RE: Porsche 911 GT2

Author
Discussion

Shropshiremike

23,243 posts

204 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
bobalog said:
A great car.


But... When you buy a car like that, i'd want it to feel special. And though, i'm sure it does I think a GT3 RS would feel more "special".
I'm not sure but having driven neither I won't argue! smile

Burba

1,868 posts

258 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
not sure you can compare the standard F430 to the GT2 as said in the article...?

sniff petrol

13,107 posts

213 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
kradzero said:
so nobody cares to point out that the 997 Turbo actually has 480bhp and not 450 as per review? the difference is not as great in terms of output, but had this power been given to the Turbo it would probably, and im only speculating, accelerate to 60mph a tenth or two faster than the current gt2 due to its 4wd. still, what an amazing car.
Was just going to post the same thing.

dinkel

26,959 posts

259 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
Gazboy said:
Burba said:
not sure you can compare the standard F430 to the GT2 as said in the article...?
Why not? Same money aren't they???
So?

ewenm

28,506 posts

246 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
dinkel said:
Gazboy said:
Burba said:
not sure you can compare the standard F430 to the GT2 as said in the article...?
Why not? Same money aren't they???
So?
So if you're in the market for a £130k car, you'll probably consider both...?

Adam B

27,260 posts

255 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
blindswelledrat said:
kradzero said:
but excitement aside, who'd take this over a carrera gt? smile
Someone with a budget of 130k as opposed to 300k.
But don't let semantics prevent you from trying to find fault with such a good car!!!
or indeed those saying they would prefer a £1m F1 !?!?!?

Magners P.H

6,631 posts

215 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
If I had the money to buy one (which I don't sadly frown ), as brilliant a car as the 997 GT2 is, I would personally be tempted by a 993 GT2




(the car pictured is currently for sale in the PH classifieds http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/416948.htm

Can't say I am keen on the 997 GT2's styling, can't point my finger as to why.

For me the 993 is a much better looking car.

And it's a classic, which for me is a big bonus.

Edited by Magners P.H on Friday 9th May 13:51

qube_TA

8,402 posts

246 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
Nice review, awesome car. Shame it looks too much like a regular Porsche though. These days where every other car is either a Porsche or a BMW if I was dropping £130K on a car I'd want something a little more exclusive looking.

Still credit where it's due, an awesome car.


RobM77

35,349 posts

235 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
Magners P.H said:
If I had the money to buy one (which I don't sadly frown ), as brilliant a car as the 997 GT2 is, I would personally be tempted by a 993 GT2

[pics removed to avoid clutter]

(the car pictured is currently for sale in the PH classifieds http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/416948.htm

Can't say I am keen on the 997 GT2's styling, can't point my finger as to why.

For me the 993 is a much better looking car.

And it's a classic, which for me is a big bonus.

Edited by Magners P.H on Friday 9th May 13:51
Blimey - £123k?! For that money you could buy a nearly new 997 GT3 RS and a Caterham R500! As much as I understand and appreciate classic 911s, my choice would not be the 993 in that instancewink

Magners P.H

6,631 posts

215 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
RobM77 said:
Blimey - £123k?! For that money you could buy a nearly new 997 GT3 RS and a Caterham R500! As much as I understand and appreciate classic 911s, my choice would not be the 993 in that instancewink
Well the 993 would be the choice if I was buying a Porsche for that money

If I wasn't buying a Porsche for that money I would be down the Lamborghini dealer (and on the phone to Tubi)wink


Edited by Magners P.H on Friday 9th May 14:24

NiallOswald

326 posts

207 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
Guys, what's the problem with someone saying they dislike the car? If I had £xxx,000 I wouldn't buy a Maybach just because I could.

If I had £130k, I would, however, have one of these smile Anyone seen the Autocar video where it murders the Corvette Z06? That Porsche have created a rear-engined, 2WD car with so much power that isn't a *complete* firey backwards-into-a-hedge-at-150mph death-machine and can actually be used is very impressive.

Mat Hammond

1,044 posts

210 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
I love this car! My boss had a 2002 GT2 it was mad and very very bad.

Steve Steve Steve Steve Steve Steve

STEVE (Sutcliffe) if you read this (creep creep) I do not live far from you and as I am my own boss and have lots of spare time for track days and surfing during the week, I would like to offer my services as an Autocar dogs body.

Whilst it may look like you have the best job in the world I know there are day to day areas that need to be sorted (logistics) and simple things like getting the cars ready to be photographed.... (cleaning et al)

Anyway, I am close by. I am not expecting to drive anything of course! I am a fairly normal bloke(!) who thinks if you don't ask you don't get.....

Steve, give me a chance!

Thanks Mat

RobM77

35,349 posts

235 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
Magners P.H said:
RobM77 said:
Blimey - £123k?! For that money you could buy a nearly new 997 GT3 RS and a Caterham R500! As much as I understand and appreciate classic 911s, my choice would not be the 993 in that instancewink
Well the 993 would be the choice if I was buying a Porsche for that money

If I wasn't buying a Porsche for that money I would be down the Lamborghini dealer (and on the phone to Tubi)wink


Edited by Magners P.H on Friday 9th May 14:24
yes Fair enough smile Demand is why it costs that much, so my opinion is bound to be a minority one smile

I noticed the other day that a decent 993 Turbo S costs as much as a brand new 997 Turbo smile

big_rob_sydney

3,405 posts

195 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
I'm not really surprised about the relative bargain it is against the F1. Lets not forget progress.

And the Ferrari 430 Scuderia is as fast around Fiorano as the Enzo.

And we hear the odd article comparing hot hatches against supercars from years gone by.

I think the Porsche is a great car, and posts some very good numbers. I wouldnt buy one though. The Ultima GTR will do 0-100 mph in 5.5 seconds, and blow its doors off for less than half the price. Or a third the price if you take the "build it yourself" option.

redfive1

125 posts

202 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
I recall in 02 i had a C32AMG.Which has to be just about the worst car i have ever owned. Brakes, trac control, seats, you name it it was crap.

Merc gave this guy a car to run and test.I recall he wrote along the line of.....what a great car. I sent him a email of my concerns.

One week later he turned up at a test track in his C32.After 3 laps he had to park up for the day, for all my reasons above.

RobM77

35,349 posts

235 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
big_rob_sydney said:
I'm not really surprised about the relative bargain it is against the F1. Lets not forget progress.

And the Ferrari 430 Scuderia is as fast around Fiorano as the Enzo.

And we hear the odd article comparing hot hatches against supercars from years gone by.

I think the Porsche is a great car, and posts some very good numbers. I wouldnt buy one though. The Ultima GTR will do 0-100 mph in 5.5 seconds, and blow its doors off for less than half the price. Or a third the price if you take the "build it yourself" option.
All very true, but let's not forget that the Mclaren F1 was a new design from the ground up, whereas the 911 is an evolution and benefits from Porsche's considerable experience with previous 911s, and of course the various incarnations of 997 it's based on. I'm fairly convinced that if the Mclaren F1 were built again today it would cost the same allowing for inflation, if not more. Did Mclaren make a profit on the F1? Plus, I don't think that the new GT2 is Mclaren F1 fast is it? The Mclaren F1 weighed only a gnat's whisker over a tonne and had 627bhp from a big capacity normally aspirated engine. Plus of course it seated three in complete comfort with their luggage.

big_rob_sydney

3,405 posts

195 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
RobM77 said:
big_rob_sydney said:
I'm not really surprised about the relative bargain it is against the F1. Lets not forget progress.

And the Ferrari 430 Scuderia is as fast around Fiorano as the Enzo.

And we hear the odd article comparing hot hatches against supercars from years gone by.

I think the Porsche is a great car, and posts some very good numbers. I wouldnt buy one though. The Ultima GTR will do 0-100 mph in 5.5 seconds, and blow its doors off for less than half the price. Or a third the price if you take the "build it yourself" option.
All very true, but let's not forget that the Mclaren F1 was a new design from the ground up, whereas the 911 is an evolution and benefits from Porsche's considerable experience with previous 911s, and of course the various incarnations of 997 it's based on. I'm fairly convinced that if the Mclaren F1 were built again today it would cost the same allowing for inflation, if not more. Did Mclaren make a profit on the F1? Plus, I don't think that the new GT2 is Mclaren F1 fast is it? The Mclaren F1 weighed only a gnat's whisker over a tonne and had 627bhp from a big capacity normally aspirated engine. Plus of course it seated three in complete comfort with their luggage.
Believe it or not, Maclaren had an Ultima, which they used as a chassis platform to test their engine. I think that car was nicknaed Arthur, or something similar?

I'll grant you that the F1 is a great car. And for the price, so it should be. But the amazing benchmark they set all those years ago has come and gone. Maybe when the lines are blurred about seating capacity, or luggage capacity, it makes the discussion interesting. But this is why I always refer back to raw performance stats. The stopwatch never lies.

RobM77

35,349 posts

235 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
big_rob_sydney said:
RobM77 said:
big_rob_sydney said:
I'm not really surprised about the relative bargain it is against the F1. Lets not forget progress.

And the Ferrari 430 Scuderia is as fast around Fiorano as the Enzo.

And we hear the odd article comparing hot hatches against supercars from years gone by.

I think the Porsche is a great car, and posts some very good numbers. I wouldnt buy one though. The Ultima GTR will do 0-100 mph in 5.5 seconds, and blow its doors off for less than half the price. Or a third the price if you take the "build it yourself" option.
All very true, but let's not forget that the Mclaren F1 was a new design from the ground up, whereas the 911 is an evolution and benefits from Porsche's considerable experience with previous 911s, and of course the various incarnations of 997 it's based on. I'm fairly convinced that if the Mclaren F1 were built again today it would cost the same allowing for inflation, if not more. Did Mclaren make a profit on the F1? Plus, I don't think that the new GT2 is Mclaren F1 fast is it? The Mclaren F1 weighed only a gnat's whisker over a tonne and had 627bhp from a big capacity normally aspirated engine. Plus of course it seated three in complete comfort with their luggage.
Believe it or not, Maclaren had an Ultima, which they used as a chassis platform to test their engine. I think that car was nicknaed Arthur, or something similar?

I'll grant you that the F1 is a great car. And for the price, so it should be. But the amazing benchmark they set all those years ago has come and gone. Maybe when the lines are blurred about seating capacity, or luggage capacity, it makes the discussion interesting. But this is why I always refer back to raw performance stats. The stopwatch never lies.
That's right, yes. I believe they had two Ultimas to test engine and drivetrain etc.

For me, the Mclaren F1 is my favourite car for many reasons other than pure pace, which is why it remains my ultimate car even now. For pure speed there have always been Dauer 962s, tuned up F40s etc. There's even a guy in Japan with an F3000 car converted for the road! In some ways, creating racing cars is far easier than creating road cars. The Mclaren F1 though is an exquisitely crafted road car where everything is created to perfection. It's performance doesn't really feature in my mind when I dream of owning one.

dinkel

26,959 posts

259 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
RobM77 said:
It's performance doesn't really feature in my mind when I dream of owning one.
My thoughts exactly.

Callan.T89

8,422 posts

194 months

Friday 9th May 2008
quotequote all
I really can't see the point of this car if it's not a GT2 homolgation car? I had the pleasure of working on a number of 993 GT2's and they are an awe-inspiring piece of kit in road or race trim. But there really didn't seem to be a reason to buy a 996 or 997 GT2, a normal turbo is faster Point - Point, more manageable and comfy on the road and it's not as quick as a GT3 on the track? And for 130K you could buy a 1 year old Turbo and Brand New GT3.

I do like the car in a "it had to be done" kind of way, there just doesn't seem to be any reason to buy one?