy

10,128 posts

183 months

Wednesday 1st March 2017
quotequote all
hmmm not sure i love it - looks too much like a sport - will reserve judgement till tonight

Mr-B

3,780 posts

194 months

Wednesday 1st March 2017
quotequote all
I dislike all these SUV's and crossovers and faux x 4's but I have made an exception for the RR sport, that has grown on me. Just watching the online launch of this and I think it looks the best of the RR offerings. Very nice.

patch5674

233 posts

112 months

Wednesday 1st March 2017
quotequote all
I thought this car was being positioned more to the sport but looking at the interior I think it closer to Evoque, it has the smaller arm rest-less seats and as other have mentioned you don't get the low window line and imperious driving position.


Cfnteabag

1,195 posts

196 months

Wednesday 1st March 2017
quotequote all
Good to see Gerry Macgovern is still designing cars with a photocopier. He really is the worst thing to happen to Land Rover. I will admit probably not from a sales point of view as Bentley have proved any ugly piece of st will sell with the right badge but Land Rover just isnt Land Rover any more. I doubt there will even be a new Defender they will just keep putting it off until people stop asking

DoctorX

7,291 posts

167 months

Wednesday 1st March 2017
quotequote all
I think that looks nice from some angles, especially the front and rear. Put your hand over the front of the car in that second three quarter view in those scoop shots and look at the rest of it. Rather slab sided with a very 'heavy' looking roof (not helped by the black paint).

KTF

9,806 posts

150 months

Wednesday 1st March 2017
quotequote all
From PH on Facebook.








popeyewhite

19,907 posts

120 months

Wednesday 1st March 2017
quotequote all
Cfnteabag said:
Good to see Gerry Macgovern is still designing cars with a photocopier.
I couldn't tell the difference between that, the Disco sport, and the Evoque.

JiggyJaggy

1,451 posts

140 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
Just specced one of these up on the RR website. I chose a Velar R-Design with 22's and various add on's such as deployable side steps, 22" wheels, ebony interior with suede etc and it come up north of £60k. All of a sudden I'm wondering if Im better off buying a FFRR 2015/16 for circa £50k??? Ps I haven't ordered yet. The main thing that attracted me was the interior entertainment and screens.

FiF

44,096 posts

251 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
Cfnteabag said:
Good to see Gerry Macgovern is still designing cars with a photocopier.
I couldn't tell the difference between that, the Disco sport, and the Evoque.
To me it looks like an Evoque might look post mid life facelift. New lights front and rear, grille tidied up, door handles done something with them, really not sure that's for the best either.

Obviously all makes have some sort of corporate face/ styling cues, but anyone who denies that this is copy and paste styling taken to extreme needs to go to Specsavers.

Very poor, no more JLR products on my drive. Out.

swisstoni

17,014 posts

279 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
FiF said:
popeyewhite said:
Cfnteabag said:
Good to see Gerry Macgovern is still designing cars with a photocopier.
I couldn't tell the difference between that, the Disco sport, and the Evoque.
To me it looks like an Evoque might look post mid life facelift. New lights front and rear, grille tidied up, door handles done something with them, really not sure that's for the best either.

Obviously all makes have some sort of corporate face/ styling cues, but anyone who denies that this is copy and paste styling taken to extreme needs to go to Specsavers.

Very poor, no more JLR products on my drive. Out.
Staggering.

Anglade

239 posts

120 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
JiggyJaggy said:
Just specced one of these up on the RR website. I chose a Velar R-Design with 22's and various add on's such as deployable side steps, 22" wheels, ebony interior with suede etc and it come up north of £60k. All of a sudden I'm wondering if Im better off buying a FFRR 2015/16 for circa £50k??? Ps I haven't ordered yet. The main thing that attracted me was the interior entertainment and screens.
IMHO the Velar has just made the RRS look very dated - inside and out.
Obviously there are other reasons to buy the RRS but I'd wait a while as I think the Velar will have a significantly detrimental effect on RRs second hand values...

hornetrider

63,161 posts

205 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
Having watched the quick autocar walkaround on youtube, there's one thing that strikes me. Are those door handles asking a question that no-one ever asked? Just seems fiddly to me - push button, wait for it to pop open, then pull.

Guvernator

13,158 posts

165 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
I think it looks pretty decent. Obviously very similar to the rest of the family but really, what did you expect in this "corporate identity" obsessed rut that manufacturers seem to be in? The interior design is a step above anything else out at the moment and indeed it makes a lot of the other recent launches look very dated instantly.

My only qualm is that I don't think they've got the pricing quite right. A decent spec one without going mad is £60k+ which is into RRS territory and a massive jump between the price of a decently specced Evoque. I was interested in one initially for family duties but I'm not paying £60k for a car to drive to the shops in. I've no doubt these will sell like absolute hotcakes, you won't be able to move for them in certain parts of Essex. I think I'll wait and pick one up second hand in a few years.

I'd also agree about comments on the diesel line-up, really why? The rest of the car is bang up to date but a prominently diesel engine line-up?? Are manufacturers simply putting fingers in ears and going La La La at the huge backlash against diesel? They need to get a hybrid version out ASAP or hope that their customers are too stupid to realise that diesel is dead.

JiggyJaggy

1,451 posts

140 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
Anglade said:
IMHO the Velar has just made the RRS look very dated - inside and out.
Obviously there are other reasons to buy the RRS but I'd wait a while as I think the Velar will have a significantly detrimental effect on RRs second hand values...
Good point and good advice. If only they could that lift that infotainment centre from the Velar and plonk it in a FFRR. My problems would be solved frown

FiF

44,096 posts

251 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
Staggering.
Why? They're going down a route that is not what I like nor what I need, both in terms of styling and away from a more utilitarian approach. Therefore will not be under consideration. Clearly there will be people who do like it and think it's the cat's pyjamas. They are perfectly entitled to that opinion, as am I to mine.

swisstoni

17,014 posts

279 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
It was that you've now ruled out JLR forever that I found surprising.

RacerMike

4,209 posts

211 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
FiF said:
Why? They're going down a route that is not what I like nor what I need, both in terms of styling and away from a more utilitarian approach. Therefore will not be under consideration. Clearly there will be people who do like it and think it's the cat's pyjamas. They are perfectly entitled to that opinion, as am I to mine.
Out of interest, what are you going to chose instead of a current JLR product?

FiF

44,096 posts

251 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
RacerMike said:
FiF said:
Why? They're going down a route that is not what I like nor what I need, both in terms of styling and away from a more utilitarian approach. Therefore will not be under consideration. Clearly there will be people who do like it and think it's the cat's pyjamas. They are perfectly entitled to that opinion, as am I to mine.
Out of interest, what are you going to chose instead of a current JLR product?
That's a really good question, to which I don't have an answer.

The use is a mixture of road and off road, min of 5, often 6,, sometimes 7 days a week up farm/ forest / moorland tracks. Nothing excessive in terms of offroading, most days tbh a 2wd estate with some decent tyres would do it, except for ground clearance, a normal estate wouldn't cut it. So various JLR products had a reasonable mix of comfort and kit, on road ability, ground clearance, off road ability when it was needed and very important the underpinnings had the strength to survive all the potholes and ruts left by heavier vehicles.

I suppose one of the newer slightly raised estates, eg Octavia Scout, or one of the Scoobies could do it, but then I do like the elevated driving position, especially in these days of a seeming escalating power of the headlights battle. Many of the cheaper SUV's from other manufacturers just aren't intended for week in week out on unmettalled tracks imo. Suppose a dual cab pickup is an option, but round our way they instantly assume you're of a caravan dwelling persuasion, but they're increasingly an option, though I'm not keen on pickups generally.

I guess possibly some sort of Toyota Land Cruiser? But I ain't going to be throwing 50-60 grands worth of JLR stuff down those tracks, and then climbing back into those interiors after hours out in the rain and mud. Maybe I've been too used to getting one vehicle to cover so many uses, and go for something ratty, eg pickup, for that use and accept to have something more normal for road use.

Add in the complication that whilst, for example the Evoque , is very capable on road, and punts down my normal B road test track like a good 'un, it's way too small and I don't like the styling. A bigger much fancier version isn't going to do it either.

Sorry not answered your question, it's a quandary.

FiF

44,096 posts

251 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
It was that you've now ruled out JLR forever that I found surprising.
Ok it wasn't stated but in essence ruled out while they continue to proceed as they are, and they show no sign of changing. Plenty of long term JLR customers who are thinking the same, just not blinded by the ooh shiny, fancy digital displays Posh Spice malarkey.

RacerMike

4,209 posts

211 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
FiF said:
Add in the complication that whilst, for example the Evoque , is very capable on road, and punts down my normal B road test track like a good 'un, it's way too small and I don't like the styling. A bigger much fancier version isn't going to do it either.

Sorry not answered your question, it's a quandary.
Would a low spec Velar not fill this roll though? It's bigger than the Evoque (and quite a bit bigger on the inside), very capable on the type of off roading you do, good on road and also a nice place to sit? Just playing devils advocate as I'm just interested as to whether it's the pre-conception that the Velar is going to be terrible off road because it looks fancy and doesn't have a ladder chassis, or whether it's because it genuinely doesn't fit.

I think admittedly, you're at the point now with a Range Rover product that you're paying a premium for the badge, but they are still very, very capable in all their guises.

An Octavia allroad or Yeti is actually a very good car though, so I can't see a problem with getting one of those as you're not paying any badge premium...