RE: 2024 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N | PH Review

RE: 2024 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N | PH Review

Author
Discussion

Oz83

688 posts

140 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
sam.rog said:
Name another 600hp car for less.
It’s getting very tiresome reading the same drivel on every ev topic.
So you can’t afford it, move on, there are plenty of people who can.
Well 600bhp is only half the story. The other half is that it weighs as much as the Death Star.
Without the overboost (so 609bhp) the Hyundai has a very similar power to weight (272 vs 267) as a Model Y Performance, which is £5k less.

For practicality, charging network and range, the Tesla beats it. Also, can the Hyundai be fitted with a towbar?


ajap1979

8,014 posts

188 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
whp1983 said:
sam.rog said:
Name another 600hp car for less.
It’s getting very tiresome reading the same drivel on every ev topic.
So you can’t afford it, move on, there are plenty of people who can.
It’s a fair point though, bhp per ton…. There are a few competitors which offer more power, great handling, offer more excitement for less money. I can afford one of these and wouldn’t have it - nothing to do with price.
It has almost exactly the same bhp/ton as a G80 M3, or much more if you base it on the boosted power figure. I’m sure the M3 will handle better, but the entertainment aspect could be subjective. Oh, and the BMW is £17k more expensive.

I think Hyundai should be applauded for the efforts they have made to give this car some character, and make it entertaining to drive. Sure there are still compromises that some people (who will probably never drive one) will be unwilling to overlook, but you can’t say it isn’t progress.

J4CKO

41,641 posts

201 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
ajap1979 said:
British Beef said:
Im really split with this car, would it be a good replacement for my Yaris GR?

As fun? probably not at nearly 1ton heavier
As fast? Way faster - which actually will be a problem on the public roads.
As practical? bigger, so more so (but ot the reason for owning this as a 3rd or 4th car)
Reliability??? GR has been perfect over 3 years, this cannot be any better.
Cost? it will take about 250,000 miles to recoup the difference in purchase cost in fuel saving compared to Yaris GR...... so probably not sound economical buy on that basis.

I think Ive answered my own question.
At least you’re carrying on PH tradition of comparing every new car to the GR Yaris, regardless of how irrelevant the comparison is.
Its a perfectly relevant comparison as two posters own them and were considering changing theirs for an EV, wasnt just plucked out of thin air as some yardstick.

Is interesting as to whether these big, heavy, very powerful EVs will become a problem as to be honest not really seen any EV's being driven very quickly as I think most are trying to preserve range.

Think the problems will come when they migrate down, or become attractive to the usual types who blast between lights in a sketchy looking cat S RS3, but are they bothered as it doesnt make a load of noise to announce their awesomeness ?

Familymad

678 posts

218 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
This will be a cracking all round road car. I see it as a Golf R replacement that sounds average but counters with all weather ability but lacks a little soul. Even better that this will be cheap in 2yrs time and you can’t really rag it or wreck the engine, so they are sound used buys plus a long battery warranty.

I’m in when the Tesla lease is up. Will definitely take one for a test drive.

Bloxxcreative

521 posts

46 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
Good going Hyundai. This software will bring something back to EVs for us who drive for pleasure. I'm sure it won't be long before you'll be able to map driving modes, so it performs like ICE cars.

Fancy that old school turbo power. Map to cossie mode. For that hunkered down rear wheel drive, 911 mode. Crazy drift mode, hoonigan map. Like gran tursimo played out in real life.

911Spanker

1,242 posts

17 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
A Stellar effort.

Sway

26,330 posts

195 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
Frimley111R said:
blearyeyedboy said:
Absolutely not a hot hatch...
Well it is. It's hot and it is a hatchback.

However, the definition of a HH remains the same but a more powerful/sporty family hatchback has been stretched way way beyond the original intention of the term hot hatch.

We think of a HH as a 205/Golf GTI/Fiesta ST etc but there are monster hatches like the Golf R/AMG A45/new CTR and now this which were never intended to be a simple HH.

Hyper Hatch maybe? But as most of us define a HH, this Hyundai isn't true to our definition of one.
Things evolve, but this isnt something I would say has much of a claim on the title at two and a bit tons, I dont think anything much over say 1300/1400 kilos (preferably less) can ever claim to be a full blooded hot hatch, would say also no more than 4 cylinders, is front wheel drive, has at least 120 bhp per ton and doesn't cost much more than the average UK yearly wage which is about £35,000 at the moment.
Seems Frimley would also consider a Range Rover Sport as being a hot hatch!

Neill-l9qpf

64 posts

79 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
It's an impressive feat, but I'm not quite sure who this is aimed at?

It's a bit big, heavy and far too expensive to tempt anyone out of a ICE hot hatch.

I don't think it's grown up enough to tempt anyone out of a German performance EV (Taycan , i4 etc)

Meanwhile, the EV crowd will probably ignore it because the normal Ioniq5 has more than enough performance while being 50% cheaper.

Terminator X

15,110 posts

205 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
ajap1979 said:
British Beef said:
Im really split with this car, would it be a good replacement for my Yaris GR?

As fun? probably not at nearly 1ton heavier
As fast? Way faster - which actually will be a problem on the public roads.
As practical? bigger, so more so (but ot the reason for owning this as a 3rd or 4th car)
Reliability??? GR has been perfect over 3 years, this cannot be any better.
Cost? it will take about 250,000 miles to recoup the difference in purchase cost in fuel saving compared to Yaris GR...... so probably not sound economical buy on that basis.

I think Ive answered my own question.
At least you’re carrying on PH tradition of comparing every new car to the GR Yaris, regardless of how irrelevant the comparison is.
Would Sir prefer the 330d tuned?

TX.

Frimley111R

15,683 posts

235 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
Neill-l9qpf said:
It's an impressive feat, but I'm not quite sure who this is aimed at?

It's a bit big, heavy and far too expensive to tempt anyone out of a ICE hot hatch.

I don't think it's grown up enough to tempt anyone out of a German performance EV (Taycan , i4 etc)

Meanwhile, the EV crowd will probably ignore it because the normal Ioniq5 has more than enough performance while being 50% cheaper.
Yep, as I said earlier, someone said the same of a current shape CTR (excluding the big/heavy part)

Frimley111R

15,683 posts

235 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
911Spanker said:
A Stellar effort.
I see what you did there wink

Frimley111R

15,683 posts

235 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
Sway said:
J4CKO said:
Frimley111R said:
blearyeyedboy said:
Absolutely not a hot hatch...
Well it is. It's hot and it is a hatchback.

However, the definition of a HH remains the same but a more powerful/sporty family hatchback has been stretched way way beyond the original intention of the term hot hatch.

We think of a HH as a 205/Golf GTI/Fiesta ST etc but there are monster hatches like the Golf R/AMG A45/new CTR and now this which were never intended to be a simple HH.

Hyper Hatch maybe? But as most of us define a HH, this Hyundai isn't true to our definition of one.
Things evolve, but this isnt something I would say has much of a claim on the title at two and a bit tons, I dont think anything much over say 1300/1400 kilos (preferably less) can ever claim to be a full blooded hot hatch, would say also no more than 4 cylinders, is front wheel drive, has at least 120 bhp per ton and doesn't cost much more than the average UK yearly wage which is about £35,000 at the moment.
Seems Frimley would also consider a Range Rover Sport as being a hot hatch!
Not really, I'm assuming the Ionic is a hatch although some seem to consider it an SUV.

ajap1979

8,014 posts

188 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
Neill-l9qpf said:
It's an impressive feat, but I'm not quite sure who this is aimed at?

It's a bit big, heavy and far too expensive to tempt anyone out of a ICE hot hatch.

I don't think it's grown up enough to tempt anyone out of a German performance EV (Taycan , i4 etc)

Meanwhile, the EV crowd will probably ignore it because the normal Ioniq5 has more than enough performance while being 50% cheaper.
I suppose you could ask the same about the Kia EV6 GT, Polestar 2 Performance, BMW i4 M50, and Tesla Model 3 Performance. They’re all around the same price and people seem to buy/rent/whatever them.

Jon_S_Rally

3,424 posts

89 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
Dingu said:
Like most people you probably can’t afford either so it’s probably a moot point.

Gears are a compromise generally tbh, you only like them because you are used to it.
Not sure that last bit is true. I've driven loads of auto/DCT cars and, in the good ones, you can't really tell what it's doing if you're driving normally. However, while it's good, I don't necessarily want that. Sometimes I want to enjoy the experience of actually driving the car, part of which is controlling the machine. That is why I like manual cars, and why I like driving competitively. It is the experience of operating the machine and trying to get the most out of it.

That's not to take anything away from what Hyundai have achieved here, because this appears to be one of the most convincing attempts at making a fun, engaging EV so far. Hopefully it is a big step towards more affordable, accessible and fun EVs, but that doesn't mean it is necessarily a replacement for what a manual, ICE car can offer to many enthusiasts.

Taz73

164 posts

13 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
These are great looking things even in non N spec, but I do think it would be even better if i30 sized. As great as this really does appear to be, I can't help but feel it's a shame that now the only N you can buy new is a £65k+ giant heavyweight EV, which whilst not expensive for what it actually is, is a far cry from petrol N models, so I can't imagine many moving from one to the other.
If I could afford it, no doubt I'd be tempted, though my EV of choice, which I also can not afford, is the abarth 500, silly noises and all.

740EVTORQUES

405 posts

2 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
I’m sure it will be brilliant and I applaud Hyundai’s inventiveness. If it’s anything like the EV6 GT it will be a cracking drive. I’m itching to try one at our local dealer as a possible next car after my EV6 GT.


I do wonder though whether the trickery will wear thin after a bit and people will just drive it like a hyper-EV just like they turn off all the fake sound effects after about 3 days?

‘Hyper-EV’ that’s going to trigger some ICE diehards!

SDK

895 posts

254 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
Chris Harris liked it - "Dynamically more capable than an RS6"



Edited by SDK on Thursday 21st March 10:48

Paul Thorpe evo

4 posts

7 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
If you looking to replace an ice hatch - instead, may I suggest an Arbath 500e tourismo - 155bhp/140 miles/1440kg and now £12,500 discount…fishers and Arnold Clarke doing them at £27500 just delivery miles. The car is brilliant….hardly drive my other fleet now !

PistonTim

514 posts

140 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
£786 net on 48 / 80,000 with Tusker salary sacrifice.

A Tesla model Y performance is £782 by comparison.

and the BMW ix40 is £720.


Considering the extra engineering and power hike it's not a bad deal compared to similar vehicles.

Sway

26,330 posts

195 months

Thursday 21st March
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
Sway said:
J4CKO said:
Frimley111R said:
blearyeyedboy said:
Absolutely not a hot hatch...
Well it is. It's hot and it is a hatchback.

However, the definition of a HH remains the same but a more powerful/sporty family hatchback has been stretched way way beyond the original intention of the term hot hatch.

We think of a HH as a 205/Golf GTI/Fiesta ST etc but there are monster hatches like the Golf R/AMG A45/new CTR and now this which were never intended to be a simple HH.

Hyper Hatch maybe? But as most of us define a HH, this Hyundai isn't true to our definition of one.
Things evolve, but this isnt something I would say has much of a claim on the title at two and a bit tons, I dont think anything much over say 1300/1400 kilos (preferably less) can ever claim to be a full blooded hot hatch, would say also no more than 4 cylinders, is front wheel drive, has at least 120 bhp per ton and doesn't cost much more than the average UK yearly wage which is about £35,000 at the moment.
Seems Frimley would also consider a Range Rover Sport as being a hot hatch!
Not really, I'm assuming the Ionic is a hatch although some seem to consider it an SUV.
It IS an SUV! It's bloody massive.

I'd suggest it's about the same size as 1st gen RRS.