RE: 2024 Mazda MX-5 RF Exclusive Line | PH Review

RE: 2024 Mazda MX-5 RF Exclusive Line | PH Review

Author
Discussion

horsemeatscandal

1,240 posts

104 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
I've said it before but for me this car is less than the sum of its parts. I enjoyed mine for 2.5 years but ultimately wasn't sad to see it go.

Wardy5

138 posts

206 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
horsemeatscandal said:
I've said it before but for me this car is less than the sum of its parts. I enjoyed mine for 2.5 years but ultimately wasn't sad to see it go.
What did you replace it with?

horsemeatscandal

1,240 posts

104 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
Wardy5 said:
What did you replace it with?
A 22 year old Honda Accord which of course sounds a bit silly on paper but it's quicker, more practical, more comfortable, handles better, sounds nicer and is subjectively much more interesting/cooler. The Mazda beats the Honda on MPG and electric things working properly.

Out with the old:



In with the far older:


GeniusOfLove

1,351 posts

12 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
I bought a new ND2 in 2019 and kept it for 4 years and gave it absolute bloody murder for 36k including a couple of 3,000 mile drives around Europe and a lot of B road hooning in mid Wales.

Aside from some concerns about the robustness of the paint (so many stonechips...) and the gearbox starting to whine a bit when I sold it I couldn't have asked for more for £23k brand new for a top spec car. It was the perfect companion for exploring all the tiny mountain roads during the COVID lockdowns when all the rambler gnomes were cowering with fear at home too hehe

Lowering springs help make the car a much more enjoyable thing to drive hard, but it really needs thicker ARBs too as they can still be a little confidence sapping in long fast sweeping bends. The engine feels borderline exotic against the turbocharged farters you get these days too.

Highly recommended. and these recent updates all seem really positive. They appear to have tarted up the trim on the centre console too.

GeniusOfLove

1,351 posts

12 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
horsemeatscandal said:
A 22 year old Honda Accord which of course sounds a bit silly on paper but it's quicker, more practical, more comfortable, handles better, sounds nicer and is subjectively much more interesting/cooler. The Mazda beats the Honda on MPG and electric things working properly.

Out with the old:



In with the far older:

A nice addition to the MX5 maybe but a very odd replacement. They make a good 2nd or 3rd car so if you're just running one I can see why the practicality and total lack of refinement could get very old, sometimes I'd force myself to make my weekly 260 round trip to London in it but most of the time I didn't really enjoy that very much.

I replaced mine with a 5 litre XKR, which feels remarkably like an MX5 that became a roid rager, but I miss my ND all the time.

Edited by GeniusOfLove on Wednesday 27th March 12:23

horsemeatscandal

1,240 posts

104 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
GeniusOfLove said:
A nice addition to the MX5 maybe but a very odd replacement. They make a good 2nd or 3rd car so if you're just running one I can see why the practicality and total lack of refinement could get very old, sometimes I'd force myself to make my weekly 260 round trip to London in it but most of the time I didn't really enjoy that very much.

I replaced mine with a 5 litre XKR, which feels remarkably like an MX5 that became a roid rager, but I miss my ND all the time.

Edited by GeniusOfLove on Wednesday 27th March 12:23
Different strokes, I suppose. The individual aspects of the MX5 were good, but together as a package it all just felt a bit 'meh'. I'm hardly the first to say it but the steering in these is absolutely criminal. During my ownership I never felt like the lack of practicality was an issue, but maybe it was subconsciously.

Appreciate you editing your comment laugh

Justin-ow582

141 posts

105 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
Mr Miata said:
£35,000 for a 9 year old design. No thanks.

Compared to modern hot hatches, 184bhp is under powered.

Edited by Mr Miata on Wednesday 27th March 02:08
I'll join in too...

£35k for a 9 year old design MX-5 or...
£45k for a 7 year old design Merc A35 that gets fairly average scores on several reviews.

I'd personally prefer the lighter, manual, higher revving, naturally aspirated convertible/targa than the lure of 300hp and 4WD (been there, done that).

GeniusOfLove

1,351 posts

12 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
horsemeatscandal said:
Different strokes, I suppose. The individual aspects of the MX5 were good, but together as a package it all just felt a bit 'meh'. I'm hardly the first to say it but the steering in these is absolutely criminal. During my ownership I never felt like the lack of practicality was an issue, but maybe it was subconsciously.

Appreciate you editing your comment laugh
I was a bit rude, apologies hehe I went and found the article about your Type-R that prompted you to buy it, it's a much cooler car than I thought.

I still maintain it's an odd replacement for an MX5. Agree with you about the steering though, only part of the car that I thought let it down.

ian_c_uk

1,245 posts

203 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
Really enjoyed my time with an ND2 2.0 RF, it benefitted from Eibach springs but otherwise stock (unless you count adding carplay).

As said, if you want a new car, these are a dying breed - enjoy them while you can.

I replaced mine with an EV..... and a turbocharged Mk1. Like the NC500 poster earlier, I often see exotica and think "right now, on this road, I wouldn't swap".


jhonn

1,567 posts

149 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
A lot of folks comment on how much they dislike the electric steering on the ND - inert, dead around the centre, no feedback, etc.

Having owned mine for 5+ years now I don't have an issue with it, it seems light (but not overly) and accurate. I fitted slightly narrower tyres on 16" rims to mine which may have affected it (for the better?).

Anyways... it's more likely due to the fact that this is the only sports car I've ever owned or driven any distance, and it's a lack of experience of what a proper sports car steering could be like. Also, I'm not a driving God and don't really know any better. biggrin

Don't let it put you off, if you're planning trying one.

horsemeatscandal

1,240 posts

104 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
GeniusOfLove said:
I was a bit rude, apologies hehe I went and found the article about your Type-R that prompted you to buy it, it's a much cooler car than I thought.

I still maintain it's an odd replacement for an MX5. Agree with you about the steering though, only part of the car that I thought let it down.
I accept that it's an odd replacement, haha. I don't really have any specific requirements for a car and fancied some interesting JDM metal before the prices go too crazy.

Anyway, back to the MX5. I do remember the adaptive matrix headlights (or whatever) being bloody brilliant, but it's the only car I've ever driven with them so maybe that's just what they're like.

bobj42

28 posts

11 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
I might buy one if I could fit in the cabin.

I've owned a mk3 in the past and fit in that just fine.

edo111s

217 posts

225 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
highway said:
PH regularly run articles about how great BBR conversions are. My car had their conversion. I was unimpressed.
My ND2 got their super 200 upgrade along with exhaust and centre section .
Very happy with it, did not change the character just made it a bit more oomphy !

Edited by edo111s on Wednesday 27th March 14:19

V8V Quadcamboy

118 posts

23 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
For steering feel, 30 or 50mm drop and add much castor as you like makes all the difference.

Decat and a map too, over 5800 rpm you think you've got full throttle but ECU says no

horsemeatscandal

1,240 posts

104 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
V8V Quadcamboy said:
For steering feel, 30 or 50mm drop and add much castor as you like makes all the difference.
Did both of these things. Eibachs and "fast road" alignment. Still ste. Also, the alignment on mine seemed to be knocked out of kilter at the mere suggestion of a road imperfection.

simongrif2010

14 posts

122 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
We had a 1.5l RF and loved it. Balanced responsive and everything you need, nothing you don’t. Driving a Porsche 987 spyder now, yes it’s faster but not enormously much more fun. We’ll miss the mx-5 when it’s gone for sure.

Bartimaeus

2 posts

1 month

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
The PH comments section never disappoints with all the bench racers and spec sheet warriors complaining about 0-60 times or turbos or the leathers and plastics on the dashboard or whatever else.
It's pretty simple though- this is one of the last, and one of the purest sports cars that will ever be made. Who cares about how fast it is as long as it is fun and *relatively* affordable. Pure classic roadster on a bespoke platform, with a wonderful NA engine, manual gearbox, and around 1050 kgs soaking wet. 20 years from now we'll be getting teary-eyed about these.

You either understand what it's about by this point, or you never really will.

GeniusOfLove

1,351 posts

12 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
Bartimaeus said:
The PH comments section never disappoints with all the bench racers and spec sheet warriors complaining about 0-60 times or turbos or the leathers and plastics on the dashboard or whatever else.
It's pretty simple though- this is one of the last, and one of the purest sports cars that will ever be made. Who cares about how fast it is as long as it is fun and *relatively* affordable. Pure classic roadster on a bespoke platform, with a wonderful NA engine, manual gearbox, and around 1050 kgs soaking wet. 20 years from now we'll be getting teary-eyed about these.

You either understand what it's about by this point, or you never really will.
clap

mcdonaa

46 posts

123 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
Bartimaeus said:
The PH comments section never disappoints with all the bench racers and spec sheet warriors complaining about 0-60 times or turbos or the leathers and plastics on the dashboard or whatever else.
It's pretty simple though- this is one of the last, and one of the purest sports cars that will ever be made. Who cares about how fast it is as long as it is fun and *relatively* affordable. Pure classic roadster on a bespoke platform, with a wonderful NA engine, manual gearbox, and around 1050 kgs soaking wet. 20 years from now we'll be getting teary-eyed about these.

You either understand what it's about by this point, or you never really will.
Precisely this. They in all likelyhood have never been in an ND, let alone driven one.

I've had mine now as a 'daily' for a few months - and its got to be one of the funnest, easiest to live with cars I've had. Heated seats, climate, carplay/android auto etc. I use it to commute, go to the shops, and have some early Sunday morning fun too. It does it all. Yes - as many on this thread have said, its not the fastest thing on the planet. Are all those same people saying the Elise is rubbish too because it only originally had 118bhp?

The ND is about 1000kg, which is unheard of these days - and you can really feel it. I have the 1.5 RF - and drove the 2.0L (184bhp) too to decide - and I chose the 1.5 - as its absolutely hilarious hammering it. It loves to rev, and the bonus is you don't have to be doing insane speeds to enjoy it, unlike the 400bhp hot hatches etc.

The RF roof is excellent too, and doesnt add much weight at all over the ragtop (about 50Kg)....but certainly improves the hood up feel and comfort.

Its mad that its only ever so slightly heavier than the original '89 NA....and lighter than both the NB and NC.

The only negative is that at just under 6 foot, I *only* just fit. Try before you buy....


Muzzman

187 posts

113 months

Wednesday 27th March
quotequote all
Have they strengthened the gearbox?

My mate sold his mk8 Fiesta ST and bought a two year old ND, he drove to the Nurburgring and pootled round that, about a month later went to Snetterton, got to 3pm and the gearbox was making a hell of a racket. Turned out it had stripped some teeth off third gear.

Took it to an MX5 specialist and he said not to track these, get an NC if you want to track an MX5. You can strengthen the gearbox but it's not cheap. The car was promptly sold and an 8.5 ST bought.

My mate loved the car though for daily driving.