RE: Porsche Cayenne S | Shed of the Week

RE: Porsche Cayenne S | Shed of the Week

Author
Discussion

greenarrow

3,600 posts

118 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
Stuff like this for me is the personification of the spirit of SOTW. Something that cost the earth new and now could bankrupt you and is almost being given away but provides so much metal for your money. Wow, what a car. Also love the advert, with its "do you feel lucky" vibes. Better to be tongue in cheek with a car like this than promise the world....

A work colleague had this exact model and gave him very good service during the 2 years I worked with him when he had the car. No, its not a turbo and not that fast, but I suspect the feel good factor driving one will compensate for that. Bravo Shed.

georgeyboy12345

3,521 posts

36 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
Rumblestripe said:
Horrid ugly things that devalue the brand.

When new they were a brash statement of something (wealth + taste, absence of), now they are cheap disposable tat with a whiff of desperation
My thoughts exactly

Baddie

617 posts

218 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
GeniusOfLove said:
Buy the turbo or don't bother.

The fuel in to performance out ratio on these old mid powered V8 elephants is pathetic, you're getting V12 supercar economy for very uninspiring performance, and in day to day use the turbo will use very little more fuel but have the performance there if you want it.
IIRC the turbo didn’t have the bore wear issue either.

Baileyk

197 posts

65 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
Tempted to buy one as the cheapest point of entry into Porsche ownership - minus the running costs and potential repair bills!

TikTak

1,587 posts

20 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
That is a hell of a lot of car for the money. What a bargain.

First servicing bill might cost you more though. It's also hideous.


sinbaddio

2,375 posts

177 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
I've got a 2005 Turbo.

And it's ace, been well maintained, hasn't had any issues (touch wood) and goes like stink. It's has a remap to around 525bhp.

Downside is mpg at around 13 - but I don't do many miles so I can live with that.

jbrisley

32 posts

134 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
Can any 2000's infotainment nerds confirm if the Siemens unit in the Cayenne is near enough identical to the same 'ICS' unit used in the Alfa 166? They look incredibly similar!

martin12345

607 posts

90 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
Where/when does a Shed become a Brave Pill and vice versa ?

For me this is a Brave Pill whereas a Shed is something more modest with low running costs that you run into the ground over a number of years spending nearly nothing.

Just a thought



As to the car, not my kind of thing in any way; big, SUV, ugly but each to their own

PSB1967

282 posts

157 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
martin12345 said:
Where/when does a Shed become a Brave Pill and vice versa ?

For me this is a Brave Pill whereas a Shed is something more modest with low running costs that you run into the ground over a number of years spending nearly nothing.

Just a thought



As to the car, not my kind of thing in any way; big, SUV, ugly but each to their own
I think PH towers are listening to their flock. Many of us loved brave Pill. There's been a few Shed-Brave Pill offerings recently.

Jeremy-57bxb

100 posts

67 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
Love the last three sentences. Classic Shed!

I have no love for these (or any SUV), but on a Porsche factory tour (Stuttgart and Leipzig) some 20 years ago I did have fun on the off-road circuit in one. The German instructions were to not go fast in the water-splash, but something got lost in translation, and we soon had a bow wave up and over the bonnet. The engine faltered briefly but pulled through and was still running when we left the car (thank god!).

TEKNOPUG

18,971 posts

206 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
GeniusOfLove said:
Buy the turbo or don't bother.

The fuel in to performance out ratio on these old mid powered V8 elephants is pathetic, you're getting V12 supercar economy for very uninspiring performance, and in day to day use the turbo will use very little more fuel but have the performance there if you want it.
You aren't getting a turbo though for £2k and you're into a whole different world of complexity and running costs.

It's a 2.2tonne SUV, with a low-range box, locking diff and a V8. You're supposed to just woofle about on the torque. It's not trying to be a performance car. You bought the wrong car if you were expecting otherwise. Still has enough oomph to overtake and make progress. Unlike the lesser engined models.

Wren-went

798 posts

39 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
Never liked 1st generation Cayenne for years they were built in a VW plant along with Touraeg only thing built and made in Stuttgart was the Engine.

A 2 grand Cayenne anyone buying it needs treatment .

Rusty Old-Banger

3,854 posts

214 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
PSB1967 said:
martin12345 said:
Where/when does a Shed become a Brave Pill and vice versa ?

For me this is a Brave Pill whereas a Shed is something more modest with low running costs that you run into the ground over a number of years spending nearly nothing.

Just a thought



As to the car, not my kind of thing in any way; big, SUV, ugly but each to their own
I think PH towers are listening to their flock. Many of us loved brave Pill. There's been a few Shed-Brave Pill offerings recently.
I think as the years pass, and the sheddy cars get more technologically "modern", the shed/brave pill crossover will become greater.

As someone above mentioned, an RX400h would be within this price point, so would qualify as a shed - but also, being a big hybrid, and very much computer-controlled, the potential for expensive parts is greater.

I think there will come a time when a genuine shed (that is NOT a brave pill) will be some sort of barn-find, low-mileage, old-school, common rail VAG 1.9TDi from the late 90s!

ChocolateFrog

25,454 posts

174 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
Over 7s to 60 sounds glacial for a fast SUV these days.

Can't imagine the fuel bills won't start to grate, slower than my diesel Touareg.

ChocolateFrog

25,454 posts

174 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
GeniusOfLove said:
Buy the turbo or don't bother.

The fuel in to performance out ratio on these old mid powered V8 elephants is pathetic, you're getting V12 supercar economy for very uninspiring performance, and in day to day use the turbo will use very little more fuel but have the performance there if you want it.
That's exactly what I was thinking.

GeniusOfLove

1,381 posts

13 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
ChocolateFrog said:
Over 7s to 60 sounds glacial for a fast SUV these days.

Can't imagine the fuel bills won't start to grate, slower than my diesel Touareg.
There is a good reason the mid performance petrol ones just vanished as soon as diesels got any good.

I just don't really see the point in this and other mid range models of the same ilk; if you are doing real miles and can afford to fuel it you can afford a better/faster car, if you don't want to go very far and it's a toy then it's too slow and st to be any actual fun, I could go on.

I do, however, see the point in a turbo version. If you're going to dick around with a ticking timebomb old smoker at least get a decent payoff for your risk, or bottle it completely and get the little six cylinder one.

Blackpuddin

16,552 posts

206 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
GeniusOfLove said:
ChocolateFrog said:
Over 7s to 60 sounds glacial for a fast SUV these days.

Can't imagine the fuel bills won't start to grate, slower than my diesel Touareg.
There is a good reason the mid performance petrol ones just vanished as soon as diesels got any good.

I just don't really see the point in this
V8 party

GeniusOfLove

1,381 posts

13 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
Blackpuddin said:
V8 party
As filthy as it sounds to say it... the diesel V8s lots of big SUVs came with can sound fantastic too.

TEKNOPUG

18,971 posts

206 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
ChocolateFrog said:
Over 7s to 60 sounds glacial for a fast SUV these days.

Can't imagine the fuel bills won't start to grate, slower than my diesel Touareg.
I expect one in fine fettle will be under 7s. Its the same power to weight as an Impreza WRX. Obviously it has a lot of initial inertia to overcome. But who is using one at traffic light grand prixs anway? 300+ lbs/ft is plenty of shove once moving.

Blackpuddin

16,552 posts

206 months

Friday 19th April
quotequote all
GeniusOfLove said:
Blackpuddin said:
V8 party
As filthy as it sounds to say it... the diesel V8s lots of big SUVs came with can sound fantastic too.
Oh aye, I'd happily take either.