What Truck?

Author
Discussion

Mars

8,743 posts

215 months

Saturday 17th January 2009
quotequote all
Really? Their reputation is exactly the opposite.

I have no experience, and personally would buy a Landy, but these things seem to command awe and wonder amongst the overlanders.

BLUETHUNDER

7,881 posts

261 months

Saturday 17th January 2009
quotequote all
I speak as i find.A lot of people in the MV scene bought these.A lot were ex-reserve stock.Like brand new.A lot of time was actually spent fixing them at the side of the road,rather than getting to a show.The only russian built vehicle i would have,is a BMP.But thats a different ball game altogether.

BaronVonVTEC

397 posts

185 months

Saturday 17th January 2009
quotequote all
Forget the yank tanks, you need German refinement and build quality.



I think the Wehrmacht detachment and light gun are optional extras.

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

232 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
I have the 2004 5.4L F150, Lariat model. It is more luxurious than my Jag. smile I get about 21MPG (US gallons) on the Highway. The 2004 and later have totally different suspension and frames. 100% stiffer than before, and the ride is car-like. That said, the new Dodge Ram is even more plush inside with cools bits like the built-in ice chest and the outer bed fenders opening up for storage. The Dodges with Cummins diesels can push a full sized Ram and still get 25 US MPG. yes

All Yank trucks are solid and reliable, truck customers here would not have it otherwise. All of these petrol or diesels engines can be chipped to up to double their HP.

My advice = Used (2004-2007) F150 / new - Dodge Ram.


BigLepton

5,042 posts

202 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
It is more luxurious than my Jag. smile
In the same sense that a Las Vegas hotel suite is more 'luxurious' than the torquoise drawing room at Castle Howard. . . . . . wink

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

232 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
BigLepton said:
Jimbeaux said:
It is more luxurious than my Jag. smile
In the same sense that a Las Vegas hotel suite is more 'luxurious' than the torquoise drawing room at Castle Howard. . . . . . wink
No. I love my Jag and it has unmatchable character. However, the amentities, leather,etc. are better in my Ford. Sorry, just is.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
Marquis_Rex said:
I've never done a 'What car' kind of thread and usually view them as quite tedious, but if you cant beat them join them!
Besides, this forth coming purchase of vehicle is one of my least emotional purchases and I need to make a decision quickly- like within less than a week.

I move up north to Ilinois very soon, where to say, it snows alot would probably be an understatement. So 4WD is definately a requirement, along with the capability to tow a Porsche 993 Turbo or Dodge Challenger on a trailer and not break into a sweat. I'll also probably be carrying heavy engines such as Dodge Hemis and BMW S50s around. I may even take this pick up camping sometimes. In time I may do some off-roading in it. I definately need four seats also.
It seems like an amazing time to buy right now, with even dealers putting up sticker prices of way below Blue book values.


I was always naturally drawn to the brawny good looks of the Dodge Ram- especially the "Big Rig" post 2003 design.



So far, I've found a 2005 Chevrolet Silverado Z 71 truck for sale. It has covered 117,000 miles, and has the trusty pushrod 5.3 litre Vortec V8 that makes about 310 Bhp. Apparently the Z71 package is a special off road package with skid pans and specially tuned gas pressure shocks.
The book value for this truck is about $13,000. The dealer had it down to $10,990, however after a test drive and some shrewd negotiating, I got him down to $7,900yikes
The truck looks similar to this:


The truck felt refined and comfortable to drive, although it didnt feel all that fast and the engine felt too subdued. The truck had obviously been taken off road a bit, and unusual for a southern truck had some light surface rust underneath. I personally think the truck looks fairly bland. No real service history I could trace and I dont know how many owners.

The next truck I came across was the 2005 Ford F 150 5.4 litre 300 Bhp V8 "XLT"-which is a base model (less to go wrong). This one is up for $9000 as it has covered 165,000 miles, but has full 'Ben Satchers' Service history and only 1 owner. This truck felt tight and solid and the condition was great inside and out. It also felt fast to drive and it was very easy to 'light up the rears'. There was a slight shudder/shake at 55 mph-which is probably down to wheel imbalance. This truck felt much more responsive than the Chevy, with more direct feeling steering, a great sounding engine, felt faster, and more agile. I went to the dealer who had serviced it, and no expense seems to have been spared in its up keep. The 5.4 litre engine is a 3 valve design, over head cam, and has more torque than the Chevy, not only due to the capacity advantage but also due to the better port air flows combined with shorter duration cams. This truck was typical of a southern truck, and the underneath was just as clean as the top- even the exhausts still seemed aluminised.




Personally I think in the looks department the truck looks bland.

I was out at a bar the other night and by chance the bar man told me his 2003 Dodge Ram thats covered only 60,000 miles may be up for sale for around the $10,000 mark. I told him I would be interested if he was interested in selling. He said he'd get back to me. Viewing the truck externally, has some dings, but has the Rams classically butch good looks. I havent driven it yet, but it has the 5.7 litre hemi engine. This has a shallow Hemi combustion chamber with a twin plug layout (for a fast burn) and cylinder deactivation. This is also a pushrod layout so probably has very low friction. If the gearing has been matched well to the vehicle and cylinder deact- this one promises to have the best fuel economy. From what I;'ve heard it should also sound the best also.

From what Ive heard- Ford makes the toughest Truck chasis and frames. I dont really know if I would be utilising this 'toughness' though. The extra torque of 5.7 hemi would be welcome though. ANy other helpful comments or suggestions welcome!
In all honesty I think ANY big name truck will suit.

Personally I've always loved the look of the Ram, but sales figures place GM and Ford higher - make of this what you will.

For me I love diesels, so on that count the Cummins 5.9 in the 2500 Ram and the 6.6 Duramax in the Silverado 2500HD would be my choice, but maybe this will beyond budget.

A last option might be too look at the new Jeep Wrangler JK Unlimited. It should fit the bill fairly well and be better off road. Towing it should be fine, although it may not 'officially' support the towing weights you want.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
tossbag said:




All you need to know.

Edited by tossbag on Saturday 17th January 04:06
lol

accept they aren't sold in the US. They are also too unreliable and expensive on maintenance compared to running American trucks.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
The Black Duke said:
Buy anything Japanese if you cant quite have a Landy?
And you base this opinion by having only an MX5 listed in your profile??

Have you ever been to the US and seen what the trucks are used for any why? Or why they have form many years been the best selling vehicles in America?

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
BigLepton said:
Marquis_Rex said:
I also dont imagine the Defender is too refined over long distances when, say , crusing from Illinois to Oregon on Vacation (2000 miles plus)
Yeah, I mean how could it's permanent 4WD, coil springs and disc brakes all round compete with cart springs and drums? biggrin

You can also tow 7700lbs easily and legally because the central diff-lock means you can use all ten forward gears and two reverse on the road without winding up the transmission.

But they are a pointless choice on your side of the pond as the youngest official one you can get is now 15 years old and the price of rarity is high.

Best get which ever one of those big ugly chrome gin palaces they are giving the best deal on as they are all pretty similar underneath. smile
I think ignorance must be bliss.....

XitUp

7,690 posts

205 months

Sunday 18th January 2009
quotequote all
The Black Duke said:
XitUp said:
The Black Duke said:
Buy anything Japanese if you cant quite have a Landy?
He said he needs to tow stuff.
Toyota Tundra will tow the Queen Mary 2 LOL
Pretty sure they don't tow as much as the Yanks. Aren't they way more expensive too?
It also gets worse mpg than the American trucks.

Marquis_Rex

Original Poster:

7,377 posts

240 months

Wednesday 21st January 2009
quotequote all
The Black Duke said:
XitUp said:
The Black Duke said:
Buy anything Japanese if you cant quite have a Landy?
He said he needs to tow stuff.
Toyota Tundra will tow the Queen Mary 2 LOL
Its funny when people witter on about Jap crap as if they're the Holy Grail. Had some Californian going on about Toyotas today rolleyes


FRAME:

The Ram’s frame is hydroformed (reducing the number of welds) with fully boxed rails, carrying a tensile strength rating of 85,000 psi. The advantages are strength and a 30 lb. weight savings. It’s hard to beat. The rear section is a complete re-design to accommodate the new coil spring rear suspension.

The Tundra’s frame is arguably it’s weak spot. While the jury is still out on Toyota’s choice to use the triple-tech frame instead of a more traditional fully-boxed frame (like the Ram, F150, and GM trucks), it’s clear from stories of bed-bounce that Toyota hasn’t gotten the frame completely right.

Winner: Ram. Toyota’s decision to use a frame completely different than every other truck seems like an unwise decision.



Just not intersted in Tundras really

GavinPearson

5,715 posts

252 months

Wednesday 21st January 2009
quotequote all
If there is one thing the Detroit 3 know how to do a fantastic job on it's building pickup trucks. The latest ones are absolutely superb, with interiors and amenities as nice as many top luxury cars.

I really would recommend driving all of the trucks, and see how they react to potholes and such like which are the norm in the midwest in winter.

Personally I would get the F150 for general commuting, the newer the better because the later ones are better to drive.

As for the people who talk about the Tundra - I think once you try it you see why they can't sell them in anything like the volume they hoped - thirsty and poorly engineered compared to the competition.

Nissan's Titan is also behind the competition, which is why in a few years Dodge will be building a version of their truck for Nissan.

Marquis_Rex

Original Poster:

7,377 posts

240 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
I'm now a true American tongue out




and yes.....It's a Hemi wink
lick

Edited by Marquis_Rex on Friday 23 January 19:36

Marquis_Rex

Original Poster:

7,377 posts

240 months

Saturday 24th January 2009
quotequote all
Amazing how folks over here are brainwashed into becoming Toyota evangelists.
There's little doubt that Toyota make robust and reliable cars now. Contrrary to popular opinion- this didnt happen overnight and in the 70s their cars were rubbish. Phrases like Cheap-Jap-crap came about for good reason. To their considerable credit-they learnt but this didnt happen over night.
With trucks they're still learning.

On this informative you tube video about truck frames-
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zRfE_XAk2mE&feat...

I came across this thickie who made this comment:

"this is one hilarious video, especially since you noobs are too dumb to realize that ALL 3/4 and 1 ton pickups from the big 3 are made with at least 2/3 C channel...just like the Tundra. A good frame needs to bend under heavy loads or it will be much more prone to cracking. You go try telling a trucker with a F-350 super duty that his truck is inferior to a F-150. The Tundra really is the truck that's changing it all."
rofl

Last time I looked at Hookes law as applied to metal I dont remember reaching a 'cracking' limit before going over the hookian extension limit or the plastic region rolleyes



Raffles

1,931 posts

231 months

Saturday 24th January 2009
quotequote all
I'm tempted to get a Dodge Ram in the UK, I had a look at one but it ended up I couldn't afford it. I got an MX5 in the end!

I have had both a Chevvie Silverado and a F150 in the US and loved them both. So good for long journeys and a feeling of poweraround town. I feel you would just look a nob in the UK though, but would eb worth it!


Me in the F150

And what looks like me trying to appear as gay as possible frown


I really want one...

Marquis_Rex

Original Poster:

7,377 posts

240 months

Saturday 24th January 2009
quotequote all
Raffles said:
I'm tempted to get a Dodge Ram in the UK, I had a look at one but it ended up I couldn't afford it. I got an MX5 in the end!

I have had both a Chevvie Silverado and a F150 in the US and loved them both. So good for long journeys and a feeling of poweraround town. I feel you would just look a nob in the UK though, but would eb worth it!


Me in the F150

And what looks like me trying to appear as gay as possible frown
No doubt about it, the F 150 is a damned good truck. That looks like the one I test drove.
I have a friend in the UK from Essex and she's really turned onto the idea of getting a Ram now. May be she'll look less of a knob because she's a woman?
Looking at Autotrader.co.uk I see them from anywhere from 7000 up to 25,000 GBP. With British petrol prices, I told her it may be worth getting the diesel. they get around 22 mpg over here, with means about 25 mpg (UK).

With the weakness of the British pound, I wonder if it is STILL cheaper to import one yourself....

BLUETHUNDER

7,881 posts

261 months

Saturday 24th January 2009
quotequote all
Well this has served me well for the last year............


308mate

13,757 posts

223 months

Saturday 24th January 2009
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
BigLepton said:
Marquis_Rex said:
I also dont imagine the Defender is too refined over long distances when, say , crusing from Illinois to Oregon on Vacation (2000 miles plus)
Yeah, I mean how could it's permanent 4WD, coil springs and disc brakes all round compete with cart springs and drums? biggrin

You can also tow 7700lbs easily and legally because the central diff-lock means you can use all ten forward gears and two reverse on the road without winding up the transmission.

But they are a pointless choice on your side of the pond as the youngest official one you can get is now 15 years old and the price of rarity is high.

Best get which ever one of those big ugly chrome gin palaces they are giving the best deal on as they are all pretty similar underneath. smile
I think ignorance must be bliss.....
Despite all the things practicalities listed above, the Land Rover WILL be a hideous vehicle to do 2000miles+ in compared to the yank.

And you will be forever changing gear.

US trucks truck work for US conditions and requirements. Thats why they sell. Its not like the US has an aversion to Land Rover products either. Look at Discoweb.org for example. Also, Id rather have cart springs for towing in any case.

SVT Rick

3,633 posts

196 months

Saturday 24th January 2009
quotequote all
BLUETHUNDER said:
Well this has served me well for the last year............

Nice clean truck that.
Anyone would think your trying to sell it.whistle