RE: Lotus Emeya finishes testing, looks great doing it

RE: Lotus Emeya finishes testing, looks great doing it

Author
Discussion

Om

1,809 posts

79 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
Twoshoe said:
Om said:
Master Of Puppets said:
A 4 door Lotus. vomit

I'm out.
Not a Cortina fan then?
The Lotus Cortina was only ever a 2-door.
I did check before posting - there were two 2-doors made for the Anglia Constabulary, which was good enough for me. Either way we have since found that Master Of Puppets dislikes all 4 door Lotus and not just the Cortina...

durbster

10,293 posts

223 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
It just looks too big for its wheels to me, and I'm guessing they're enormous wheels.

Is there an engineering reason why this sector of EVs have to be so enormously wide and long? Wide cars are so impractical.

kambites

67,635 posts

222 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
JerryF said:
Miserablegit said:
Let’s not pretend this is a Lotus. It’s a Chinese car from a Chinese factory for the Chinese market with a lotus badge stuck on.
Totally agree!
To be fair, it's also true of a number of other ostensibly "European" EVs such as the Mini Electric, the Smart #1, the Volvo EX30, all of the various Polestar and MG EVs, and probably any number of others.

This is as much a "Lotus" as the Cayenne is a "Porsche" and will serve a similar purpose in the lineup. Slapping the Porsche badge onto a tweaked VW SUV hasn't stopped them producing proper Porsches...

Edited by kambites on Friday 9th February 10:22

gwebby

14 posts

79 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
You just copied that from the Fiat 500 thread, getting like that Moose bloke who just says "EV = NO".

If Lotus make it, its not contradictory, its just your nostalgic view of a car company and wonder why things cant be like the past any more.

They adapt or go the way of Rover, Saab etc, and adapting means making electric vehicles.

Folk need to get used to this, or its going to be very stressful, I mean, huge companies not doing what you want, the very nerve !
Make you right, I think its more that this one just looks S*!7

blueg33

36,082 posts

225 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
I am happy for sports car company to make SUV's and saloons if it helps them continue to make sports cars. The beauty of being a consumer is that no one is forcing you to buy a Lotus SUV or saloon.

Silvanus

5,321 posts

24 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
I am happy for sports car company to make SUV's and saloons if it helps them continue to make sports cars. The beauty of being a consumer is that no one is forcing you to buy a Lotus SUV or saloon.
Not sure the success of this will have any impact on Lotus Cars making sports cars, this is produced by Lotus Tech.



alpha channel

1,387 posts

163 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
Alpenus said:
A bland blob,
Aero wheels. Tick
Fancy headlights. Tick
Rear lightbar. Tick
And NO clear glass, has not made my Friday a happy one
Not entirely true, I had a quick play with the configuration and you can get shot of the privacy glass and aero wheels (though no silver colour option on the non aero wheels, I hate black alloys, so that's an extra cost to change them), the rear light bar? colour coded clip on/tacked on covering'll sort that, another serious design dislike there myself (ditto on the Halfords number going across the front as well that are appearing on numerous cars, you'd think a manufacturer'd be able to do a better job than a Max Power aficionado).

It's the door camera's (yes I know, aero, but I'd take the slight hit in economy for one less thing to go, expensively, wrong), lack of a proper roof, god awful interior pattern on the cloth(?) (but at least there's a choice of a light colour) and serious lack of body colour's (orange, yellow, white, black and grey) that'd put me off splashing out the no doubt very high price of entry.

kambites

67,635 posts

222 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
alpha channel said:
It's the door camera's (yes I know, aero, but I'd take the slight hit in economy for one less thing to go, expensively, wrong)
I'm not sure a statically mounted digital camera is more likely to fail than the myriad of motors and heaters in a typical modern door mirror, and it really shouldn't be any more expensive to replace either; I bet it's cheaper to produce!

blueg33

36,082 posts

225 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
Silvanus said:
blueg33 said:
I am happy for sports car company to make SUV's and saloons if it helps them continue to make sports cars. The beauty of being a consumer is that no one is forcing you to buy a Lotus SUV or saloon.
Not sure the success of this will have any impact on Lotus Cars making sports cars, this is produced by Lotus Tech.
Brand

PartOfTheProblem

1,927 posts

172 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
Om said:
It looks like one of the side lights is out on that head on shot of the white car.

Lotus - still got it!
It'll just be the flicker of LEDs and the speed of the camera not aligning, I hope.

kambites

67,635 posts

222 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
Brand
yes What these cars do, is remove the need for the sports car division to make a profit in its own right; Geely will happily run the sports car division at a small loss as long as it helps them sell more saloons and SUVs.

Silvanus

5,321 posts

24 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
kambites said:
blueg33 said:
Brand
yes What these cars do, is remove the need for the sports car division to make a profit in its own right; Geely will happily run the sports car division at a small loss as long as it helps them sell more saloons and SUVs.
Or, once they are shifting enough profitable cars (Lotus Tech), quietly drop Lotus Cars altogether.

Deranged Rover

3,425 posts

75 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
Miserablegit said:
Let’s not pretend this is a Lotus. It’s a Chinese car from a Chinese factory for the Chinese market with a lotus badge stuck on.
Seems about right.

kambites

67,635 posts

222 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
Silvanus said:
Or, once they are shifting enough profitable cars (Lotus Tech), quietly drop Lotus Cars altogether.
Perhaps, but people said the same about Porsche when they started badge engineering VW SUVs, yet Porsche are still producing sports cars. Ultimately, in both cases, it will come down to whether the sports cars provide net value to the corporation, which isn't the same as making a profit in their own right.

Edited by kambites on Friday 9th February 10:39

EBRANDON1

170 posts

5 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
Miserablegit said:
Let’s not pretend this is a Lotus. It’s a Chinese car from a Chinese factory for the Chinese market with a lotus badge stuck on.
Absolutely. take off the badges, if this drove past me I'd just assume it was another kia, toyota or something mass produced in Asia and to be replaced in a years time.

But, if this makes the likes of the Evija financially viable for Lotus then its not all bad.

seefarr

1,473 posts

187 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
wistec1 said:
It pains me to say yet again that for me Lotus and Electric together will never be of any interest. The concept is contradictory. Yet another brand lost to the ideology of EV.
You just copied that from the Fiat 500 thread, getting like that Moose bloke who just says "EV = NO".
BP really needs to sack their PH post bot. Posting the same thing every EV thread is just laziness.

Macboy

746 posts

206 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
But who's it for? The market for large electric four door saloons and five door SUVs is already busy with new models and the number of people with £100k+ to spend (even businesses using tax breaks) is finite. Jaguar is aiming at the market when it relaunches, Maserati too as well as the established Big3 from Germany, Taycan is in a Gen2 form and will soak up Porsche loyalists and conquest some new buyers so who exactly is this for? There have to be some upcoming losers in this market and Lotus looks in prime position to be one regardless of the "what about China" justification that everyone makes about demand for luxury EVs.

SDK

903 posts

254 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
Macboy said:
But who's it for? The market for large electric four door saloons and five door SUVs is already busy with new models and the number of people with £100k+ to spend (even businesses using tax breaks) is finite. Jaguar is aiming at the market when it relaunches, Maserati too as well as the established Big3 from Germany, Taycan is in a Gen2 form and will soak up Porsche loyalists and conquest some new buyers so who exactly is this for? There have to be some upcoming losers in this market and Lotus looks in prime position to be one regardless of the "what about China" justification that everyone makes about demand for luxury EVs.
This is for people who want a Porsche Taycan type car for cheaper .Looks like this will be around £30k+ less than the equivalent Taycan.

Neill-l9qpf

66 posts

79 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
That rear 3/4 in orange looks worryingly like a Kia Stinger.

Except the Kia would have a better warranty

98elise

26,720 posts

162 months

Friday 9th February
quotequote all
dunnoreally said:
I am constantly baffled by the whole "Lotus is making money, therefore it's fine" argument. I'm not arguing that there's a business case for this blob. I'm sure it makes perfect financial sense.

I'm sad because even a brand like Lotus can't turn a profit by making cars that I would want to buy and instead we get yet more things like this.

If Slayer found they had to start making bubblegum pop in order to put food on the table, I'm not sure many metal fans would be particularly happy about it even if we understood why, from the band's perspective, it was a necessary move.
You (and I) might want to buy them, but hardly anyone else does hence the tiny sales of previous cars. You can't run a car business selling to a few enthusiasts.