RE: New Mercedes-AMG GT 43 arrives with 421hp

RE: New Mercedes-AMG GT 43 arrives with 421hp

Author
Discussion

je777

341 posts

104 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
I like the colour.

Amanitin

422 posts

137 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
LotusOmega375D said:
Plenty more bile in my spleen, thanks. biggrin
this is either a reference I'm unfamiliar with or you've been in a horrible accident

Leon R

3,206 posts

96 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
D4rez said:
Leon R said:
Nobody wanted the C63 with that engine so why would anyone want to pay even more for this.
Because in short order this is pretty much what they will be able to offer. They need to start socialising a 4-cylinder in a performance car for emissions reasons. If it even grabs them an extra 10% sales it’s probably worth doing at this point and as I said long term it will be important unless they want to go fully EV ahead of the tech being ready for this type of car.

We will gradually see fewer and fewer big cap engines and so expect to see more of this
So no reason why anyone would WANT this.

That's what I figured.

Red6

363 posts

56 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
LotusOmega375D said:
Angelo1985 said:
Guys, wouldn’t it be time to stop moaning about 4 cylinders
No not even close. Plenty more bile in my spleen, thanks. biggrin
This comment wins the internet lolz

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,062 posts

98 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
I can understand why Mercedes UK have decided not to import this, given that it would probably cost well into 6 figures and don't think the market is ready to pay that sort of money for a 4 cylinder car.

Not really clear in which countries there would be a market for this, unless it fulfils some sort of tax break brief somewhere...

RSbandit

2,605 posts

132 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
Maybe that engine works in a Cayman at a much lower price point(I've driven that and it's OK but sounds so dull) but at over 6 figures that's another story...last Gen V8 GTR all the way thanks.

GTRene

16,561 posts

224 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
I think it looks good inside outside, although not a fan of such big TV screen, but hey.

it seems the engine is mostly for country's like the Netherlands and sort, it save 80k to a V8 version because of BPM tax Co2/gr/km.

love such longitudinal 4 cill engine with 420hp, could be a great swap engine for a lot of cars in the future.

CG2020UK

1,488 posts

40 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
That’s a really good looking car!

JJJ.

1,247 posts

15 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
Depressing.

ex-devonpaul

1,188 posts

137 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
Leon R said:
Nobody wanted the C63 with that engine so why would anyone want to pay even more for this.
They have to use them up somewhow.

They'll be in M class and G wagons by Xmas and the S class next spring.

As for being impressed by the power, Fiat had 300 Hp from their 4 cylinder S76 in 1910. Now THAT was a 4 cyl engine.

Edited by ex-devonpaul on Tuesday 19th March 13:23

JackJarvis

2,231 posts

134 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
Looks great.. but I think I'd rather just cut to the chase and have an EV version. I find the prospect equally exciting as the 2.0 4 pot.

Simoninspalding

78 posts

11 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
ex-devonpaul said:
Leon R said:
Nobody wanted the C63 with that engine so why would anyone want to pay even more for this.
They have to use them up somewhow.

They'll be in M class and G wagons by Xmas and the S class next spring.

As for being impressed by the power, Fiat had 300 Hp from their 4 cylinder S76 in 1910. Now THAT was a 4 cyl engine.

Edited by ex-devonpaul on Tuesday 19th March 13:23
To be fair that engine did exceed 28 litres capacity, and you would struggle to fit it under the bonnet of an A classbiglaugh

J4CKO

41,566 posts

200 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
I usually say its fine, the target market doesnt care, its got plenty of power yadda yadda, but in this case, nope, the target market I would imagine do care and this would be like getting home and realising the burgers your bought in a hurry are "plant based" and the beers 0 percent, i.e. probably fine but not what you wanted.


HighwayStar

4,259 posts

144 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
Angelo1985 said:
Looks better than the previous generation, although the back remembers too much a 911.

Guys, wouldn’t it be time to stop moaning about 4 cylinders engines? Especially when they offer this level of performance.
The only thing I am not sure of is how these engine will be in 10 years. Most are complex high revving engines and although you could say that for every new car, what will the durability be?
Those who are actually interested in cars, how that level of performance is served up, PHers… it’s not anything to get excited about. It’s not bad. It’s ok. It’s acceptable… generally not what I want from what I’m buying… even less so from something as likely to be £100k plus. I have an acceptable 10yr old car for daily duties and something with a proper engine for April-November. If I didn’t have it the daily would have to be something more interesting.
The Merc could never be that car…

Wills2

22,834 posts

175 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
Angelo1985 said:
Guys, wouldn’t it be time to stop moaning about 4 cylinders engines? Especially when they offer this level of performance.
It offers £60k 4 series levels of performance but for twice the price and gives that via 4 pot instead of a straight 6, no I think the moaning will continue.







biggbn

23,360 posts

220 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
Leon R said:
D4rez said:
Leon R said:
Nobody wanted the C63 with that engine so why would anyone want to pay even more for this.
Because in short order this is pretty much what they will be able to offer. They need to start socialising a 4-cylinder in a performance car for emissions reasons. If it even grabs them an extra 10% sales it’s probably worth doing at this point and as I said long term it will be important unless they want to go fully EV ahead of the tech being ready for this type of car.

We will gradually see fewer and fewer big cap engines and so expect to see more of this
So no reason why anyone would WANT this.

That's what I figured.
Love it, I'd have one in a heartbeat. In that lairy green please.

NGK210

2,936 posts

145 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
Can’t help thinking Merc has missed out by not developing a c. 2.5-litre V6 turbo battery hybrid, which obvs would’ve had useful mktng synergy with F1.

Sub-200g/km with 450-650bhp, depending on tune / model status, and many torques would be just the ticket for this GT, SLs, E- and C-class AMGs, etc.

A V6 turbo PHEV seems to work OK in those other Sunday racers’ road cars, the Artura and 296 GTB. Why not an AMG GT, too?

Edited by NGK210 on Tuesday 19th March 14:36

Nish Gnackers

1,029 posts

41 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
LotusOmega375D said:
Angelo1985 said:
Guys, wouldn’t it be time to stop moaning about 4 cylinders
No not even close. Plenty more bile in my spleen, thanks. biggrin
Before Professor Plum (retired by the sea) corrects the above.

Bile is produced and secreted from the liver, not from the spleen. smile

Hoofy

76,362 posts

282 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
I struggle to justify in my head that an F-Type is fine with a 2 litre engine but this is taking things to a whole new level. I feel like it needs at least a V6 if not a V8.

D4rez

1,392 posts

56 months

Tuesday 19th March
quotequote all
Leon R said:
D4rez said:
Leon R said:
Nobody wanted the C63 with that engine so why would anyone want to pay even more for this.
Because in short order this is pretty much what they will be able to offer. They need to start socialising a 4-cylinder in a performance car for emissions reasons. If it even grabs them an extra 10% sales it’s probably worth doing at this point and as I said long term it will be important unless they want to go fully EV ahead of the tech being ready for this type of car.

We will gradually see fewer and fewer big cap engines and so expect to see more of this
So no reason why anyone would WANT this.

That's what I figured.
Ah sure yes. Perhaps in the context of in future having less choice the audience will want it more. If not… oh well..