RE: Driven: MINI E

Author
Discussion

odyssey2200

18,650 posts

210 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
Pointless eco warrior wetdream.


pbirkett

18,094 posts

273 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
People have obviously forgotten the real threat of black-outs and such like in a few years due to power stations being closed down, without replacement, so what do we do? Rely on cars that need leccy! Really clever given the current climate!

Shoot Blair

3,097 posts

177 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
What we need are scalextrix style contacts. You could couple in your sat nav and sit back and have a cappucino whilst the car did it's stuff.

I wonder how long until people are fking about with motor windings. "I'm sorry sir, you have fitted a transformer to boost accelleration, your insurance is invalid"

Prescott Hillclimb, the new Super Ferrari E1 car, fitted with an eco carbon motor, ceramic gears, special superconducting brushes and the latest in regenerative braking, all powered by a windturbine up the top. rolleyes

Call me a luddite, but these are fking lame. If you want to use transport, take a train.

Funnily enough, Issigonis, designer of the mini experimented with electric cars...with the motors in the wheels.

I'm really sorry and ashamed at myself for being so backward, but these really are st. It's a glorified milkfloat and whilst these are most certainly the future. Your satnav could even make sure you slow down by a big nanny state style sealed rheostat, to make sure speedkills doesn't happen. rolleyes

SimonSaid

407 posts

187 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
SLacKer said:
Make the battery pack into a pod underneath the car and make that interchangeable like a bloody mobile phone then no need to wait for charging.....pull into an E Station and let the robots take over.
I mentioned this to Wieland Bruch at BMW (minus the robots bit!), who said that they are aware of the idea, but are waiting to see if a standardised battery setup emerges before the system could be practical. He said that if one particular battery standard emerges, then they would be interested in this idea.

Edited by SimonSaid on Friday 16th October 15:36

XitUp

7,690 posts

205 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
pbirkett said:
People have obviously forgotten the real threat of black-outs and such like in a few years due to power stations being closed down, without replacement, so what do we do? Rely on cars that need leccy! Really clever given the current climate!
I would assume most people would plug in at night when there is a surplus of power...


But yeah, we need more nuclear plants to be built pretty sharpish.

patmahe

5,754 posts

205 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
After some rough but generous (to the mini e) back of an envelope calculations, I reckon that at £330 per month + 1.50 per 10 hour charge, the mini would cost approx 27% more than my current daily driver to use and be less flexible. For example I regularly travel to my girlfriends parents house on weekends, a journey of 100 miles. Judging by this cars real world range it would struggle to make it.

Electric cars are the future, but they have a long way to go before they become properly viable and further still before they become desirable.

Besides when we've all switched over to electric cars they'll simply throw all the taxes currently on fuel onto electricity instead. Meaning running a car will be just as expensive and providing power for your home will be a lot more expensive. Of course they'll tell us its all in an effort to reduce emissions, nothing to do with them not wanting to lose the revenue.

odyssey2200

18,650 posts

210 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
patmahe said:


Besides when we've all switched over to electric cars they'll simply throw all the taxes currently on fuel onto electricity instead.and add some for good measure. Meaning running a car will be just asmore expensive and providing power for your home will be a lot more expensive.
EFA
My bold

XitUp

7,690 posts

205 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
patmahe said:
After some rough but generous (to the mini e) back of an envelope calculations, I reckon that at £330 per month + 1.50 per 10 hour charge, the mini would cost approx 27% more than my current daily driver to use and be less flexible. For example I regularly travel to my girlfriends parents house on weekends, a journey of 100 miles. Judging by this cars real world range it would struggle to make it.

Electric cars are the future, but they have a long way to go before they become properly viable and further still before they become desirable.

Besides when we've all switched over to electric cars they'll simply throw all the taxes currently on fuel onto electricity instead. Meaning running a car will be just as expensive and providing power for your home will be a lot more expensive. Of course they'll tell us its all in an effort to reduce emissions, nothing to do with them not wanting to lose the revenue.
Is your daily driver the lotus in your profile?

Have you done the calculations with another new car rather than a six year old one so it's not an apples to oranges comparison?

robsti

12,241 posts

207 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
XitUp said:
pbirkett said:
People have obviously forgotten the real threat of black-outs and such like in a few years due to power stations being closed down, without replacement, so what do we do? Rely on cars that need leccy! Really clever given the current climate!
I would assume most people would plug in at night when there is a surplus of power...


But yeah, we need more nuclear plants to be built pretty sharpish.
If everyone had an eletric car there would not be a surplus of power...!

PJR

2,616 posts

213 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
Shoot Blair said:
I'm really sorry and ashamed at myself for being so backward,
It's ok, we're rapidly getting used to it.

P,

XitUp

7,690 posts

205 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
robsti said:
XitUp said:
pbirkett said:
People have obviously forgotten the real threat of black-outs and such like in a few years due to power stations being closed down, without replacement, so what do we do? Rely on cars that need leccy! Really clever given the current climate!
I would assume most people would plug in at night when there is a surplus of power...


But yeah, we need more nuclear plants to be built pretty sharpish.
If everyone had an eletric car there would not be a surplus of power...!
That's true. Like I said, we need a lot more nuclear power plants building quickly. Thing is, it's pretty unlikely that everyone would buy a new car on one day isn't it?

patmahe

5,754 posts

205 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
XitUp said:
patmahe said:
After some rough but generous (to the mini e) back of an envelope calculations, I reckon that at £330 per month + 1.50 per 10 hour charge, the mini would cost approx 27% more than my current daily driver to use and be less flexible. For example I regularly travel to my girlfriends parents house on weekends, a journey of 100 miles. Judging by this cars real world range it would struggle to make it.

Electric cars are the future, but they have a long way to go before they become properly viable and further still before they become desirable.

Besides when we've all switched over to electric cars they'll simply throw all the taxes currently on fuel onto electricity instead. Meaning running a car will be just as expensive and providing power for your home will be a lot more expensive. Of course they'll tell us its all in an effort to reduce emissions, nothing to do with them not wanting to lose the revenue.
Is your daily driver the lotus in your profile?

Have you done the calculations with another new car rather than a six year old one so it's not an apples to oranges comparison?
No it was done based on my 11 year old Toyota Corolla, which I use for my commute. The reason I did the calculation was to see if it would be viable for me to change over if such an offer was on the table. Whether a car is new or not (or even 11 years old) makes little difference to me. It may make a difference to others.

What matters to me is how well a car suits my needs. As a commuter car, my current car suits me better than this would. In my mind I was comparing a car for my commute with an alternative car for my commute so it was an apples to apples comparison for me, age did not come into it, but cost did.

But I do take your point that if a new car was important to you that depreciation would then become a factor. I do however wonder, if BMW were rolling this out on a wide scale would the cars be so cheap (ie. are they subsidising the scheme somewhat, since profit is not their primary motive at this stage) and also as I said above if we were all driving around in electric cars then the powers that be would simply heap all the fuel taxes onto electricity, making electric cars a lot less viable.

It would be interesting to have all of the information to hand to make a fair comparison. Like for like with new cars and to take into account their whole life environmental impacts and running/purchase costs. Unfortunately we can only guess at this stage. But for me for the time being and for what I need the car for, I would not be tempted to switch.

va1o

16,032 posts

208 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
God idea but as mentioned in the review clearly dosent work to well in the MINI because of the space the batteries etc take up. I reckon the car really needs to be designed with a sandwich platform like the small Mercedes and smart car, so the batteries can be held in between the passenger compartment and bottom of the car.



Edited by va1o on Friday 16th October 23:14

FishFace

3,790 posts

209 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
You have to pay BMW to test their car for them? Are the fking kidding?

XitUp said:
PJR said:
hornetrider said:
Is battery power actually less polluting than internal combusiton engines though, given that the car has to be plugged in over night?
Yes. Much.

No one is saying coal fired power stations and nuclear reactors are eco friendly. But an electric car still has far less demanding energy requirements over all.

P,
I am, in comparison to the vast majority of other ways of generating electricity.

As for the car, take half the battery out and stick in a small range extender engine please.
It'd be interesting in countries with lots of sunshine to see how feasible a solar power setup would be to run the thing for free.

nav p

324 posts

188 months

Sunday 18th October 2009
quotequote all
£4000 per year to be a test pig for BMW?

They must be kidding,you can buy a prius or other eco cars for that monthly payment(that are ezxcempt from CC) that you own and the development has been done!

I bet it it is over subscribed too...must be not getting the logic.

SLacKer

2,622 posts

208 months

Sunday 18th October 2009
quotequote all
SimonSaid said:
SLacKer said:
Make the battery pack into a pod underneath the car and make that interchangeable like a bloody mobile phone then no need to wait for charging.....pull into an E Station and let the robots take over.
I mentioned this to Wieland Bruch at BMW (minus the robots bit!), who said that they are aware of the idea, but are waiting to see if a standardised battery setup emerges before the system could be practical. He said that if one particular battery standard emerges, then they would be interested in this idea.

Edited by SimonSaid on Friday 16th October 15:36
There are standards for PC equipment so why don't the car makers get together and thrash out a standard that they all go with. Maybe have types of battery module for specific vehicle types. The robot bit is about an automated mechanism to swap em over at an E Station. You drive over the mechanism and it swaps the batteries for you. So you never own the batteries you just pay for the recharging etc. That would extend the range somewhat.

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

219 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
Interesting that they manage to cock the handling up so much by adding only 260Kg, ok its a lot but only the same as three blokes?

Is it not that the weight is in a different place? could it not be better spread distribution wise i wonder?

The whole thing about it being a 2 seater as well, its taking the mick just a bit, why not make it as a 1 or 3 series and keep it as a usable 4 seater, use Alloy / GRP / Whatever panels / thinner glass to get maybe 75Kg off the weight.

I know its classed as WIP, but it seems more like marketing in progress to me.

900T-R

20,404 posts

258 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
nav p said:
£4000 per year to be a test pig for BMW?

They must be kidding,you can buy a prius or other eco cars for that monthly payment(that are ezxcempt from CC) that you own and the development has been done!

I bet it it is over subscribed too...must be not getting the logic.
I guess some of the ecofriendly folks out there aren't willing to sign their lives away and drive a Pious yet. wink

odyssey2200

18,650 posts

210 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
900T-R said:
nav p said:
£4000 per year to be a test pig for BMW?

They must be kidding,you can buy a prius or other eco cars for that monthly payment(that are ezxcempt from CC) that you own and the development has been done!

I bet it it is over subscribed too...must be not getting the logic.
I guess some of the ecofriendly folks out there aren't willing to sign their lives away and drive a Pious yet. wink
Pious is a far more useable vehicle if if it not as green as it should be.


Funk

26,300 posts

210 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
What do you do when you run out of juice a couple of miles from home? Will people be keeping a spare battery in the boot that they can walk home with, charge up overnight and then go back to the stranded vehicle in the morning?