RE: 816hp for new Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E Performance

RE: 816hp for new Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E Performance

Saturday 20th April

816hp for new Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E Performance

New plug-in hybrid variant debuts with more outright power than previous AMG GT Black Series


By now you’re likely familiar with the designation Mercedes-AMG uses for its flagship plug-in hybrid variants. E Performance means much the same thing to the GT 63 S that it meant to the four-door model last year: yet more power courtesy of a rear-mounted electric motor, with precious little attention paid to trivialities like usable zero-emission range. With 816hp, the coupe plays second fiddle to its big brother in terms of output, but its smaller size means it is very marginally quicker to 62mph. And 2.8 seconds makes it the fastest accelerating series production AMG ever. 

The question of whether or not the V8-powered GT (which is capable of getting to 62mph in 3.2 seconds in non-hybrid format) precisely needs this additional oomph is rather beside the point. Electrification is both a means and an end in Mercedes-AMG’s playbook, and if the presence of an electric motor and a pocket-sized battery continues to ensure the viability of its 4.0-litre bunkmate, then who are we to argue? Sure, we’d have preferred UK access to the 431hp rear-drive GT 43 that Mercedes revealed in Europe last month - but that wasn’t to be. We’ll just have to make do with up to 1,047lb ft of torque instead. 

In terms of configuration, the new AMG GT 63 S E Performance is much as you’d expect: the V8 and its nine-speed MCT are positioned over the front wheels, producing 612hp (slightly more than in the 585hp regular version) with a 204hp motor at the back as part of the carried over AMG Electric Drive Unit. This incorporates a two-speed transmission and a mechanical limited-slip differential, and is responsible for providing extra boost when moving off, accelerating or overtaking - or, as Mercedes-AMG puts it, ‘always available when the driver needs it’. It is aided in this regard by its high-density battery, which features 560 individually cooled cells for the kind of optimum temperature that allows it to recuperate energy far more efficiently than normal. 

It is clever stuff, partly inspired by F1 tech - although probably it helps if you plug the thing in occasionally. Mercedes doesn’t specify a charging time, but with a capacity of 6.1 kWh and a 3.7 kW onboard charger, it’s safe to say not very long. It’s this level of packaging convenience that accounts for the measly eight-mile range if you insist on driving the E Performance in purely electric mode. But that’s not really what the car is about. Mercedes-AMG envisages you driving in a way that takes full advantage of both power sources. 

As you might expect, the flagship GT 63 gets the full suite of chassis gizmos to ensure this is plausible. Larger ceramic brakes and active rear-axle steering are standard, so too AMG Active Ride Control which includes an anti-roll system that hydraulically links all four adaptive dampers. The 4Matic+ all-wheel-drive system is fully variable (including the ability to send electric output to the front axle) and while the E Performance is inevitably heavier than its V8-powered sibling, its maker reckons the positioning of the EDU at the back, along with its independent battery, improves the car’s overall weight distribution. 

Besides the E Performance badges and red highlights, the plug-in hybrid version is distinguished by the socket flap at the back and a different tailpipe design. The active aero elements, including the extendable rear spoiler, are carried over, as is the 2+2 interior - albeit with a host of hybrid-specific displays for the MBUX infotainment system. The car’s world debut occurred on the sidelines of the F1 weekend in Shanghai; no word yet on price or availability, but with the conventional GT 63 starting at £164,765 and the four-door E Performance we drove last year at £178,800, you’d imagine getting very little change from £200k. We’ll know for sure in the coming weeks.


Author
Discussion

BlackTank

Original Poster:

111 posts

144 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
The price is astronomical for what it is but I like the design. Problem is that for 200K I think I'd go for something more special like a Ferrari Roma.

Jermy Claxon

2,989 posts

140 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
Stripclub interior, ugly plug-in bumflap, and generally gloopy styling of the current Merc era. Not one for my fantasy garage.

btdk5

1,853 posts

191 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
They desperately need to integrate that centre screen.

ChrisCh86

855 posts

45 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
These are very heavy apparently, significantly heavier than the AMG GT. This will be even heavier with the battery pack and the hybrid assembly.

I think I'd rather have it's predecessor!

Robertb

1,463 posts

239 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
At first glance I honestly thought that was a 911!

pheonix478

1,332 posts

39 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
2569kg
GTFO
rofl

Skaben

175 posts

142 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
That flap on only one side at the back would irk me.

Julian Thompson

2,549 posts

239 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
pheonix478 said:
2569kg
GTFO
rofl
Crack pipe…..

I’ll stick with my SLS thanks hehe

fflump

1,387 posts

39 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
btdk5 said:
They desperately need to integrate that centre screen.
£200k and they have a large iPad propped up between the aircon vents.

As for the rest of the interior-someone at MB has some serious nostalgia for 80's night clubs.

NIgt3

614 posts

175 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
Robertb said:
At first glance I honestly thought that was a 911!
SNAP!!! And the more i look at it, the more it looks like a 911!!

swisstoni

17,042 posts

280 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
Merc have got so many models and styles on the go that they don’t seem to be a able to keep all plates spinning, styling wise.

This plate is looking very wobbly these days.

fflump

1,387 posts

39 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
Merc have got so many models and styles on the go that they don’t seem to be a able to keep all plates spinning, styling wise.

This plate is looking very wobbly these days.
Yes there is a real lack of design DNA flowing across the models. Debadge that and de-grill that car and you really would have no idea it was a Mercedes.

Magikarp

785 posts

49 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
I really like that, especially in that colour.

andy43

9,731 posts

255 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
Jermy Claxon said:
Stripclub interior, ugly plug-in bumflap, and generally gloopy styling of the current Merc era. Not one for my fantasy garage.
Gloopy. That’s the word I was looking for.
2.5 tonnes rofl

jonosterman

77 posts

93 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
pheonix478 said:
2569kg
GTFO
rofl
Isn't that the weight of the 4-door?

EyeHeartSpellin

668 posts

84 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
I personally love the look of these outside but I can’t for the life of me get my head round it being £200k. I know everything is expensive now but if someone turned up in one of these I would really admire it and think an absolute top spec one was £120k max and even then think I might get something a little more visceral.

SmithCorona

617 posts

30 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
The rear is fantastic, but the rest is meh. The inside looks like a bottle of matey bubble bath!

SLS, a 20k bork fund, and 50k change for me.

Glenn63

2,786 posts

85 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
SmithCorona said:
The rear is fantastic, but the rest is meh. The inside looks like a bottle of matey bubble bath!

SLS, a 20k bork fund, and 50k change for me.
Absolutely, i think the SLS still looks fantastic and a proper old school AMG V8. A whole lot of meh for this from me, so many more options for the price.

911Spanker

1,239 posts

17 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
Not sure about the opening asshole.

ColdoRS

1,806 posts

128 months

Saturday 20th April
quotequote all
fflump said:
swisstoni said:
Merc have got so many models and styles on the go that they don’t seem to be a able to keep all plates spinning, styling wise.

This plate is looking very wobbly these days.
Yes there is a real lack of design DNA flowing across the models. Debadge that and de-grill that car and you really would have no idea it was a Mercedes.
You say that like it's a bad thing; do all cars from one manufacturer have to look the same from the front?
I'm all for each model in a lineup doing it's own thing, to some extent.