Could Ford make premium brand cars?

Could Ford make premium brand cars?

Author
Discussion

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

218 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Alfa_75_Steve said:
The point is that people who drive modestly priced Japanese hatchbacks rarely do many miles, and rarely at any speed, so suffer the fewest problems with their cars. The dealers treat them well, as they buy a new one every 3 years, even if they only did 5k miles in their last one. They also like to tell everyone how reliable their Nisondota is.

Whereas, people who buy other brands, are more likely to cover higher mileages, at higher speeds, be company car drivers, or buy on the used market and suffer more breakdowns. They're also the kind of people who would only mention the reliability of their car when it broke.
Strange how it's also the fleet magazine publications who put the Japanese on or close to the top every time.

Must be hard tracking down all those old doris fleet drivers who do 5k a year.


Or you could be talking rubbish.

As an example...

http://www.free-press-release.com/news/200611/1164...

Edited by 10 Pence Short on Thursday 6th August 08:46

Dave_ST220

10,296 posts

206 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Alfa_75_Steve your comments do make me laugh. Ford are crap yet motoring press raves about them, Lexus are crap and not premium at all and Japenese hatch backs don't go anywhere hence their reliabilty laugh

Jaguar steve

9,232 posts

211 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
ExPat2B said:
Alfa_75_Steve said:
350GT said:
Alfa_75_Steve said:
Jaguar steve said:
Article in The Times 28 July. Which? surveyed over 84000 owners of 121 different cars and reported both the XF and S Type were in the bottom 10 for reliability. The top 10 were nearly all modestly priced Japanese cars.
Could be that the only dullards who answer Which? surveys are the kind of people who buy modestly priced Japanese hatchbacks and never exceed 40mph in them...
You know they asked owners don't you?
Yes, I do.

The point is that people who drive modestly priced Japanese hatchbacks rarely do many miles, and rarely at any speed, so suffer the fewest problems with their cars. The dealers treat them well, as they buy a new one every 3 years, even if they only did 5k miles in their last one. They also like to tell everyone how reliable their Nisondota is.

Whereas, people who buy other brands, are more likely to cover higher mileages, at higher speeds, be company car drivers, or buy on the used market and suffer more breakdowns. They're also the kind of people who would only mention the reliability of their car when it broke.
What a bunch of emotive, biased, subjective testicles. Honestly Steve, sometimes I think you live in a parralel dimension.

Jap cars are reliable because :

1. They have a culture of respect for reliability.
2. They are built with world leading quality control
3. They invest in the best production facilities.
4. The workers are experienced, well trained and motivated.

You only have to live in the real world of cars for a short time to realise the truth of this. Things like the quality of the welds, the service histories that show nothing other than routine servicing, every single reliability survey they dominate the top 10.

To write off that excellent reputation as a blip caused by stodgy Which ? readers is the most laughable thing ever, especially from an Alfa owner.
yes. I've been an almost lifelong Jaguar fan and owned XJs for years. It grieves me to say this but compared to a Honda, quality wise they really are crap, so much so in fact that, despite looking at several of the aluminium bodied XJs as a possible replacement I'm begining to doubt if I'll ever buy another one.

The fit and finish, number of rattles, tactile quality and consistency of panel gaps on my curent XJ is really no better than that on Mrs JS's Pug 206 and woefully inferior to my mate's 4 year old Civic.

If Honda can do quality for a starting price of around twelve grand, why can't Jaguar even get close let alone do the same for three or four times as much?

Alfa_75_Steve

7,489 posts

201 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
No 1 in that fleet survey was the Honda Accord, the diesel version of which drinks oil like a 90s Alfa TSpark, and subsequently gained a bit of a reputation for blowing turbos....

CarbonM5

927 posts

192 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
I used to like Fords especially the quickish ones,but in the 9yrs of my driving career i have been left stranded at the road side 4 times with 2 engine failures,gearbox failure and a less serious exhaust falling off.

They were Fords!

A focus,sierra cossie,fiesta-all were mint cars aswell so no excuses.The fact is Ford are Cheapskates!

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

218 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Alfa_75_Steve said:
No 1 in that fleet survey was the Honda Accord
That was all you needed to say.

ClintonB

4,721 posts

214 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
CarbonM5 said:
I used to like Fords especially the quickish ones,but in the 9yrs of my driving career i have been left stranded at the road side 4 times with 2 engine failures,gearbox failure and a less serious exhaust falling off.

They were Fords!

A focus,sierra cossie,fiesta-all were mint cars aswell so no excuses.The fact is Ford are Cheapskates!
However, it's not hard to see plenty of premium cars stranded by the roadside either.


My last car and current one have done ballpark similar mileages & the current one has done it a bit quicker (pro-rata).
One has had thousands of English pounds worth of warranty work done & other problems (not fixed as it would involve my pocket being emptied) and the other has had one slight issue that isn't any more than a mild irritant. One is expensive on consumables and one isn't.


One Ford, one Honda. Take your pick.