RE: MG Cyberster revealed ahead of UK debut in 2024

RE: MG Cyberster revealed ahead of UK debut in 2024

Author
Discussion

Evil.soup

3,595 posts

206 months

Monday 17th April 2023
quotequote all
Brian112Aston said:
MG? They might have bought the badge, but they didn;t get the soul. Buy British.
What do you suggest? A nice Land Rover, possibly a Jag, how about a Bentley...TVR??

Vocht

1,631 posts

165 months

Monday 17th April 2023
quotequote all
Looks great. Wouldn't look out of place with a Jaguar badge on it. Giving me F type vibes.

Pusikurac

121 posts

41 months

Monday 17th April 2023
quotequote all
James6112 said:
whp1983 said:
Looks good but wouldn’t own a Chinese car
Incl Polestar / Tesla ?
Touche

mabosh

300 posts

187 months

Monday 17th April 2023
quotequote all
I just don't see the point of the scissor doors. I assume they just add more weight, cost and unnecessary complication.

The MG4 has already had an urgent recall for a software fix to stop locking drivers in their car with no way out (other than via the emergency boot latch inside, assuming you know it's there in the first place). Not sure I'd have much confidence in these things working consistently, but at least you could just drop the roof if necessary!

Still, I look forward to the first road tests.

Dombilano

1,156 posts

56 months

Monday 17th April 2023
quotequote all
Looks good, sounds like Alan Partridge named it

Olibol

135 posts

86 months

Monday 17th April 2023
quotequote all
I’ll be having one of these for the second phase of my mid life crisis, as long as the price is where I expect it to be. Twice as heavy as my last sports car, but potentially twice the power too, so if it handles and the brakes are decent, I think I can cope.

Japveesix

4,483 posts

169 months

Monday 17th April 2023
quotequote all
Dombilano said:
Looks good, sounds like Alan Partridge named it
I think that might be the worst car name I think I've ever heard.

ChrisCh86

858 posts

45 months

Monday 17th April 2023
quotequote all
I think it looks great. Nicely styled and should have decent technology and be reasonably priced. Under 2 tonnes is a good aspiration given the weight of the batteries and will make it lighter than most BMWs these days... biglaugh


There's not exactly any competition (apart from the Tesla roadster which is still vapourware), so it should do very well.

kambites

67,628 posts

222 months

Monday 17th April 2023
quotequote all
ChrisCh86 said:
There's not exactly any competition (apart from the Tesla roadster which is still vapourware), so it should do very well.
Different price bracket too, I'd imagine! Surely they've got to be aiming to get the entry-level version of this under £50k?

Edited by kambites on Monday 17th April 22:09

Ursicles

1,070 posts

243 months

Monday 17th April 2023
quotequote all
Lot of people objecting to this car due to its Chinese links.

Ironically objecting using their Chinese made phones. But hey .. always good to make a stand and only focus on the parts that you want to.

Think the car looks great.

oilit

2,634 posts

179 months

Monday 17th April 2023
quotequote all
For me its not that its chinese, more that it has no uk content or employment associated with it. Apart from the breakdown service and the sales person who sold it (assuming its not mail order).

For £50k id rather have a 15 year old aston martin vantage or bentley continental, and 5 years worth of petrol and servicing costs.


DonkeyApple

55,560 posts

170 months

Monday 17th April 2023
quotequote all
Interesting name. As if someone totally hammered is trying to say a longer word. Does one drool at the end of the word or start snoring?

Looks nice but I can't help thinking it's going to absolutely enrage the sort of folks who would buy an object with an MG badge on it?

bennytheball

126 posts

28 months

Monday 17th April 2023
quotequote all
Ursicles said:
Lot of people objecting to this car due to its Chinese links.

Ironically objecting using their Chinese made phones. But hey .. always good to make a stand and only focus on the parts that you want to.

Think the car looks great.
Ironically objecting? But that would mean you'd have to equate spending a few hundred quid on a phone to spending tens of thousands on a car manufactured by a firm wholly owned by the Chinese state, aka the CCP.

Hardly the same thing, is it?

As for the looks of this thing, the leaked images that appeared a few days ago on other websites were rather less flattering than the official renders used here.

Iamnotkloot

1,437 posts

148 months

Monday 17th April 2023
quotequote all
kambites said:
That's a surprisingly nicely styled car.

Still, I think it has a strong claim to being the best looking EV yet.

Edited by kambites on Monday 17th April 18:48
Nah, this is miles better:

pheonix478

1,372 posts

39 months

Monday 17th April 2023
quotequote all
Ursicles said:
Lot of people objecting to this car due to its Chinese links.

Ironically objecting using their Chinese made phones. But hey .. always good to make a stand and only focus on the parts that you want to.

Think the car looks great.
How is that ironic? The phone is a tiny fraction <0.5% of the value, almost impossible to avoid and only manufactured in China if it is, hard to know... always good to make excuses for making stty choices. Your logic is inane. And yes I agree it is a good looking car/render.

GTRene

16,653 posts

225 months

Monday 17th April 2023
quotequote all
The looks are good, would be nice with a lightweight NA V6, 300 + hp and max 1100kg incl fuel.


borat52

564 posts

209 months

Tuesday 18th April 2023
quotequote all
pheonix478 said:
James6112 said:
whp1983 said:
Looks good but wouldn’t own a Chinese car
Incl Polestar / Tesla ?
Firstly, no, wouldn't own a Polestar either. Secondly MG isn't just Chinese it's state owned. So yeah, fvck 'em. Shame, lovely looking car.

Exactly, hopefully we’ll have all realised before it’s too late as CCP is successfully gutting the industrial base of the western world while we stuff McDonald’s down our faces and watch Netflix waiting for the heart attack to finish us off.

jerrytlr

418 posts

214 months

Tuesday 18th April 2023
quotequote all
pheonix478 said:
rolleyes

You don't see any difference between spending 50k 100% of which goes to the Chinese government (who are economically, strategically and now militarily aligned against us) and 50k on a non-Chinese car maybe 2-3k of which goes to China for cheap IC's, sensors and LCD's? Incidentally, the IP of the latter is mostly owned by western OEM suppliers. "While we're at it", yes you can make an effort to not buy Chinese made consumer goods, I do, but in any event again large difference between a whole car and a speaker. Not always possible to avoid of course and sometimes just impossible to know but in the case of MG, you know full well.
Agree 100% - very well put.



nickwiz

6 posts

37 months

Tuesday 18th April 2023
quotequote all
built in the UK? Or Owned by a UK based company? Nope. Sadly not really an MG then just a badge of convenience. Why? Because this country is run by short term idiots out to put quick profit above all else so sell off everything they can. Has been that way since the 1960s TBH. Those Arianne Rockets France makes a mint from launching satelites etc? British rocket engines sold off cheap by a govt that scrapped out space programme. Just one example of the idiocy at the top and in the boardrooms of this country for decades. But still despite all that an interesting and very pretty car.

sege

562 posts

223 months

Tuesday 18th April 2023
quotequote all
whp1983 said:
Looks good but wouldn’t own a Chinese car
And I would never own a British car. So this works well for me!