RE: MG Cyberster goes on sale priced from £55k

RE: MG Cyberster goes on sale priced from £55k

Author
Discussion

Silvanus

5,259 posts

24 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
JJJ. said:
J4CKO said:
If you care about weight, you won’t buy it, if you aren’t, then you might.

People buy massive diesel and petrol SUVs and they probably know they are quite heavy but not how much.

People buy SLs and stuff, they don’t get the scales out and check its weight.

Does it look cool, is it shiny, is it fast, how much does it cost to buy, and run, will it get me a shag ?

They aren’t agonising over its weight by and large, like people buy audio equipment that would offend audiophiles but they think is awesome.

You aren’t dealing with the enthusiasts by and large.

Watched the TG video, looks alright, not particularly on my next car list but it’s got some appeal.

Would love someone to produce a light EV sports car in the future, this isn’t that yet, it is more a cruiser than a back roads weapon.

It is, despite all the moaning, evidence that there may be more interesting EVs coming, fair play to MG they are the first and it’s a credible looking effort.
''You aren’t dealing with the enthusiasts by and large.''

This.

I suspect any enthusiast when looking to buy a sports car or a GT will go ICE and take all the vehicle's parameters and specification into consideration when making a choice. While going EV they're on the back foot straight off as they'd stuck with a major weight penalty, no gearbox and of course no engine, which many would consider the beating heart of such a car.
Admittedly, I understand EV's have their place as tool but can't get my head around any enthusiast buying one as a sports car or GT.
When a company designs a car that only appeals to enthusiasts, they sell about 3.

GTRene

16,603 posts

225 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
Rob747 said:
Trophy 2110kg
GT 2210kg

From the MG configurator
yikes
wow, heavy weight, it looks good-ish though.

I believe in the future they want cars to weight maxima 1.000kg thats good news for drivers, thats maybe? one good point of the bad WEF/VN but I guess there are hidden doors also in that 'trap'

NDNDNDND

2,024 posts

184 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
ChocolateFrog said:
otolith said:
NDNDNDND said:
otolith said:
Agree with that, the engine in the mk2 MX-5 was a joyless thing.
I dunno, I quite like the engine in my Mk1 - stainless exhaust, K&N filter, lightened flywheel, snappy gearshift and the shorter final drive ratio from the imported cars means the engine's definitely a part of the fun.
I liked the car. I thought the engine was the weak point. Coarse, thrashy, needed revs for all the power but didn't feel like it liked it.
And gets 30mpg if you're lucky for all that mighty 130hp.

I thought the engine was comfortably the worst bit about my MX5.

ETA and the block weighs a ton, took 2 of us to lift it out.
The final drive ratio makes a big difference - UK cars came with the 3.9:1 ratio, whereas the Eunos, like mine, came with the 4.1:1 ratio with the 1.8. You'll often hear people say the 1.6 has the 'better engine' when in reality is the difference is the 4.3:1 ratio it used to compensate for the lack of torque. The 1.8 was available in Japan with the 4.3:1 ratio in the R Ltd. and RS Ltd., and I did once have a go in a R Ltd which was keen as a terrier - it also had an ARC magic chamber which gave it an almost carb-like induction bark.

The problem with the engine is that's a perfectly reasonable late-80's hot hatch engine, but it's completely outshone by the chassis, which could take a lot more. As for weight, well it was a cast iron block and designed to be turbocharged, which is why the engine can be safely boosted to twice the standard output without any internal changes.

Funnily enough I thought the worst part of the car was the steering, which was horribly over-boosted and disappointingly numb - heresy, I know. Depowering the rack made a huge difference - it also had a surprising impact on the engine, which rev'd a lot more freely without the parasitic drag from the pump. Fuel economy also jumped up to 36+mpg.

sideways man

1,320 posts

138 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
The name is a bit rubbish but what a good looking thing. Being average dynamically hasn’t done the Z4 any harm.
At that proposed price I’d say they will sell as fast as they can make ‘em.

JJJ.

1,285 posts

16 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
Silvanus said:
JJJ. said:
J4CKO said:
If you care about weight, you won’t buy it, if you aren’t, then you might.

People buy massive diesel and petrol SUVs and they probably know they are quite heavy but not how much.

People buy SLs and stuff, they don’t get the scales out and check its weight.

Does it look cool, is it shiny, is it fast, how much does it cost to buy, and run, will it get me a shag ?

They aren’t agonising over its weight by and large, like people buy audio equipment that would offend audiophiles but they think is awesome.

You aren’t dealing with the enthusiasts by and large.

Watched the TG video, looks alright, not particularly on my next car list but it’s got some appeal.

Would love someone to produce a light EV sports car in the future, this isn’t that yet, it is more a cruiser than a back roads weapon.

It is, despite all the moaning, evidence that there may be more interesting EVs coming, fair play to MG they are the first and it’s a credible looking effort.
''You aren’t dealing with the enthusiasts by and large.''

This.

I suspect any enthusiast when looking to buy a sports car or a GT will go ICE and take all the vehicle's parameters and specification into consideration when making a choice. While going EV they're on the back foot straight off as they'd stuck with a major weight penalty, no gearbox and of course no engine, which many would consider the beating heart of such a car.
Admittedly, I understand EV's have their place as tool but can't get my head around any enthusiast buying one as a sports car or GT.
When a company designs a car that only appeals to enthusiasts, they sell about 3.
Really? I think Porsche, Ferrari, Toyota, Mazda etc would disagree with you.
And did anybody say ''only'' enthusiasts can buy a car that appeals to enthusiasts?


carlo996

5,757 posts

22 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
Silvanus said:
When a company designs a car that only appeals to enthusiasts, they sell about 3.
Yeah, that's BS.

Silvanus

5,259 posts

24 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
JJJ. said:
Silvanus said:
JJJ. said:
J4CKO said:
If you care about weight, you won’t buy it, if you aren’t, then you might.

People buy massive diesel and petrol SUVs and they probably know they are quite heavy but not how much.

People buy SLs and stuff, they don’t get the scales out and check its weight.

Does it look cool, is it shiny, is it fast, how much does it cost to buy, and run, will it get me a shag ?

They aren’t agonising over its weight by and large, like people buy audio equipment that would offend audiophiles but they think is awesome.

You aren’t dealing with the enthusiasts by and large.

Watched the TG video, looks alright, not particularly on my next car list but it’s got some appeal.

Would love someone to produce a light EV sports car in the future, this isn’t that yet, it is more a cruiser than a back roads weapon.

It is, despite all the moaning, evidence that there may be more interesting EVs coming, fair play to MG they are the first and it’s a credible looking effort.
''You aren’t dealing with the enthusiasts by and large.''

This.

I suspect any enthusiast when looking to buy a sports car or a GT will go ICE and take all the vehicle's parameters and specification into consideration when making a choice. While going EV they're on the back foot straight off as they'd stuck with a major weight penalty, no gearbox and of course no engine, which many would consider the beating heart of such a car.
Admittedly, I understand EV's have their place as tool but can't get my head around any enthusiast buying one as a sports car or GT.
When a company designs a car that only appeals to enthusiasts, they sell about 3.
Really? I think Porsche, Ferrari, Toyota, Mazda etc would disagree with you.
And did anybody say ''only'' enthusiasts can buy a car that appeals to enthusiasts?
Nobody said that, and neither did I. My point was a car needs to appeal to to various different buyers if you want to sell lots. Driving enthusiasts are a very small proportion of overall car buyers.

EV8

43 posts

4 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
NO LARD said:
Sycamore said:
Batteries are heavy.
If it was lighter, you'd complain about the range instead.
Making assumptions about what I'd "complain" about is pretty foolish.

I JUST WANTED TO KNOW HOW MUCH IT WEIGHS
MAYBE YOU SHOULD GOOGLE IT!

EV8

43 posts

4 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
W12AAM said:
Chinese built; Fully Electric, stupid doors....and about £20k too much - No thanks; And that's from an MG fan.
They should have aimed more at an MX5 equivalent, as MG are not a premier brand. They should have made it all petrol...Or hybrid - But NOT fully electric. Those doors, i dont like - Look like something some "oik" would do to his hot-hatch
A nice 2nd hand F-Type or Boxter, for 1/2 the price would be my preferred choice.
The Chinese just don't understand the brand they've bought / "Stolen" from us.
This is a 2seat convertible, not exactly "under the radar" car. So lambo doors, why not. Adds to the drama. And by beng electric, in the long term it actually costs 20k less as ICE.
Comparing 2nd hand cars... Really.
Stolen brand? Huh, seriously? Maybe you should buy more MGs, so it wouldnt go bust. I see it as a saviour. And the bad, bad Chinese obviously understand the brand better then you superior british people...

Honeywell

1,381 posts

99 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
I like it if it's £500 a month on EV salary sacrifice because that will help swerve me paying the 62% tax band, I have a 184bhp MX5 mk4 for fun and a BMW 840d mostly for commuting 50 miles to work.

If I had a Cyberster it would replace the BMW. That would free up the MX5 slot for a GR Yaris or maybe something left field like a Bentley Mulsanne as the silly car that only does 3000 miles a year.

So I see the Cyberster as a disrupter, which is a good thing, because it gives options that didn't exist before. It's a blend of attributes previously unavailable.

I wouldn't consider it if the tax factor of the salary sacrifice leasing didn't exist, but it does exist. It is at least an 'interesting' car so as such should be celebrated here.

Lil_Red_GTV

671 posts

144 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
Encouraging that Tom Ford said he didn't really miss the noise. Looks like it would be fun to punt down a country road on a sunny day.

It's a pity the European legacy manufacturers have been beaten to it, but kudos to the Chinese for making an EV that celebrates driving as a fun activity and doesn't look like a suppository.

As for all the people saying "I'm a true enthusiast, though, so I'll choose ICE because weight/noise". Great. Enjoy your classics. That's won't be a viable choice for a new car soon, though, because climate change.

Cornish Pete

71 posts

88 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
Saw this at Goodwood last year. Fabulous looking thing. However price and the fact it's electric makes it a big fat no for me. Maybe when it's £25k and the charging network is a bit better I may take a look.

pacdes

495 posts

162 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
NO LARD said:
Sycamore said:
Batteries are heavy.
If it was lighter, you'd complain about the range instead.
Making assumptions about what I'd "complain" about is pretty foolish.

I JUST WANTED TO KNOW HOW MUCH IT WEIGHS
It would really depend on how many LARD-arses are sitting in it.

garystoybox

782 posts

118 months

Thursday 25th April
quotequote all
fatsams said:
With many manufacturers stopping/suspending electric car manufacturing, why is it electric?
Eh? Which companies would that be. Apart from broke Aston who hasn’t the resources to do a clean sheet EV, I’m not aware of any other?

Marcodude

57 posts

127 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
Meh!

It's not a particularly good looking thing. The fixtures and finish will be cheap going by the MG X power. Thirdly, it's a MG... A hard pass from me

DaveEvs

283 posts

103 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
I’m seeing a hint of the 80’s concept car MG E-XE in the dash.

(Goes to Google hoping to find a vertical CD player and graphic equaliser)

ColdoRS

1,806 posts

128 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
I'm conflicted. I am a fan of EVs and I want the manufacturers to work out EV sports cars and make them a viable option, however.... this screams Chinesium and MGs in general have never really got me excited; they're for middle aged women and old men in my eyes.

That said, I hope it's good and I hope it sells well to fuel this sector of the market, I just can't see me being a customer.

N.A.R.T Spyder

50 posts

61 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
I saw one of these recently at the Classic and Restoration show at the NEC. A very nice looking car and up close the build quality seems to be spot on. The one they had on display was locked so I didn't realise they had scissor doors which is a bit unnecessary in my opinion.

Arsecati

2,317 posts

118 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
NO LARD said:
Well, I care - amongst many other things, I've owned more than 10 Lotus, most of them weighed well under a tonne, and none of them weighed more than 1200kg...
And they all had over 500bhp? Wow, well done.

stuart100

480 posts

58 months

Friday 26th April
quotequote all
It’s Chinese. I’m too concerned about the car hacking my phone and stealing my data.