|
glazbagun
4,155 posts
66 months
|
I dont think too highly of Proton, but they seem to have done much better with Lotus than GM did. Although profitability kind of sucks, as I understand it. I would rather Jaguar/LR be bought out by a large mega-industry like Tata with no conflict of interests than a competitor like, say, BMW/Mercedes.
If it happens, it'll be interesting to see how Jags shape up against Prodrive Astons a decade from now.
|
|
|
Jimbeaux
25,725 posts
100 months
|
davey68 said: i wish tata and JLR well (used to work for JLR and have many friends still there) Good, maybe you can help them find another job when the honourable Tata sends them home. How long do you think it will take Indians, paid a fraction of their UK counterparts to "master" whatever skill it takes to build a Jaguar or Euro-quality car? If this occurs, do you believe they will continue to employ Brits simply to be "honourable"? Hopefully, they will understand that having them "built in Britain by Brits" will still mean something to those who buy the most Jags.....Yanks for one.
|
|
|
Jimbeaux
25,725 posts
100 months
|
Al 450 said: Turbobanana said: Wasn't there a tie-up with Mercedes and Tata? Seem to remember MB setting up the plant in India and the old Loadbeta / Ghurka crocks using 190E front wings... Yep they make the Merc C class in Pune India under licence. Tata own a mobile phone network, the airport you land at, all the power stations, the steelworks, the software company that write the programs all the PC's run on etc.... Massive is an understatement. Huge amounts of money which is sorely needed for the Jaguar moneypit. They are naieve as the Chinese firms are and still don't really understand how to design and assembly a car to western standards but that's partly the reason they would want Jaguar. Best in class processes and quality standards at Jag. This was once true of Japanese firms 20-30 years ago. As for the CityRover, no such thing as a bad car just an inappropriately priced one. In many ways it was streets ahead of the class, 4 doors, 30bhp more, very resilient car just wrongly priced. Guaranteed that anyone who slates it has never driven one just watched too many episodes of Top Gear. The processes and quality standards at Jag was instituted by Ford....that is what has brought them from the dark ages to third in world quality ratings. I agree that Chinese and some near Eastern companies are new to this, but surely they can hire a team to institute said quality programs from the west as opposed to buying a car company to show them how.
|
|
|
Jimbeaux
25,725 posts
100 months
|
dandarez said: What many on here seem to forget is 'we' are now the 3rd world country - none of this matters anymore.
There isn't an ounce of conscience, an ounce of trust, an ounce of justice, an ounce of care, an ounce of decency, an ounce of common sense the list is endless - we've lost the plot ...totally ...in EVERYTHING. You are now appointed to head the charm school, optimist's club, and the suicide prevention hotline.
|
|
|
XJSJohn
13,354 posts
88 months
|
Jimbeaux said: dandarez said: What many on here seem to forget is 'we' are now the 3rd world country - none of this matters anymore.
There isn't an ounce of conscience, an ounce of trust, an ounce of justice, an ounce of care, an ounce of decency, an ounce of common sense the list is endless - we've lost the plot ...totally ...in EVERYTHING. You are now appointed to head the charm school, optimist's club, and the suicide prevention hotline. May I say (speaking as a Brit that has departed the mother land to take up home in a former colony)    and sad but true. On the TATA buying JLR, I suspect that it will not be bad for the brand or the product (look at Lotus and Kia (gave us the Elan M100) and more recently Proton where the Elise would not have happened without that partnership, hardly a succession of prestige brands owning and funding) but I suspect that the JLR unions themselves may find that they themselves have made a mistake. It is rather ironic that all the former colonies and commonwealth countries are now in a position to buy up the top brand name industries and manufacturers of their former overlords. Indeed, the UK is fast approaching the status of 3rd world
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
threespires
959 posts
80 months
|
Nobody seems to question the quality of Mercedes and BMW's that are built in the USA using many workers new to the industry. Yet the quality of some US home grown cars make even the Cityrover look well made.
So if Tata were to transfer Jaguar production to India, [ which I doubt ] why shouldn't they be able to train workers in a new factory to built a quality car, just as MB & BMW have in the US?
But my guess would be that they will supply components to a UK facility. They stand to gain a lot from the UK design teams, experienced workforce, test facilities and the heritage. I'm sure Jaguars' 'Britishness' is a great attraction, particularly to the Indian market as it is in most of the world.
Another point is the gain in market share in India. As an Indian owned company, I'd imagine Jaguar have the opportunity to dramatically increase market share in a country that has a lot of wealth, as well as great poverty.
I'm positive about the TATA proposal, why they even sponser F1, could Jaguar perhaps get back into competition eventually ?
Bring it on TATA, good luck.
|
|
|
Marquis_Rex
7,377 posts
108 months
|
I can't believe the ignorant stupidity on some of these posts. Don't judge a company by the products they've released in a market in a different part of the world. In the same way, If Ford or GM wanted to, they could have easily released a technology lead very complicated, crafted vehicle for the American market if they wanted to, but did not- because it would be totally inappropriate and foolish. These kinds of companies totally understand, for instance, what makes say, an S54 BMW engine or a Porsche GT3 engine PHers so admire- as you can bet these are groups of very accomplished engineers stripping these kinds of engines down at at Ford Ressearch labs. It just wouldn't fit the market.
Tata are very very wealthy, they just bought another American company recently (Incat). In the same way, if they wanted to release what ever kind of car they thought they needed to, they could draw upon their rescources or pay consultancies. It's not through lack of ability. They also have honourable business practices. [Quite often, cars such as those from Korea don't have engines developed by themselves at all, but totally developed by consultancies-who only the week before were working on some high technology German project- it's no different here) The biggest issue could be the same as was faced by BMW with Rover: BMW looked up to Rover too much, probably because of Pischetschrieders ignorance to the Anglo-American top-heavy management style. Therefore they did little to change them and just pumped in more and more cash until it was too late. Despite all the posts from the blind patriots to the contrary- they had the best of intensions. In the same way, Indians sometimes still look up to England and may be tempted to leave alot as is. In a top heavy company, with managers empire building and leeching off like parasites contributing absolutely NOTHING this is folley. The other potential issue could be if they don't understand the market-which in this segment is as much to do with emotion, image and herritage as function. They'll have a much longer term view than any London City Fat cat financial concern. What they need is an overpaid hatchet man to get rid of the parasites with no agenda. Someone who's worked there before....
|
|
|
900T-R
18,560 posts
126 months
|
Marquis_Rex said: I can't believe the ignorant stupidity on some of these posts. Don't judge a company by the products they've released in a market in a different part of the world. In the same way, If Ford or GM wanted to, they could have easily released a technology lead very complicated, crafted vehicle for the American market if they wanted to, but did not- because it would be totally inappropriate and foolish. These kinds of companies totally understand, for instance, what makes say, an S54 BMW engine or a Porsche GT3 engine PHers so admire- as you can bet these are groups of very accomplished engineers stripping these kinds of engines down at at Ford Ressearch labs. It just wouldn't fit the market. Granted, but in particular GMs downfall is their failure to understand that this level of technological sophistication is mandatory to succeed in the European market as opposed to their home market. Saab was a technology leader in the early/mid '80s and as such on one plane with BMW, Mercedes and Jaguar - GM thinks that Opel/Vauxhall bits with a few superficial tweaks will do and look where the brand is now. At the same time, fourty highly paid heavyweights from the Dutch automotive world are heading Cadillac from one European marketing disaster into the next because Detroit thinks of it as a global premium brand...
|
|
|
Podie
38,414 posts
144 months
|
Marquis_Rex said: I can't believe the ignorant stupidity on some of these posts. Then again fella, you work in the industry, so like me, you've seen it. Trouble is, the "comics" in the news stands show a very different view to the public. Then again, if you believe and AutoExpress "scoop" you'll believe anything.. 
|
|
|
gary11
3,437 posts
70 months
|
Podie said: Marquis_Rex said: I can't believe the ignorant stupidity on some of these posts. Then again fella, you work in the industry, so like me, you've seen it. Trouble is, the "comics" in the news stands show a very different view to the public. Then again, if you believe and AutoExpress "scoop" you'll believe anything..  You may feel some of the comments are ignorant and ill iformed,but what some people dont realise is this isnt about uber iteligent buisiness theory and psyco analysing the whys and wherefores of the east and how it will be better for us or the workforce or the consumer"look how well the indians have done or the chinese", what this is about is the good old fashioned gut feeling, its wrong to sell JLR to the indians, euro sector manufacturer maybe who knows?,I think if you held a vote on the subject the result would be steered by the masses via Clarckson,the sun.auto express ect like it or not, but same as the euro vote no one will get the chance...I think 85% against would be about right
|
|
|
Podie
38,414 posts
144 months
|
Fair point 
|
|
|
davey68
690 posts
106 months
|
Superb post Marquis_Rex! Obviously you have also worked at JLR and seen the inept upper tier of management in action. Ok in an ideal world maybe tata isnt the perfect fit, but look at the options on the table! Tata are as ive said an honourable company, with huge financial muscle. Restructuring? yes but they will not simply buy up JLR to learn how to build high quality cars in India and close it. I guess we will all have to watch this space and see what happens. Honestly, would some of you people prefer JLR sold to an asset stripping company or a direct competitor?
|
|
|
munk
117 posts
68 months
|
I personally believe that TATA is what is best for the brand- they have a hugely more diverse market than ford and therefore may be able to do something interesting with the jag- rather than producing high spec mondeos as per the present owner.
At the end of the day people, Jag is going down - there is no other way to explain this they'll be dumped if they don't sell its quite simple. If you have enough money to keep it in the UK please write them a cheque now, otherwise stop whinging and let TATA have a crack at it, they could be a good thing for Jaguar.
TATA produce some fantastic cars for the market in India, I suspect they'll do their homework and try to produce something for the western market. They've got my support.
Oh and before anyone gets on their 'Livid and Ill informed' racial slur bandwagon 'their not British, it's not right' just remember that India is probably more British than we are due to years of colonization and forced industrialization, and being honest they have a better and less obstinate workforce who are happy to do their jobs.. unlike some in the UK. Is it really a wonder than we have no motor industry left any longer?
|
|
|
Podie
38,414 posts
144 months
|
Anyone noticed that the G4 challenge has had a lot of events in India and the Sub-Continent in the last few years..?
|
|
|
gary11
3,437 posts
70 months
|
munk said: I personally believe that TATA is what is best for the brand- they have a hugely more diverse market than ford and therefore may be able to do something interesting with the jag- rather than producing high spec mondeos as per the present owner.
At the end of the day people, Jag is going down - there is no other way to explain this they'll be dumped if they don't sell its quite simple. If you have enough money to keep it in the UK please write them a cheque now, otherwise stop whinging and let TATA have a crack at it, they could be a good thing for Jaguar.
TATA produce some fantastic cars for the market in India, I suspect they'll do their homework and try to produce something for the western market. They've got my support.
Oh and before anyone gets on their 'Livid and Ill informed' racial slur bandwagon 'their not British, it's not right' just remember that India is probably more British than we are due to years of colonization and forced industrialization, and being honest they have a better and less obstinate workforce who are happy to do their jobs.. unlike some in the UK. Is it really a wonder than we have no motor industry left any longer? Fair shout,but dont you feel (its not racist its a british thing)if the indians or chinese own it it will be harder to sell the cars,I am a independant Jaguar dealer in my experiance in retailing used Jaguar (25yrs)it is difficult enogh to sell the "Ford ones" as the punters call them,though we all realise the last of the X300 was a superior car to X308 as traditionalists and enthusiasts liked the 6cyl car,this poor V8 is the reason XK8 are now selling for sub 10k what a car for that money far superior to the XJS based Db7 ,we still are suffering terrible depriciation on early X308 beacause of the engine,what a shame! the rest of the car is fine,s types have now found their own base of customers on spec as people now have accepeted them in their own right, I wont mention the X type/mondeo,its a shame they are not making moneyI am not saying I know the answers but put simply it is the Jaguar name we are talking about I dont see the Indian theme being viable in our showroom we will see.try not to think to much and moralise about the ethics ,we are all entitled to our opinion it is about the customers will they want it and buy it in their thousands? I think not, good luck Jaguar I think you are going to need it.IT CAN BE DONE LOOK AT THE MINI!
|
|
|
Podie
38,414 posts
144 months
|
Now I find this interesting. Anything pre-“Uncle Nick” basically means you need two of them to keep one on the road… so I wouldn’t touch anything before a P-reg…
The X-Type/Mondeo thing is one of those press things.. everyone uses common platforms. Why is it such a slur to have a Mondeo basis? Yet Audi/VAG can use the same bloody platform for everything an no-one bats an eye.
The Mini is an interesting point, I think the issue runs deeper than people think. The British like to bash their own stuff, and then moan about it, and go on about how things used to be. Amazing how people are perfectly happy to go and buy a German car, then stand and say how crap British cars are, or moan that it has the wrong badge on the front…
|
|
|
Jimbeaux
25,725 posts
100 months
|
900T-R said: Marquis_Rex said: I can't believe the ignorant stupidity on some of these posts. Don't judge a company by the products they've released in a market in a different part of the world. In the same way, If Ford or GM wanted to, they could have easily released a technology lead very complicated, crafted vehicle for the American market if they wanted to, but did not- because it would be totally inappropriate and foolish. These kinds of companies totally understand, for instance, what makes say, an S54 BMW engine or a Porsche GT3 engine PHers so admire- as you can bet these are groups of very accomplished engineers stripping these kinds of engines down at at Ford Ressearch labs. It just wouldn't fit the market. Granted, but in particular GMs downfall is their failure to understand that this level of technological sophistication is mandatory to succeed in the European market as opposed to their home market. Saab was a technology leader in the early/mid '80s and as such on one plane with BMW, Mercedes and Jaguar - GM thinks that Opel/Vauxhall bits with a few superficial tweaks will do and look where the brand is now. At the same time, fourty highly paid heavyweights from the Dutch automotive world are heading Cadillac from one European marketing disaster into the next because Detroit thinks of it as a global premium brand... GM's problems are that they had an old style uber-generous pension + everything plan for workers. They have recently addressed this through their historic shuffle with their unions....Ford will likely follow siut. The quality of their cars/trucks have not been better. Selling to the Euro-market, no offense, is not paramount to their success. It would be nice, but I beleieve the retooling price to "over-comlplicate" something to sell in Europe would not be worth the expense vs. the gain.
|
|
|
Podie
38,414 posts
144 months
|
Jimbeaux said: 900T-R said: Marquis_Rex said: I can't believe the ignorant stupidity on some of these posts. Don't judge a company by the products they've released in a market in a different part of the world. In the same way, If Ford or GM wanted to, they could have easily released a technology lead very complicated, crafted vehicle for the American market if they wanted to, but did not- because it would be totally inappropriate and foolish. These kinds of companies totally understand, for instance, what makes say, an S54 BMW engine or a Porsche GT3 engine PHers so admire- as you can bet these are groups of very accomplished engineers stripping these kinds of engines down at at Ford Ressearch labs. It just wouldn't fit the market. Granted, but in particular GMs downfall is their failure to understand that this level of technological sophistication is mandatory to succeed in the European market as opposed to their home market. Saab was a technology leader in the early/mid '80s and as such on one plane with BMW, Mercedes and Jaguar - GM thinks that Opel/Vauxhall bits with a few superficial tweaks will do and look where the brand is now. At the same time, fourty highly paid heavyweights from the Dutch automotive world are heading Cadillac from one European marketing disaster into the next because Detroit thinks of it as a global premium brand... GM's problems are that they had an old style uber-generous pension + everything plan for workers. They have recently addressed this through their historic shuffle with their unions....Ford will likely follow siut. The quality of their cars/trucks have not been better. Selling to the Euro-market, no offense, is not paramount to their success. It would be nice, but I beleieve the retooling price to "over-comlplicate" something to sell in Europe would not be worth the expense vs. the gain. Stateside I seem to recall that Ford have more pensioners on their books than workers...
|
|
|
Marquis_Rex
7,377 posts
108 months
|
gary11 said: ...I am a independant Jaguar dealer in my experiance in retailing used Jaguar (25yrs)it is difficult enogh to sell the "Ford ones" as the punters call them,though we all realise the last of the X300 was a superior car to X308 as traditionalists and enthusiasts liked the 6cyl car,this poor V8 is the reason XK8 are now selling for sub 10k what a car for that money far superior to the XJS based Db7 ,we still are suffering terrible depriciation on early X308 beacause of the engine,what a shame! the rest of the car is fine,s types have now found their own base of customers on spec as people now have accepeted them in their own right, I've misunderstood, perhaps you could clarify: Sorry, what is the criticism against the Jaguar V8 exactly? Is it that purely that enthusiasts prefer the old AJ16 to the AJ26/27 or are you inferring that they're unreliable due to Ford some how? The AJV8 is a solid engine, and whereever the money came from, it was engineered by Jaguar engineers such as myself. The AJ16 was also a fine and almost indestructable engine of course. The AJV6 is also a Jaguar engine, contrary to popular myth, the block is shared with the Ford Duratec (which Porsche engineering had alot of input in), but the valvetrain, crank pistons, - infact most of the engine was designed and engineered at Whitley for Jaguars. Any issues with the AJV8 are certainly well below par and no way worse than equivalents from BMW or Mercedes etc etc.
|
|
|
Jimbeaux
25,725 posts
100 months
|
Podie said: Jimbeaux said: 900T-R said: Marquis_Rex said: I can't believe the ignorant stupidity on some of these posts. Don't judge a company by the products they've released in a market in a different part of the world. In the same way, If Ford or GM wanted to, they could have easily released a technology lead very complicated, crafted vehicle for the American market if they wanted to, but did not- because it would be totally inappropriate and foolish. These kinds of companies totally understand, for instance, what makes say, an S54 BMW engine or a Porsche GT3 engine PHers so admire- as you can bet these are groups of very accomplished engineers stripping these kinds of engines down at at Ford Ressearch labs. It just wouldn't fit the market. Granted, but in particular GMs downfall is their failure to understand that this level of technological sophistication is mandatory to succeed in the European market as opposed to their home market. Saab was a technology leader in the early/mid '80s and as such on one plane with BMW, Mercedes and Jaguar - GM thinks that Opel/Vauxhall bits with a few superficial tweaks will do and look where the brand is now. At the same time, fourty highly paid heavyweights from the Dutch automotive world are heading Cadillac from one European marketing disaster into the next because Detroit thinks of it as a global premium brand... GM's problems are that they had an old style uber-generous pension + everything plan for workers. They have recently addressed this through their historic shuffle with their unions....Ford will likely follow siut. The quality of their cars/trucks have not been better. Selling to the Euro-market, no offense, is not paramount to their success. It would be nice, but I beleieve the retooling price to "over-comlplicate" something to sell in Europe would not be worth the expense vs. the gain. Stateside I seem to recall that Ford have more pensioners on their books than workers... Could very well be, they are a 100 year old company......GM, which grew larger later had the more "generous package".
|
|