Which cars are classy these days?

Which cars are classy these days?

Author
Discussion

ChemicalChaos

10,402 posts

161 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Raudus42 said:
DonkeyApple said:
Poor Rolls Royce...

What's the opposite analogy to 'you can't polish a turd'?
Maybe: 'You can't polish a turd but you can smear dog st on a Savile Row suit.'?

I think a car like Rolls Royce proves my general view of the problem was th modern cars. The Rolls is clearly a thing of beautiful craftsmanship and has the potential to be very stylish and 'classy' (albeit that is a ghastly word that like 'executive' is typically applied to things that are clearly not) but whether it is deemed so is wholly dependent on the people associated with the product.

There have always been slimeballs (visually and publicly ghastly people) driving around in Rolls Royces but for many years they were the minority of the clientele but there is a tipping point at which the percentage of these people becomes sufficient to dominate the brand perception. I think we have reached that point with not just Rolls Royce but almost every premium car brand, if not the majority of all premium products. The 'consume and display' culture is so dominant now that almost all premium goods are associated with vulgarity and tastelessness.

These brands then start to change their core values to cater for their new and dominant client demographic and so start adding 'bling' as standard and becoming even less premium until they reach the point of total charade. Which many premium products have. If you take something like the Audemars Royal Oak it was once famed for the slimness of the movement and the general balance of the watch along with its quiet subtlness, whereas today it has morphed into some bloated pastiche of a gypsy timepiece, the equivalent of a mock Georgian Essex new build called Dunrobin Mansion.

We live in a world where you can by a basic car with all the body trim of their premium, performance model but you can't buy the premium, performance model and specify that you want the base trim for its exterior. If I were wanting to buy an M3 I would not want it with all the Barry panels but would prefer it to just look like a base 3 series. I actually wouldn't mind buying a Focus RS as I think they are wonderful cars but they won't sell one that looks like a base model. We are a screaming 'Look at my wad!' society to the point that it simply isn't commercially viable to even attempt to cater for the minority who don't wish to partake.

Going back to Rolls Royce it has genuinely reached a point that you are taken aback to see someone disgorge from one and not be a temple to gypsy bling followed by a rented silicon sex carrot.

But like all fashions there will at some point be a strong reversion away from this hideousness and only then will we start to actually see 'classy' new cars again.
This, in spades.

See also: Bentley since the Continental GT, and Barbour/Belstaff jackets

phib

4,464 posts

260 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
PHAB said:
And something from the Italian stable.....before they got undignified.



Belllliiiissssiiimmaaaa! smilesmilesmile
That is very classy .. one of the last greats, love the plate. Slightly less classy in red me thinks but I do love the rear view of them.




Phib

av185

18,514 posts

128 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
Cold said:
Can a Porsche?
Drive one and you will find out.

Amirhussain

11,489 posts

164 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
epom said:
Am I mistaken or is this thread called classy cars ? No offence but how on this earth does a Megane, any Megane qualify ?
This whole thread is blessed with stupidity.

alpha channel

1,387 posts

163 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
So that's what the new Megane looks like, when I briefly passed my eye over the first picture I though it was a Golf then I spied the headlights and read read the post. Classy? nah, but closer to it than the vast majority of the Golf models I suspect.

...and that poor, poor Rolls.

MarshPhantom

9,658 posts

138 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Raudus42 said:
DonkeyApple said:
Poor Rolls Royce...

What's the opposite analogy to 'you can't polish a turd'?
Maybe: 'You can't polish a turd but you can smear dog st on a Savile Row suit.'?

I think a car like Rolls Royce proves my general view of the problem was th modern cars. The Rolls is clearly a thing of beautiful craftsmanship and has the potential to be very stylish and 'classy' (albeit that is a ghastly word that like 'executive' is typically applied to things that are clearly not) but whether it is deemed so is wholly dependent on the people associated with the product.

There have always been slimeballs (visually and publicly ghastly people) driving around in Rolls Royces but for many years they were the minority of the clientele but there is a tipping point at which the percentage of these people becomes sufficient to dominate the brand perception. I think we have reached that point with not just Rolls Royce but almost every premium car brand, if not the majority of all premium products. The 'consume and display' culture is so dominant now that almost all premium goods are associated with vulgarity and tastelessness.

These brands then start to change their core values to cater for their new and dominant client demographic and so start adding 'bling' as standard and becoming even less premium until they reach the point of total charade. Which many premium products have. If you take something like the Audemars Royal Oak it was once famed for the slimness of the movement and the general balance of the watch along with its quiet subtlness, whereas today it has morphed into some bloated pastiche of a gypsy timepiece, the equivalent of a mock Georgian Essex new build called Dunrobin Mansion.

We live in a world where you can by a basic car with all the body trim of their premium, performance model but you can't buy the premium, performance model and specify that you want the base trim for its exterior. If I were wanting to buy an M3 I would not want it with all the Barry panels but would prefer it to just look like a base 3 series. I actually wouldn't mind buying a Focus RS as I think they are wonderful cars but they won't sell one that looks like a base model. We are a screaming 'Look at my wad!' society to the point that it simply isn't commercially viable to even attempt to cater for the minority who don't wish to partake.

Going back to Rolls Royce it has genuinely reached a point that you are taken aback to see someone disgorge from one and not be a temple to gypsy bling followed by a rented silicon sex carrot.

But like all fashions there will at some point be a strong reversion away from this hideousness and only then will we start to actually see 'classy' new cars again.
Rolls and Bentley used to be fairly understated, The Phantom certainly isn't.

J4CKO

41,646 posts

201 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
Raudus42 said:
DonkeyApple said:
Raudus42 said:
DonkeyApple said:
Poor Rolls Royce...

What's the opposite analogy to 'you can't polish a turd'?
Maybe: 'You can't polish a turd but you can smear dog st on a Savile Row suit.'?

I think a car like Rolls Royce proves my general view of the problem was th modern cars. The Rolls is clearly a thing of beautiful craftsmanship and has the potential to be very stylish and 'classy' (albeit that is a ghastly word that like 'executive' is typically applied to things that are clearly not) but whether it is deemed so is wholly dependent on the people associated with the product.

There have always been slimeballs (visually and publicly ghastly people) driving around in Rolls Royces but for many years they were the minority of the clientele but there is a tipping point at which the percentage of these people becomes sufficient to dominate the brand perception. I think we have reached that point with not just Rolls Royce but almost every premium car brand, if not the majority of all premium products. The 'consume and display' culture is so dominant now that almost all premium goods are associated with vulgarity and tastelessness.

These brands then start to change their core values to cater for their new and dominant client demographic and so start adding 'bling' as standard and becoming even less premium until they reach the point of total charade. Which many premium products have. If you take something like the Audemars Royal Oak it was once famed for the slimness of the movement and the general balance of the watch along with its quiet subtlness, whereas today it has morphed into some bloated pastiche of a gypsy timepiece, the equivalent of a mock Georgian Essex new build called Dunrobin Mansion.

We live in a world where you can by a basic car with all the body trim of their premium, performance model but you can't buy the premium, performance model and specify that you want the base trim for its exterior. If I were wanting to buy an M3 I would not want it with all the Barry panels but would prefer it to just look like a base 3 series. I actually wouldn't mind buying a Focus RS as I think they are wonderful cars but they won't sell one that looks like a base model. We are a screaming 'Look at my wad!' society to the point that it simply isn't commercially viable to even attempt to cater for the minority who don't wish to partake.

Going back to Rolls Royce it has genuinely reached a point that you are taken aback to see someone disgorge from one and not be a temple to gypsy bling followed by a rented silicon sex carrot.

But like all fashions there will at some point be a strong reversion away from this hideousness and only then will we start to actually see 'classy' new cars again.
This was how this Phantom looked when it was my brothers...



And the same car after someone decided it was too subtle for them. Apparently it resides in Marbella now.



Edited by Raudus42 on Friday 3rd March 15:57
Jesus, that is a bit over the top, they can look nice with some subtle mods but looked way better standard, some people seem to lack any kind of restraint with their tastes but I think we need the extremes, to me a Phantom should be as discreet as two and half tonnes of 20ft long Roller can be, I think a lot is cultural and different cultures have different tastes, leaning to the more colourful side, where perhaps they see us as boring and a bit dowdy in our tastes, there is no right and wrong, just right and wrong for the individual.





Hungrymc

6,686 posts

138 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
Jesus, that is a bit over the top, they can look nice with some subtle mods but looked way better standard, some people seem to lack any kind of restraint with their tastes but I think we need the extremes, to me a Phantom should be as discreet as two and half tonnes of 20ft long Roller can be, I think a lot is cultural and different cultures have different tastes, leaning to the more colourful side, where perhaps they see us as boring and a bit dowdy in our tastes, there is no right and wrong, just right and wrong for the individual.
And that is as true on a personal taste level, as it is on a cultural level.

The problem (if it is a problem) is new money with different taste. So what we really have here, is lots of judgment of people who have become wealthy while having taste many think dodgy, and being ill deserving of their wealth.

There are many different definitions of "classy". It all becomes about perspective.

RDMcG

19,194 posts

208 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
A silver 300 SL Gullwing seems classy enough to me.

DonkeyApple

55,450 posts

170 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
MarshPhantom said:
Rolls and Bentley used to be fairly understated.
When was that? wink

swisstoni

17,053 posts

280 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
I'm sure there used to be more Rollers about (of all ages) than there are today.
The old Roller (often in brown) that lived in very ordinary surroundings seems to have gone away.

berlintaxi

8,535 posts

174 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
Used Bentley Continentals or FF Range Rovers are now the choice of pub landlords and small time bookies, not unusual to see one sat outside a semi-detached, Rollers have priced themselves out of that market.

MarshPhantom

9,658 posts

138 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
MarshPhantom said:
Rolls and Bentley used to be fairly understated.
When was that? wink
Well The Phantom is huge compared with everything else on the road, and they did used to make some nice looking motors.


morgrp

4,128 posts

199 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
Tough one this:

Audi has all but destroyed their "thinking man's BMW" image
Saab are gone and lost their class years ago.
Modern Volvos are pretty classy is guess - New V90 is a definite contender.
Range Rovers are pure chav these days
Mercs are nothing too

I'd agree with Land Rovers over Range rovers but really in terms of big cars I'd say BMW really are doing it for me these days - the 5 series and 6 series are great its only the sea of small diesel engined models destroying the image namely in the 1 and 3 series but Audi are no better in this respect.

I'd say Alfa are pretty classy these days too, Jags as well

DonkeyApple

55,450 posts

170 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
MarshPhantom said:
DonkeyApple said:
MarshPhantom said:
Rolls and Bentley used to be fairly understated.
When was that? wink
Well The Phantom is huge compared with everything else on the road, and they did used to make some nice looking motors.
How do you think the Shadow contrasted with other cars when it launched? How many cars over the last few decades years have slapped a monumental mock Roman temple on the front of their car and whalloped a scantily clad bint on top of it?

jamoor

14,506 posts

216 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
We live in a world where you can by a basic car with all the body trim of their premium, performance model but you can't buy the premium, performance model and specify that you want the base trim for its exterior. If I were wanting to buy an M3 I would not want it with all the Barry panels but would prefer it to just look like a base 3 series. I actually wouldn't mind buying a Focus RS as I think they are wonderful cars but they won't sell one that looks like a base model. We are a screaming 'Look at my wad!' society to the point that it simply isn't commercially viable to even attempt to cater for the minority who don't wish to partake.
Very True

I present.






With each generation there is just more and more stick on tat.

The originals were virtually indistinguishable from the original models.

wildcat45

8,077 posts

190 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
How do you think the Shadow contrasted with other cars when it launched? How many cars over the last few decades years have slapped a monumental mock Roman temple on the front of their car and whalloped a scantily clad bint on top of it?
Are you Gerry MC Govern?

That is a brilliant and highly accurate way to describe Rolls' styling

wildcat45

8,077 posts

190 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
BMW got it just right with the original M5. It was so understated that it looked not unlike a 518 with a set of posh wheels.

I think part of the problem is that a lot of us gre up in the era of L GL and Ghia, where a bit of silver trim round the grille made one model vastly superior to the model below.

Our 1984 3-Series BMW had steel wheels and no hubcaps. That was a big deal to me as a kid. I saw a similar model at a car show in the summer, it looked really great and understated.

Matt80M

1,137 posts

173 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all


Porsche 911 Targa

Much less shouty than anything else in the Porsche range.

av185

18,514 posts

128 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
Matt80M said:


Porsche 911 Targa

Much less shouty than anything else in the Porsche range.
Apart from the Carrera.