Pictures of decently Modified cars

Pictures of decently Modified cars

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

SMKurt

2,856 posts

194 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
Decent


Otter Smacker

6,524 posts

194 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
This thing is fast... I mean, really fking fast...




This (OKE-020) is a fully fledged road going machine that can pull 8.5 secs @ 171mph in a quarter mile yikes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkOpj-4-tZk&fea... - Wait and see when the turbo kicks in eek

odyssey2200

18,650 posts

209 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
Holy Crap!

When that turbo gets upto speed does it turn the car inside out?

Otter Smacker

6,524 posts

194 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
^
hehe

Looks that way...But when it's strapped down to a rolling road, it seems like it wants to go to the moonhehe
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYeaFulX-sM&fea...

cheadle hulme

2,457 posts

182 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
It does a Millenium Falcon. bloody hell!

carl0s

528 posts

228 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
Otter Smacker said:
Anyone know where I can buy some of that corrugated heat-shield metal ?

Vixpy1

42,624 posts

264 months

Sunday 15th August 2010
quotequote all
RB30 yum

stew-S160

8,006 posts

238 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all
carl0s said:
Otter Smacker said:
Anyone know where I can buy some of that corrugated heat-shield metal ?
You mean the stuff covering the turbo? That's Nimbus heat shielding.



Update on mine, new wheels and shiny.



Alfanatic

9,339 posts

219 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all
MGB Boy said:


Is that a RWD Puma... or 4wd perhaps?

Poncho pilot

2,091 posts

188 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all



powwerr

1,978 posts

172 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all
^^^^^^^^^^^ cossie or v8?

TotalControl

8,062 posts

198 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all
I genuinely thought that the work gone into this was pretty good. Better than all the other cack efforts on these cars out there.

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/1969044.htm


ManOpener

12,467 posts

169 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all
Alfanatic said:
MGB Boy said:


Is that a RWD Puma... or 4wd perhaps?
That's awesome. Reminds me of this:


Can't remember the engine in it though, 2.1 turbo of some description from memory.

Skylinecrazy

Original Poster:

13,986 posts

194 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all
2180CC Xtrack turbo.

:geek:

Brilliant car to watch!


ManOpener

12,467 posts

169 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all
Skylinecrazy said:
2180CC Xtrack turbo.

:geek:

Brilliant car to watch!
Didn't x-Trac do the drivetrain and gearbox? I thought it was a 2.1 derived from an RS200?

Skylinecrazy

Original Poster:

13,986 posts

194 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all

Spec: Driveshaft, Carbon fibre composite Body work
Carbon fibre / carbon kevlar Engine, *** 2.0l quad turbo chassis,
bespoke t45 titanium alloy chassis gearbox, experimental xtrac externally adjustable sequential box
Drive type, 4 wheel drive system with anti lag road speed laser system
fully independent drive axles
Performance: 0-60, 1.4-1.6s 0-160, 3.5-3.8s 865 AWBHP

Copied from the internet..

The 0-60 claims I fully believe too.

Yes, you're right about the BDT engine....



Edited by Skylinecrazy on Monday 16th August 19:25

BCA

8,623 posts

257 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all
Skylinecrazy said:
Spec: Driveshaft, Carbon fibre composite Body work
Carbon fibre / carbon kevlar Engine, *** 2.0l quad turbo chassis,
bespoke t45 titanium alloy chassis gearbox, experimental xtrac externally adjustable sequential box
Drive type, 4 wheel drive system with anti lag road speed laser system
fully independent drive axles
Performance: 0-60, 1.4-1.6s 0-160, 3.5-3.8s 865 AWBHP

Copied from the internet..

The 0-60 claims I fully believe too.

Yes, you're right about the BDT engine....
You shouldnt... both those figures look wrong to me. The car runs superbly at the BST's (where that photo was taken) - however, it's terminals are'nt 150mph+ from memory, so the 0-160 figure is out. It is a very very very quick and fantastically built bit of kit, but it cannot do the figures suggested.

Skylinecrazy

Original Poster:

13,986 posts

194 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all
Hmm, I think the 0-60 time is pretty damn close though.

I have no idea what is right and what's wrong really, like I said, quoted off the internet!


Gompo

4,413 posts

258 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all
Probably means 160kph?

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

233 months

Monday 16th August 2010
quotequote all
Gompo said:
Probably means 160kph?
probably
think you'd need a lot more than 1000hp to get 0-160mph in under 4 seconds

Edited by Hugo a Gogo on Monday 16th August 20:11

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED