RE: 2024 Rolls-Royce Spectre | UK Review

RE: 2024 Rolls-Royce Spectre | UK Review

Author
Discussion

TV200

79 posts

71 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
So a 102kWh battery, with a efficiency of 2.6-2.8miles per kWh. So how can the range be 329 miles? Surely at best its 102 x 2.8 = 285.6? Is the extra due to anticipated regeneration?

JJJ.

1,327 posts

16 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
The car itself looks refreshing to my eyes. But it suffers from the same problem as all EV's, the range as I'm guessing real world use is 250 miles taking it handy with favourable ambient temps.
Actually, it's not the range, rather the time it takes to charge even just to 80%. Who wants to initially plan a long trip based around charging points/distance and be stuck at public charging point (a working one with no queue) for 45 minutes or whatever with 300k + car, it doesn't make sense in that scenario.
Still, as daily driver from home to the City I'm sure it would be ideal.

jhonn

1,567 posts

150 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
JJJ. said:

Actually, it's not the range, rather the time it takes to charge even just to 80%. Who wants to initially plan a long trip based around charging points/distance and be stuck at public charging point (a working one with no queue) for 45 minutes or whatever with 300k + car, it doesn't make sense in that scenario.
Indeed; also, even charging at home, who wants to stand outside faffing around with cables/plugs every day or two - how plebeian.

Of course, if one is wealthy enough to afford one in the first place, one might have a minion or lackey to do that tedious st for you.

hentington

4 posts

165 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
Is this based on the same platform as the i7?

JJJ.

1,327 posts

16 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
jhonn said:
how plebeian.
biggrin



samoht

5,750 posts

147 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all

When introducing a new car, it's handy to include at least one photograph showing the side profile


I think this should do well. The fact is that EVs are better in some ways and worse in others than combustion engined cars. But if you're rich enough to afford a Rolls, you likely have several cars. Therefore you can easily include an EV as one of the many, use it where it suits and take a petrol car when that would be more convenient. And charging at home in the garage is much more civilised than having to go stand on a petrol station forecourt. Plus, many owners in this price bracket probably have their own company they can put the car through, making it tax favourable.

I wonder how maintenance costs will be as these age? Given that Harris described a V12 Phantom as the worst car he's had from that perspective (against competition of various big-engined Ferraris etc), and other EVs seem to range from almost zero running costs to expensive liabilities.

Leon R

3,214 posts

97 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
My Rolls-Royce is too heavy, said no one ever.

jhonn

1,567 posts

150 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
samoht said:
And charging at home in the garage is much more civilised than having to go stand on a petrol station forecourt.
Would it be preferable though? I for one could not be arsed garaging my car every night, or when it would need charging. So, (for me) that would mean charging it outside, or putting up a car-port canopy to shelter from the weather.
At least in a petrol station forecourt you're generally under a canopy, can fill up in about 5 minutes, pay at the pump, and be on your way with a probable 400+ miles range.

JJJ.

1,327 posts

16 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
samoht said:
And charging at home in the garage is much more civilised than having to go stand on a petrol station forecourt.
Come on, that's no justification for having an EV. That's real EV warrior bull.
Filled up with 75l of fuel yesterday, it took five minutes including paying for it. The lady opposite me was filling her little Toyota...real uncivilised st was going down!

samoht

5,750 posts

147 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
jhonn said:
Would it be preferable though? I for one could not be arsed garaging my car every night, or when it would need charging. So, (for me) that would mean charging it outside, or putting up a car-port canopy to shelter from the weather.
At least in a petrol station forecourt you're generally under a canopy, can fill up in about 5 minutes, pay at the pump, and be on your way with a probable 400+ miles range.
With an automatic garage door and a decently spacious garage, there's very little hassle involved in garaging a car. If the garage is integral with the house, it can even save you having to venture outside at all.

I think perhaps you may be overlooking the other ways in which the typical RR owner's life differs from that of you and me, which affect the convenience.

But regardless, if you have to park a car anywhere and get out, the extra time & effort to plug in a cable hanging just nearby is really minimal, it's less of an effort than getting something out of the boot, say.

NGK210

2,975 posts

146 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
In practice, it seems to deliver.
Lovely cabin.
Fugly, disjointed exterior. Again.
Mercy! Can’t we have just one luxury carmaker that produces elegant, cohesively styled exteriors – surely there’d be sufficient demand?
confused

ajap1979

8,014 posts

188 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
JJJ. said:
Actually, it's not the range, rather the time it takes to charge even just to 80%. Who wants to initially plan a long trip based around charging points/distance and be stuck at public charging point (a working one with no queue) for 45 minutes or whatever with 300k + car, it doesn't make sense in that scenario.
That’s not really how most people approach long trips in an EV. You don’t set off with 100% and run the battery down, then face sitting on a charger for ages. You use the charge curve to make maybe a couple of much shorter stops where the charge rate is optimised. That might sound like a PITA, but it really isn’t in practice.

Master Bean

3,586 posts

121 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
It has buttons and knobs. Thumbs up from me.

JJJ.

1,327 posts

16 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
ajap1979 said:
JJJ. said:
Actually, it's not the range, rather the time it takes to charge even just to 80%. Who wants to initially plan a long trip based around charging points/distance and be stuck at public charging point (a working one with no queue) for 45 minutes or whatever with 300k + car, it doesn't make sense in that scenario.
That’s not really how most people approach long trips in an EV. You don’t set off with 100% and run the battery down, then face sitting on a charger for ages. You use the charge curve to make maybe a couple of much shorter stops where the charge rate is optimised. That might sound like a PITA, but it really isn’t in practice.
Approach (plan) long trips, use the charge curve and stop more often? Ok..



samoht

5,750 posts

147 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
JJJ. said:
samoht said:
And charging at home in the garage is much more civilised than having to go stand on a petrol station forecourt.
Come on, that's no justification for having an EV. That's real EV warrior bull.
Filled up with 75l of fuel yesterday, it took five minutes including paying for it. The lady opposite me was filling her little Toyota...real uncivilised st was going down!
But if you could have simply continued on your way home and then spent five seconds plugging in a cable, that would have been even easier.

I'm not saying that refuelling a petrol car is a major burden or anything. But I think we become used to finding a petrol station, negotiating access to a pump, standing next to the car holding the nozzle, going to pay (sometimes queueing to do so), and rejoining the road.

I'm not making out this is a big thing or a decision driver to go EV, it's a minor motoring inconvenience, but at the top-end luxury level these are the kinds of minor inconvenience which you're looking to avoid.

andy43

9,733 posts

255 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
JJJ. said:
ajap1979 said:
JJJ. said:
Actually, it's not the range, rather the time it takes to charge even just to 80%. Who wants to initially plan a long trip based around charging points/distance and be stuck at public charging point (a working one with no queue) for 45 minutes or whatever with 300k + car, it doesn't make sense in that scenario.
That’s not really how most people approach long trips in an EV. You don’t set off with 100% and run the battery down, then face sitting on a charger for ages. You use the charge curve to make maybe a couple of much shorter stops where the charge rate is optimised. That might sound like a PITA, but it really isn’t in practice.
Approach (plan) long trips, use the charge curve and stop more often? Ok..
I’m not sure I’d fancy dumping that next to Doris’s MG for 45 minutes while I browse the M&S sandwiches.
These won’t be public charged.

jhonn

1,567 posts

150 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
samoht said:
With an automatic garage door and a decently spacious garage, there's very little hassle involved in garaging a car. If the garage is integral with the house, it can even save you having to venture outside at all.

I think perhaps you may be overlooking the other ways in which the typical RR owner's life differs from that of you and me, which affect the convenience.
OK, you're right, I've no real idea how the typical owner of this RR would actually live. However, let me paint a picture...

You've done good for yourself, you've got the stately pile in the countryside with its sweeping driveway, a range of rustic outbuildings and detached garages (not integral to the house, that's a bit...uh.. council biggrin ). You arrive home after spending the day in the city trading futures, and you absolutely need to charge the car, to do the same tomorrow.
You don't have a charger by the front door entrance, because it would look st attached to the Georgian pillars, so you have to park it round the back or in the garage. So now your car is dictating your actions and priorities - that's not just inconvenient, it's draconian! wink

Chris Stott

13,413 posts

198 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
The profile is amazing, and the rear is OK, but the face doesn’t match the rest of the car IMO.

Interior is typically RR levels of sublime.

Nish Gnackers

1,045 posts

42 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
Salon Privé 2023

Saw it, sat in it, sniffed the interior, love it.


ajap1979

8,014 posts

188 months

Saturday 23rd March
quotequote all
JJJ. said:
ajap1979 said:
JJJ. said:
Actually, it's not the range, rather the time it takes to charge even just to 80%. Who wants to initially plan a long trip based around charging points/distance and be stuck at public charging point (a working one with no queue) for 45 minutes or whatever with 300k + car, it doesn't make sense in that scenario.
That’s not really how most people approach long trips in an EV. You don’t set off with 100% and run the battery down, then face sitting on a charger for ages. You use the charge curve to make maybe a couple of much shorter stops where the charge rate is optimised. That might sound like a PITA, but it really isn’t in practice.
Approach (plan) long trips, use the charge curve and stop more often? Ok..
Not sure whether you’re agreeing, or disagreeing, but I speak as someone with experience.

A lot is made of the “planning” aspect, but I promise you, it really doesn’t take that much brain power. Or it can involve none at all, just let the car do the work for you.